Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

We are going to do this without Democrats

2

Comments

  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,601 Standard Supporter
    dhdawg said:

    If it's any good, sure. Who gives a fuck about partisanship.
    My guess is the replacement which still hasn't been put forward or previewed will be worse

    Might well be. Getting rid of state border rules should save companies lots of money on administrative costs.

    Anytime the government fucks with anything this important it's probably going to be a shit show.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    Sledog said:

    dhdawg said:

    If it's any good, sure. Who gives a fuck about partisanship.
    My guess is the replacement which still hasn't been put forward or previewed will be worse

    Might well be. Getting rid of state border rules should save companies lots of money on administrative costs.

    Anytime the government fucks with anything this important it's probably going to be a shit show.
    Agree. The government should stop fucking with them, and then shut them down by providing healthcare funding itself
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,601 Standard Supporter
    Yeah the government is so efficient and competent.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    Sledog said:

    Yeah the government is so efficient and competent.

    In health care it is. Much more than private companies
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    dhdawg said:

    Sledog said:

    Yeah the government is so efficient and competent.

    In health care it is. Much more than private companies
    Citation needed
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UWhuskytskeet
    UWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113
    Sledog said:

    dhdawg said:

    If it's any good, sure. Who gives a fuck about partisanship.
    My guess is the replacement which still hasn't been put forward or previewed will be worse

    Might well be. Getting rid of state border rules should save companies lots of money on administrative costs.

    Anytime the government fucks with anything this important it's probably going to be a shit show.
    They'll save a ton of money because they'll only offer plans based on the state with the least provisions. Shitty insurance is great for insurance companies, no so much for consumers.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    UWhuskytskeet said:

    Sledog said:

    dhdawg said:

    If it's any good, sure. Who gives a fuck about partisanship.
    My guess is the replacement which still hasn't been put forward or previewed will be worse

    Might well be. Getting rid of state border rules should save companies lots of money on administrative costs.

    Anytime the government fucks with anything this important it's probably going to be a shit show.
    They'll save a ton of money because they'll only offer plans based on the state with the least provisions. Shitty insurance is great for insurance companies, no so much for consumers.
    Shitty insurance is better than no insurance.

    Also, if you want better insurance, pay for it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,601 Standard Supporter
    edited February 2017
    UWhuskytskeet said:

    Sledog said:

    dhdawg said:

    If it's any good, sure. Who gives a fuck about partisanship.
    My guess is the replacement which still hasn't been put forward or previewed will be worse

    Might well be. Getting rid of state border rules should save companies lots of money on administrative costs.

    Anytime the government fucks with anything this important it's probably going to be a shit show.
    They'll save a ton of money because they'll only offer plans based on the state with the least provisions. Shitty insurance is great for insurance companies, no so much for consumers.
    Do you realize how shitty and expensive Obozo care is? Go price it out don't forget to add the deductible!

    They will save tons by not making males pay for birth control, maternity care and child birth coverage. Lots of stupid shit like that in Obunghole uncare.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    dhdawg said:

    Sledog said:

    Yeah the government is so efficient and competent.

    In health care it is. Much more than private companies
    Citation needed
    http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2015/oct/us-health-care-from-a-global-perspective

    Too lazy to link it but compared to other oecd nations our healthcare system ranks poorly . Connect the dots
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,542 Standard Supporter
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    Sledog said:

    dhdawg said:

    If it's any good, sure. Who gives a fuck about partisanship.
    My guess is the replacement which still hasn't been put forward or previewed will be worse

    Might well be. Getting rid of state border rules should save companies lots of money on administrative costs.

    Anytime the government fucks with anything this important it's probably going to be a shit show.
    They'll save a ton of money because they'll only offer plans based on the state with the least provisions. Shitty insurance is great for insurance companies, no so much for consumers.
    Shitty insurance is better than no insurance.

    Also, if you want better insurance, pay for it.
    I actually agree with this.

    I would have no problem with a hybrid system of basic, defined health care for all and then pay for play.

    If you want the Cadillac care, that comes by paying for the Cadillac plan - and then no bitching by those who can't swing it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter