Softy interview w/ Ryan Fowler
Also, he wasn't all that impressed with the UW d-line but thought the secondary looked pretty good. Can't see any scenario where Washington wins the game. The Alabama defense in his opinion is the best he has ever seen. Mentioned the offense is "OK" and there isn't a single RB on bama that could hold Derrick Henry's jock strap.
He did say the SEC was atrocious this year. Browning will be the best QB they will have faced.
Worth a listen.
I also suggest listening to the Petros Papadakis interview from today as well. It was actually really good. Bagged on Pete Carroll pretty good. Finds Pete insufferable...haha. It's good chit.
Comments
-
34-17 or GTFO Tuscaloosa radio dude.
-
He doesn't watch pac-10 games obviously. probably based this on that psalm wooching highlight video.jecornel said:Tuscaloosa radio dude, predicts 35-17 bama.
Also, he wasn't all that impressed with the UW d-line -
Petros isn't the best announcer but he is pretty funny on the radio. Still like him after he basically said Sark needs to be fired during the halftime segment of the 2013 Apple Cup.
-
There's not a single person tied to the SEC that thinks that some school from the pussy PC liberal ass west coast could ever roll with the tide #fact
-
WTF vote for @jecornel for listening to Softy.
-
I used to hate Petros years ago but now I find his weekly interviews on KJR to be the only good thing that station produces.
-
I hate the sound of his voice and agree that he's one of the few announcers who is worth listening to.bananasnblondes said:I used to hate Petros years ago but now I find his weekly interviews on KJR to be the only good thing that station produces.
-
As fat, slovenly Greek pigs go, I have mad man-love for Petros.bananasnblondes said:I used to hate Petros years ago but now I find his weekly interviews on KJR to be the only good thing that station produces.
-
I love these baseless references SEC honks make when SEC teams are the ONLY teams they've ever seen (shout out to Tequilla for my all caps to point where the reader should emphasize with the loud voice in his head).jecornel said:Tuscaloosa radio dude, predicts 35-17 bama.
Also, he wasn't all that impressed with the UW d-line but thought the secondary looked pretty good. Can't see any scenario where Washington wins the game. The Alabama defense in his opinion is the best he has ever seen. Mentioned the offense is "OK" and there isn't a single RB on bama that could hold Derrick Henry's jock strap.
He did say the SEC was atrocious this year. Browning will be the best QB they will have faced.
Worth a listen.
I also suggest listening to the Petros Papadakis interview from today as well. It was actually really good. Bagged on Pete Carroll pretty good. Finds Pete insufferable...haha. It's good chit. -
@Softy hasn't died yet? I was hoping his weight loss was cancer related.
-
FBA related ^^
-
Another guy from Alabama radio on Finebaum I think said not one player on UW's team would start on Alabama. I'm hoping the team actually thinks that also, though I figure Saban may check the film a little better.
-
Alexis said:
Another guy from Alabama radio on Finebaum I think said not one player on UW's team would start on Alabama. I'm hoping the team actually thinks that also, though I figure Saban may check the film a little better.
-
This is an interesting exercise.Alexis said:Another guy from Alabama radio on Finebaum I think said not one player on UW's team would start on Alabama. I'm hoping the team actually thinks that also, though I figure Saban may check the film a little better.
Azeem would start there but he's out for the game so I guess that doesn't count.
Budda would start there.
Sid would start there. King might.
One of the DT's would start there but it's hard to define which of the three is best.
Ross would start there.
Gaskin or Coleman would start there.
Browning would start there.
That's probably it though it's possible Trey would start somewhere on the OL (not at LT though).
So UW will be starting 6, maybe 7 players who would start at Bama. -
The reason Bama fans feel so confident is because most look at the common opponent. USC's defense was able to stifle Washington's offense while Bama rolled them easily. Bama's defense has more talent than USC's and it showed on the field
-
If this transitive bullshit is really the extent of Bama fans analysis then the stereotypes are true.montyfranklyn said:The reason Bama fans feel so confident is because most look at the common opponent. USC's defense was able to stifle Washington's offense while Bama rolled them easily. Bama's defense has more talent than USC's and it showed on the field
It's too bad Saban isn't so short-sighted. -
Although the transitive property isn't the end all be all, it does hold merit. Washington struggles when they face better defenses as every team does, we saw this in the USC game. Well Bama has a very good defense. Bama defense strives on facing pro style teams as well. The last time Bama lost to a pro style team was in 2011. Bama can also spread you out on defense and pound you hard with 3 running backs and a strong, fast QB. While Bama hasn't seen a QB as good as Browning, Washington hasn't seen a team as deep as Bama's
-
yeah?montyfranklyn said:The reason Bama fans feel so confident is because most look at the common opponent. USC's defense was able to stifle Washington's offense while Bama rolled them easily. Bama's defense has more talent than USC's and it showed on the field
well bama is shit and your all fags -
USC struggled with Colorado at home while UW beat them by 31. Transitive properties don't work in football.montyfranklyn said:The reason Bama fans feel so confident is because most look at the common opponent. USC's defense was able to stifle Washington's offense while Bama rolled them easily. Bama's defense has more talent than USC's and it showed on the field
-
The rest of your post is decent analysis. Extrapolating that UW could struggle against Bama's defense because they struggled with SC's is decent analysis. Judging anything about UW because of SC's game with Bama is transitive bullshit.montyfranklyn said:Although the transitive property isn't the end all be all, it does hold merit. Washington struggles when they face better defenses as every team does, we saw this in the USC game. Well Bama has a very good defense. Bama defense strives on facing pro style teams as well. The last time Bama lost to a pro style team was in 2011. Bama can also spread you out on defense and pound you hard with 3 running backs and a strong, fast QB. While Bama hasn't seen a QB as good as Browning, Washington hasn't seen a team as deep as Bama's
-
The worst Petros experience was going to an SC basketball game when he was the PA guy. He has gotten 100x more listenable on the radio though.
-
With all due respect, who at Washington could actually start at Bama over a current starter? Maybe your RG and Browning, but that's all I can think of. There is definitely no one that would unseat any of our defensive starters.HuskyJW said:Alexis said:Another guy from Alabama radio on Finebaum I think said not one player on UW's team would start on Alabama. I'm hoping the team actually thinks that also, though I figure Saban may check the film a little better.
-
Our secondary is better than your secondary. At minimum two of our secondary members would start at Bama, probably three of them.montyfranklyn said:
With all due respect, who at Washington could actually start at Bama over a current starter? Maybe your RG and Browning, but that's all I can think of. There is definitely no one that would unseat any of our defensive starters.HuskyJW said:Alexis said:Another guy from Alabama radio on Finebaum I think said not one player on UW's team would start on Alabama. I'm hoping the team actually thinks that also, though I figure Saban may check the film a little better.
There's a good chance one of our RB's would start there as well. And John Ross would absolutely start there.
I do like the "all due respect" statement before declaring your entire team is better than our entire team. Classy as fuck. -
Your secondary is your weakness, and UW has arguably the best secondary in the country. Start looking there.montyfranklyn said:
With all due respect, who at Washington could actually start at Bama over a current starter? Maybe your RG and Browning, but that's all I can think of. There is definitely no one that would unseat any of our defensive starters.HuskyJW said:Alexis said:Another guy from Alabama radio on Finebaum I think said not one player on UW's team would start on Alabama. I'm hoping the team actually thinks that also, though I figure Saban may check the film a little better.
-
They are actually not our weakness. This is a common misconception. Because teams can't run on us most teams just abandon it and start chucking it down field. The more passes that are thrown, the more yards are given up as well as the more chances for picks. Outside of Averertt, what played the best out of all our corners this season, I don't think anyone in the secondary would have been unseated by any of Washington's players.UWhuskytskeet said:
Your secondary is your weakness, and UW has arguably the best secondary in the country. Start looking there.montyfranklyn said:
With all due respect, who at Washington could actually start at Bama over a current starter? Maybe your RG and Browning, but that's all I can think of. There is definitely no one that would unseat any of our defensive starters.HuskyJW said:Alexis said:Another guy from Alabama radio on Finebaum I think said not one player on UW's team would start on Alabama. I'm hoping the team actually thinks that also, though I figure Saban may check the film a little better.
-
Again, this shows you've never actually seen Washington play. Alabama plays 10 or 11 teams who have QBs who can't throw the ball over 10 yards. UW plays maybe 2 teams like that. Your DBs are not better. Stick with the rest of the team, your argument may hold water there, as long as you take out the QB and RB and WR. Other than that, you're totally correct.montyfranklyn said:
They are actually not our weakness. This is a common misconception. Because teams can't run on us most teams just abandon it and start chucking it down field. The more passes that are thrown, the more yards are given up as well as the more chances for picks. Outside of Averertt, what played the best out of all our corners this season, I don't think anyone in the secondary would have been unseated by any of Washington's players.UWhuskytskeet said:
Your secondary is your weakness, and UW has arguably the best secondary in the country. Start looking there.montyfranklyn said:
With all due respect, who at Washington could actually start at Bama over a current starter? Maybe your RG and Browning, but that's all I can think of. There is definitely no one that would unseat any of our defensive starters.HuskyJW said:Alexis said:Another guy from Alabama radio on Finebaum I think said not one player on UW's team would start on Alabama. I'm hoping the team actually thinks that also, though I figure Saban may check the film a little better.
-
Hi there.montyfranklyn said:
They are actually not our weakness. This is a common misconception. Because teams can't run on us most teams just abandon it and start chucking it down field. The more passes that are thrown, the more yards are given up as well as the more chances for picks. Outside of Averertt, what played the best out of all our corners this season, I don't think anyone in the secondary would have been unseated by any of Washington's players.UWhuskytskeet said:
Your secondary is your weakness, and UW has arguably the best secondary in the country. Start looking there.montyfranklyn said:
With all due respect, who at Washington could actually start at Bama over a current starter? Maybe your RG and Browning, but that's all I can think of. There is definitely no one that would unseat any of our defensive starters.HuskyJW said:Alexis said:Another guy from Alabama radio on Finebaum I think said not one player on UW's team would start on Alabama. I'm hoping the team actually thinks that also, though I figure Saban may check the film a little better.
I watched Chad Kelly throw for 420 yards, 3 TDs and no picks against you and none of that was garbage time. Ole Miss never has a running game so that was nothing new. Your secondary is your weakness.
As is your passing offense. Your* still the best team in the country, but those aspects of your game aren't as strong as your running game on both sides or your special teams or your pass rush.
Yes, Washington has players who would start at Alabama. You're clueless if you think otherwise. -
This is actually a really awful post.montyfranklyn said:
They are actually not our weakness. This is a common misconception. Because teams can't run on us most teams just abandon it and start chucking it down field. The more passes that are thrown, the more yards are given up as well as the more chances for picks. Outside of Averertt, what played the best out of all our corners this season, I don't think anyone in the secondary would have been unseated by any of Washington's players.UWhuskytskeet said:
Your secondary is your weakness, and UW has arguably the best secondary in the country. Start looking there.montyfranklyn said:
With all due respect, who at Washington could actually start at Bama over a current starter? Maybe your RG and Browning, but that's all I can think of. There is definitely no one that would unseat any of our defensive starters.HuskyJW said:Alexis said:Another guy from Alabama radio on Finebaum I think said not one player on UW's team would start on Alabama. I'm hoping the team actually thinks that also, though I figure Saban may check the film a little better.
-
BTW, UW didn't allow 300 yards passing in any game this year, despite facing 2 of the top 4 QB's in passing yards for the season.
-
You guys played only 3 good QBs yourselves.
