NFL Overtime rules ... you guys okay with this? I don't understand ...
Comments
-
The GOAT won just get the fuck over it already. There is a reason he is the GOAT.
-
11 players line up on offense. 11 players line up on defense. Sounds fair to me.
-
College kids needs a short field, equal chance OT. They are slaves that work 14 hour days.animate said:
not really ... tied at regulation.dnc said:
Also your comparisons are complete bullshit. You just equated driving the length of the field in the NFL to making a free throw or a penalty shot.animate said:Okay, gimme your feedback. I want to know if you feel that NFL OT rules are "fair" or "okay" ...
I don't like it at all. I think it's stupid.
The game was great entertainment ... I personally would like to have seen Atlanta win ... but NE winning it is amazing evidence of their greatness.
But here's the thing:
- game ended in a tie. A tie!
- sure, NE staged an epic comeback. But Atlanta staged an epic beatdown ... for part of the game until NE stormed back.
- the game was tie, in regulation. A tie!
- OT comes ... and a coin flip. A coin flip! that NE wins. They get the choice to either attack or defend ... what moron would defend when the rule is that if you score a touchdown it's all over and the other team has zero chance to respond?
Is that right? Am I missing something?
In the NBA, if a game ends in a tie, there's OT. Doesn't matter if one team is playing great, builds a 30 pt lead ... then the other team catches fire and scores 30 points unanswered. It ends in a tie.
Then .... the team that stormed back wins a coin flip! They get to shoot a free throw and they sink it. They win the NBA championship! The other team has no opportunity to shoot a free throw because the other team already went first based on a coin flip and sunk theirs. Game over ... it's history.
Or hockey. Game ends in regulation in a tie. One team wins a coin flip and gets to shoot first in a penalty-shot situation. They score ... and win the Stanley Cup! The other team has no chance to shoot and tie it up.
I don't understand why football has these apologists ... I don't get it.
So, what's your opinion?
Driving the length of the field and getting a score. Other team failed to get the stop. That's fine.
How come the other team doesn't get the chance to do the same?
Based on who won the coin flip?
The current NFL OT is really fucking stupid. They should be like every single other pro sport in the planet that uses a clock in a knockout scenario and play a timed OT.
15 more minutes. If it's still tied after that the first score wins. -
I think each team should pick 5 guys to take an extra point. Like a shootout or something.
-
PurpleJ said:
I think each team should pick 3 guys to take an extra point. Like a shootout or something.
-
The team with the most intimidating Haka dance should be declared the victor.
-
surprised so many here are fans of the NFL OT
-
What's wrong with it? The old OT when a FG could win it was shitty.Gladstone said:surprised so many here are fans of the NFL OT
-
Both of the formats are bad. The NCAA format leads to massive number of overtimes while the NFL format has the one team with possession possibility.Gladstone said:surprised so many here are fans of the NFL OT
What really matters is that the losing team in either format has nothing to whine about because they had 60 minutes to win the game outright in the first place. -
No. 5 shooters like in REAL football.TierbsHsotBoobs said:PurpleJ said:I think each team should pick 3 guys to take an extra point. Like a shootout or something.





