Sports Illustrated ranks UW class #20

DerekJohnson

foxsports.com/college-football/story/sport-illustrated-ranks-washington-husky-recruiting-class-20th-in-nation-012517?cmpid=feed:-sports-CQ-RSS-Feed

doogie

If your classes are relatively balanced, your development program is excellent and the character of the kids you recruited can handle the stress, 20th should be all you need.

MelloDawg

doogie said:

If your classes are relatively balanced, your development program is excellent and the character of the kids you recruited can handle the stress, 20th should be all you need.

Sounds like something you'd say if you were in the WAC Petersen!!!!!!!!!

TierbsHsotBoobs

"You can't flag a moderator's post, even when he posts NAMBLA shit on the wrong bored."

DeepSeaZ

Sports Illustrated is still a thing?

Baseman

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

"You can't flag a moderator's post, even when he posts NAMBLA shit on the wrong bored."

I've tried flagging him because your contribution icon still doesn't show. Mods?

GrundleStiltzkin

20th is a disappointment.

BearsWiin

GrundleStiltzkin said:

20th is a disappointment.

Massive. If Washington is BACK!, why aren't the top recruits flocking?

bananasnblondes

Average star rating, offers, and class balance is what you need to look at, not this numerical rank bullshit.

Sark had a "top 10" class one year that was way worse than this one. It had the high ranking because he took 30 kids and filled the class with a bunch of guys like James Atoe and Cooper Pelleur, and guys who had no chance of getting in

chuck

#20 is fine as a rule but is a bit of a letdown for this year. Momentum a few months ago pointed toward a possible top 10 rating. It really fizzled and they didn't close on any big name guys who were deciding late.

BearsWiin

bananasnblondes said:

Average star rating, offers, and class balance is what you need to look at, not this numerical rank bullshit.

Sark had a "top 10" class one year that was way worse than this one. It had the high ranking because he took 30 kids and filled the class with a bunch of guys like James Atoe and Cooper Pelleur, and guys who had no chance of getting in

It sounds like you think the two are mutually exclusive.

You* need playmakers. Did you* get any?

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

Thanks Taft.

UWhuskytskeet

BearsWiin said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

20th is a disappointment.

Massive. If Washington is BACK!, why aren't the top recruits flocking?

They are flocking. To USC.

Dennis_DeYoung

bananasnblondes said:

Average star rating, offers, and class balance is what you need to look at, not this numerical rank bullshit.

Sark had a "top 10" class one year that was way worse than this one. It had the high ranking because he took 30 kids and filled the class with a bunch of guys like James Atoe and Cooper Pelleur, and guys who had no chance of getting in

No he didn't.

Baseman

bananasnblondes said:

Average star rating, offers, and class balance is what you need to look at, not this numerical rank bullshit.

Sark had a "top 10" class one year that was way worse than this one. It had the high ranking because he took 30 kids and filled the class with a bunch of guys like James Atoe and Cooper Pelleur, and guys who had no chance of getting in

Until the morning of signing day

Pitchfork51

Ranking classes before signing day is special

doogie

GrundleStiltzkin said:

20th is a disappointment.

Because the opinions of Kim, fetters and Ruth regarding a 17 year old kids athletecism and capability to develop into a productive college football player is really all that matters

PurpleJ

Sark had a lot of highly rated classes IIRC. The difference is player development.

Following recruiting is for fags.

dnc

doogie said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

20th is a disappointment.

Because the opinions of Kim, fetters and Ruth regarding a 17 year old kids athletecism and capability to develop into a productive college football player is really all that matters

None of those fucks works for SI

Kaepsknee

Pitchfork51 said:

Ranking classes before signing day is special

Agreed.

Still some WSU recruits to pilfer.

chuck

PurpleJ said:

Sark had a lot of highly rated classes IIRC. The difference is player development.

Following recruiting is for fags.

Common myth. His classes were in the top 30 because there were so many players in them. He surrounded a few guys with high ratings with a bunch of plan D guys and Fetters 3* for whom UW was the only major offer.