Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
«1

Comments

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    Why not they voted it in without republicans.

    So now your are in favor of partisan bills? After screaming for 6 years against it?
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    Democrats don't matter anymore. They shot themselves in the face with their Orwellian agenda under Hussein Obama and his international collaborators Merkel, Hollande, Cameron and Trudeau. I'm not a big fan of republicans either. But the democrats can go fuck themselves.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,443 Standard Supporter
    edited February 2017
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Why not they voted it in without republicans.

    So now your are in favor of partisan bills? After screaming for 6 years against it?
    *you're.

    If it fixes Ocommie care hell yeah! And serves the dual purpose of cooking the goose.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Why not they voted it in without republicans.

    So now your are in favor of partisan bills? After screaming for 6 years against it?
    *you're.

    If it fixes Ocommie care hell yeah!
    Yore.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Why not they voted it in without republicans.

    So now your are in favor of partisan bills? After screaming for 6 years against it?
    So now you're against partisan bills? After screaming for 6 years approving it?
    No, I've been saying for 6 years the bill would have been better if Republicans would have added their input. And don't say Democrats didn't try, cause they did reach across the aisle. And asked for input.
  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    If it's any good, sure. Who gives a fuck about partisanship.
    My guess is the replacement which still hasn't been put forward or previewed will be worse
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,804
    dhdawg said:

    If it's any good, sure. Who gives a fuck about partisanship.
    My guess is the replacement which still hasn't been put forward or previewed will be worse

    Ty worse than Sark?
  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    dnc said:

    dhdawg said:

    If it's any good, sure. Who gives a fuck about partisanship.
    My guess is the replacement which still hasn't been put forward or previewed will be worse

    Ty worse than Sark?
    Yes
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,443 Standard Supporter
    dhdawg said:

    If it's any good, sure. Who gives a fuck about partisanship.
    My guess is the replacement which still hasn't been put forward or previewed will be worse

    Might well be. Getting rid of state border rules should save companies lots of money on administrative costs.

    Anytime the government fucks with anything this important it's probably going to be a shit show.
  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    Sledog said:

    dhdawg said:

    If it's any good, sure. Who gives a fuck about partisanship.
    My guess is the replacement which still hasn't been put forward or previewed will be worse

    Might well be. Getting rid of state border rules should save companies lots of money on administrative costs.

    Anytime the government fucks with anything this important it's probably going to be a shit show.
    Agree. The government should stop fucking with them, and then shut them down by providing healthcare funding itself
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,443 Standard Supporter
    Yeah the government is so efficient and competent.
  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    Sledog said:

    Yeah the government is so efficient and competent.

    In health care it is. Much more than private companies
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    dhdawg said:

    Sledog said:

    Yeah the government is so efficient and competent.

    In health care it is. Much more than private companies
    Citation needed
  • UWhuskytskeetUWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113
    Sledog said:

    dhdawg said:

    If it's any good, sure. Who gives a fuck about partisanship.
    My guess is the replacement which still hasn't been put forward or previewed will be worse

    Might well be. Getting rid of state border rules should save companies lots of money on administrative costs.

    Anytime the government fucks with anything this important it's probably going to be a shit show.
    They'll save a ton of money because they'll only offer plans based on the state with the least provisions. Shitty insurance is great for insurance companies, no so much for consumers.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Sledog said:

    dhdawg said:

    If it's any good, sure. Who gives a fuck about partisanship.
    My guess is the replacement which still hasn't been put forward or previewed will be worse

    Might well be. Getting rid of state border rules should save companies lots of money on administrative costs.

    Anytime the government fucks with anything this important it's probably going to be a shit show.
    They'll save a ton of money because they'll only offer plans based on the state with the least provisions. Shitty insurance is great for insurance companies, no so much for consumers.
    Shitty insurance is better than no insurance.

    Also, if you want better insurance, pay for it.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,443 Standard Supporter
    edited February 2017

    Sledog said:

    dhdawg said:

    If it's any good, sure. Who gives a fuck about partisanship.
    My guess is the replacement which still hasn't been put forward or previewed will be worse

    Might well be. Getting rid of state border rules should save companies lots of money on administrative costs.

    Anytime the government fucks with anything this important it's probably going to be a shit show.
    They'll save a ton of money because they'll only offer plans based on the state with the least provisions. Shitty insurance is great for insurance companies, no so much for consumers.
    Do you realize how shitty and expensive Obozo care is? Go price it out don't forget to add the deductible!

    They will save tons by not making males pay for birth control, maternity care and child birth coverage. Lots of stupid shit like that in Obunghole uncare.
  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326

    dhdawg said:

    Sledog said:

    Yeah the government is so efficient and competent.

    In health care it is. Much more than private companies
    Citation needed
    http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2015/oct/us-health-care-from-a-global-perspective

    Too lazy to link it but compared to other oecd nations our healthcare system ranks poorly . Connect the dots
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,810 Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:

    dhdawg said:

    If it's any good, sure. Who gives a fuck about partisanship.
    My guess is the replacement which still hasn't been put forward or previewed will be worse

    Might well be. Getting rid of state border rules should save companies lots of money on administrative costs.

    Anytime the government fucks with anything this important it's probably going to be a shit show.
    They'll save a ton of money because they'll only offer plans based on the state with the least provisions. Shitty insurance is great for insurance companies, no so much for consumers.
    Shitty insurance is better than no insurance.

    Also, if you want better insurance, pay for it.
    I actually agree with this.

    I would have no problem with a hybrid system of basic, defined health care for all and then pay for play.

    If you want the Cadillac care, that comes by paying for the Cadillac plan - and then no bitching by those who can't swing it.
Sign In or Register to comment.