He is. That's why UW was his favorite team growing up.
His dads lost to UW every time he played us.
is it one of those daddy wasn't there type an issue ?
Dad(s) was there. He said, "shit kid, if you don't want to get your ass whipped in the N every year you have one choice and it's not the Cougs. Also, Strausser puts kids less talented than you in the league and do you really want to play in a run down stadium for @SonnyDykes who gives his team shirts that say "TUFFER TEAM WINS" and then loses? Christ, go to UW kid!"
Only that someone said the roster is at 84 with the current commits included and a few more offers have gone out the last few weeks (including at least one after word came that Vea was considering the Pros).
His offer list is generally low end Pac-12 and below. Having only watched his highlights, I don't really see why he isn't a bit better regarded than that.
If this was a typical late Sark offer, I'd assume the guy has terrible grades, a shit attitude, or takes tons of plays off. Or all of the above! But Petersen doesn't offer guys like that. So I am a bit nonplussed.
One thing to remember is that as a junior he was like 6-2 and sucked. He's grown really quickly.
I fucking love him.
I think if you are just going on senior tape, he's a 4-star kid.
Unlike our buttfucked OL recruiting, though, a lot of top tier P12 schools had a bunch of great players they were on or had committed prior to the season.
Would I rather have the class we SHOULD'VE had? Fozzy, AVT and Henry? Of course.
But these aren't fucking Coleman Shelton asswipes. These are the kind of kids big time schools take when they don't get their front line guys: rare humans with rare physical ability.
If we can coach worth a shit on the OL (we probably can) guys like Norgaard and Ford hit more often than miss and people are like "where the fuck did this guy come from?"
Only that someone said the roster is at 84 with the current commits included and a few more offers have gone out the last few weeks (including at least one after word came that Vea was considering the Pros).
His offer list is generally low end Pac-12 and below. Having only watched his highlights, I don't really see why he isn't a bit better regarded than that.
If this was a typical late Sark offer, I'd assume the guy has terrible grades, a shit attitude, or takes tons of plays off. Or all of the above! But Petersen doesn't offer guys like that. So I am a bit nonplussed.
One thing to remember is that as a junior he was like 6-2 and sucked. He's grown really quickly.
I fucking love him.
I think if you are just going on senior tape, he's a 4-star kid.
Unlike our buttfucked OL recruiting, though, a lot of top tier P12 schools had a bunch of great players they were on or had committed prior to the season.
Would I rather have the class we SHOULD'VE had? Fozzy, AVT and Henry? Of course.
But these aren't fucking Coleman Shelton asswipes. These are the kind of kids big time schools take when they don't get their front line guys: rare humans with rare physical ability.
If we can coach worth a shit on the OL (we probably can) guys like Norgaard and Ford hit more often than miss and people are like "where the fuck did this guy come from?"
What is your logic on Vita being gone?
not at the same position.
these offers could easily be moving on from guys like jackson/sarrell/johnson or a response to transfers, retirements, etc
Only that someone said the roster is at 84 with the current commits included and a few more offers have gone out the last few weeks (including at least one after word came that Vea was considering the Pros).
His offer list is generally low end Pac-12 and below. Having only watched his highlights, I don't really see why he isn't a bit better regarded than that.
If this was a typical late Sark offer, I'd assume the guy has terrible grades, a shit attitude, or takes tons of plays off. Or all of the above! But Petersen doesn't offer guys like that. So I am a bit nonplussed.
One thing to remember is that as a junior he was like 6-2 and sucked. He's grown really quickly.
I fucking love him.
I think if you are just going on senior tape, he's a 4-star kid.
Unlike our buttfucked OL recruiting, though, a lot of top tier P12 schools had a bunch of great players they were on or had committed prior to the season.
Would I rather have the class we SHOULD'VE had? Fozzy, AVT and Henry? Of course.
But these aren't fucking Coleman Shelton asswipes. These are the kind of kids big time schools take when they don't get their front line guys: rare humans with rare physical ability.
If we can coach worth a shit on the OL (we probably can) guys like Norgaard and Ford hit more often than miss and people are like "where the fuck did this guy come from?"
What is your logic on Vita being gone?
not at the same position.
these offers could easily be moving on from guys like jackson/sarrell/johnson or a response to transfers, retirements, etc
You don't really recruit the same position though. It's not like "oh we lost a DT, now we have to go get a DT"
Only that someone said the roster is at 84 with the current commits included and a few more offers have gone out the last few weeks (including at least one after word came that Vea was considering the Pros).
His offer list is generally low end Pac-12 and below. Having only watched his highlights, I don't really see why he isn't a bit better regarded than that.
If this was a typical late Sark offer, I'd assume the guy has terrible grades, a shit attitude, or takes tons of plays off. Or all of the above! But Petersen doesn't offer guys like that. So I am a bit nonplussed.
One thing to remember is that as a junior he was like 6-2 and sucked. He's grown really quickly.
I fucking love him.
I think if you are just going on senior tape, he's a 4-star kid.
Unlike our buttfucked OL recruiting, though, a lot of top tier P12 schools had a bunch of great players they were on or had committed prior to the season.
Would I rather have the class we SHOULD'VE had? Fozzy, AVT and Henry? Of course.
But these aren't fucking Coleman Shelton asswipes. These are the kind of kids big time schools take when they don't get their front line guys: rare humans with rare physical ability.
If we can coach worth a shit on the OL (we probably can) guys like Norgaard and Ford hit more often than miss and people are like "where the fuck did this guy come from?"
What is your logic on Vita being gone?
There's also attrition that isn't accounted for anywhere
Only that someone said the roster is at 84 with the current commits included and a few more offers have gone out the last few weeks (including at least one after word came that Vea was considering the Pros).
His offer list is generally low end Pac-12 and below. Having only watched his highlights, I don't really see why he isn't a bit better regarded than that.
If this was a typical late Sark offer, I'd assume the guy has terrible grades, a shit attitude, or takes tons of plays off. Or all of the above! But Petersen doesn't offer guys like that. So I am a bit nonplussed.
One thing to remember is that as a junior he was like 6-2 and sucked. He's grown really quickly.
I fucking love him.
I think if you are just going on senior tape, he's a 4-star kid.
Unlike our buttfucked OL recruiting, though, a lot of top tier P12 schools had a bunch of great players they were on or had committed prior to the season.
Would I rather have the class we SHOULD'VE had? Fozzy, AVT and Henry? Of course.
But these aren't fucking Coleman Shelton asswipes. These are the kind of kids big time schools take when they don't get their front line guys: rare humans with rare physical ability.
If we can coach worth a shit on the OL (we probably can) guys like Norgaard and Ford hit more often than miss and people are like "where the fuck did this guy come from?"
What is your logic on Vita being gone?
There's also attrition that isn't accounted for anywhere
Only that someone said the roster is at 84 with the current commits included and a few more offers have gone out the last few weeks (including at least one after word came that Vea was considering the Pros).
His offer list is generally low end Pac-12 and below. Having only watched his highlights, I don't really see why he isn't a bit better regarded than that.
If this was a typical late Sark offer, I'd assume the guy has terrible grades, a shit attitude, or takes tons of plays off. Or all of the above! But Petersen doesn't offer guys like that. So I am a bit nonplussed.
One thing to remember is that as a junior he was like 6-2 and sucked. He's grown really quickly.
I fucking love him.
I think if you are just going on senior tape, he's a 4-star kid.
Unlike our buttfucked OL recruiting, though, a lot of top tier P12 schools had a bunch of great players they were on or had committed prior to the season.
Would I rather have the class we SHOULD'VE had? Fozzy, AVT and Henry? Of course.
But these aren't fucking Coleman Shelton asswipes. These are the kind of kids big time schools take when they don't get their front line guys: rare humans with rare physical ability.
If we can coach worth a shit on the OL (we probably can) guys like Norgaard and Ford hit more often than miss and people are like "where the fuck did this guy come from?"
What is your logic on Vita being gone?
not at the same position.
these offers could easily be moving on from guys like jackson/sarrell/johnson or a response to transfers, retirements, etc
You don't really recruit the same position though. It's not like "oh we lost a DT, now we have to go get a DT"
I've never seen another staff that is closer to doing exactly that.
Comments
His dad lost to UW every time he played us.
these offers could easily be moving on from guys like jackson/sarrell/johnson or a response to transfers, retirements, etc