Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Hillary launches soft coup attempt
Comments
-
I'm embarrassed for you, RaceRaceBannon said:What are the 17 agencies and where is a link showing that Hillary was doing anything other than spreading bullshit for her low info voters here?
That's what I thought
Russia hacked everything but her personal computer? Seriously?
Losers lose losers
https://www.dhs.gov/news/2016/10/07/joint-statement-department-homeland-security-and-office-director-national -
That link should embarrass you
-
Trump is a much more reliable source than DHS. I can't wait until Government data will be reliable again.RaceBannon said:That link should embarrass you
-
So just to clarify your position is that the Director of National Intelligence is acting in a partisan manner and staking his reputation on this public proclamation without any evidence. Is that your position?RaceBannon said:That link should embarrass you
-
What proof can you provide showing these government agencies haven't been politicized?
-
Ironic.doogie said:What proof can you provide showing these government agencies haven't been politicized?
-
Reuters: CIA report is shit and your all fags!
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-intelligence-idUSKBN14204E -
There is no evidence to back up his assertion so yesHardlyClothed said:
So just to clarify your position is that the Director of National Intelligence is acting in a partisan manner and staking his reputation on this public proclamation without any evidence. Is that your position?RaceBannon said:That link should embarrass you
Are you in with the simpletons that only Hillary's unsecured server couldn't be hacked? -
It has been re2001400ex said:
Ironic.RaceBannon said:
The Russians hacked the election and the DNC server but were unable to crack Hillary's bathtub unsecured server2001400ex said:
Unless you are ignorant to reality, you'd know that no one hacked Hillary's emails. They were made public by the Republican Congress.droggins said:The real issue isn't that Wikileaks released emails or the reasons for Russia hacking them or...etc. It's that H and the DNC let themselves be hacked. Period. That's the real issue. They fucked up and didn't secure their information.
It matters very little their hacker's intention to use the information. They spread this propoganda to deflect from the real issue of them failing to secure their information.
It's obvious they are ignorant about cyber security. These old people have know idea what they are dealing with.
Ignorant to reality is your middle fucking name
Race you are better than that. If Hillary's server were hacked, all that shit would have been released.
Odd FBI said it was hacked.2001400ex said:
Her server wasn't hacked. Adjust your tin foil hat.RaceBannon said:What are the 17 agencies and where is a link showing that Hillary was doing anything other than spreading bullshit for her low info voters here?
That's what I thought
Russia hacked everything but her personal computer? Seriously?
Losers lose losers
I do remember you cheerleading a supposed late October surprise to release her hacked shit. That clearly never happened
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/11/03/sources-99-percent-chance-foreign-intel-agencies-breached-clinton-server.html -
"ODNI is not arguing that the agency (CIA) is wrong, only that they can't prove intent," said one of the three U.S. officials. "Of course they can't, absent agents in on the decision-making in Moscow."doogie said:Reuters: CIA report is shit and your all fags!
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-intelligence-idUSKBN14204E -
Okay, great. We have now established that your opinion is "Southern California man knows more about cyber espionage than the cybersecurity forensic experts at the NSA, CIA, DHS, etc." So we can now conclude that your opinion is worthless. Thanks for playing.RaceBannon said:
There is no evidence to back up his assertion so yesHardlyClothed said:
So just to clarify your position is that the Director of National Intelligence is acting in a partisan manner and staking his reputation on this public proclamation without any evidence. Is that your position?RaceBannon said:That link should embarrass you
Are you in with the simpletons that only Hillary's unsecured server couldn't be hacked?
As for Hillary, it's entirely possible that the server was compromised. The forensic people at the FBI didn't see any clear indication of that, however. But this isn't about Hillary anyway, buddy. -
what is it about?
-
Did you even read the article?doogie said:Reuters: CIA report is shit and your all fags!
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-intelligence-idUSKBN14204E
While the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) does not dispute the CIA's analysis of Russian hacking operations, it has not endorsed their assessment because of a lack of conclusive evidence that Moscow intended to boost Trump over Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton, said the officials, who declined to be named. -
Of course it is about Hillary. She spent years lying about her private server and classified emails and saying there is nothing to investigate and it wasn't hacked.HardlyClothed said:
Okay, great. We have now established that your opinion is "Southern California man knows more about cyber espionage than the cybersecurity forensic experts at the NSA, CIA, DHS, etc." So we can now conclude that your opinion is worthless. Thanks for playing.RaceBannon said:
There is no evidence to back up his assertion so yesHardlyClothed said:
So just to clarify your position is that the Director of National Intelligence is acting in a partisan manner and staking his reputation on this public proclamation without any evidence. Is that your position?RaceBannon said:That link should embarrass you
Are you in with the simpletons that only Hillary's unsecured server couldn't be hacked?
As for Hillary, it's entirely possible that the server was compromised. The forensic people at the FBI didn't see any clear indication of that, however. But this isn't about Hillary anyway, buddy.
Now she is saying the Russians hacked the entire election. Anyone with half a brain realizes how stupid that is.
One partisan agency under the corrupt hack Obama says it sure looks like the Russians and all the low info type start repeating the bullshit
The RNC wasn't hacked.
Assange is the guy that has an ax to grind with the democrats and he ground it. The truth of what he revealed hurt HIllary because she and the DNC did all that shit
The SOS emails that China and Russia hacked off her server are being held. She lost much to your surprise.
Trump won. Get over it.
The only candidate proven to be in hold to a foreign power for money was HIllary. When you are guilty accuse your opponent of what you did. The low info types fall for it every time
I may or may not be smart. All we know is that I am smarter than you -
-
Oh man, there's nowhere to even begin with this incoherent mess. No one has embraced the post-truth world more than Race, it seems. This drivel does not even dignify a response. Fortunately for everyone else, Race is harmless. He's just a senile old man posting batshit political opinions on the political section of a college football message board. He and Hondo and the rest here are free to yell theiry shitty takes at each other. That's what makes America great. You're welcome for the perspective.RaceBannon said:
Of course it is about Hillary. She spent years lying about her private server and classified emails and saying there is nothing to investigate and it wasn't hacked.HardlyClothed said:
Okay, great. We have now established that your opinion is "Southern California man knows more about cyber espionage than the cybersecurity forensic experts at the NSA, CIA, DHS, etc." So we can now conclude that your opinion is worthless. Thanks for playing.RaceBannon said:
There is no evidence to back up his assertion so yesHardlyClothed said:
So just to clarify your position is that the Director of National Intelligence is acting in a partisan manner and staking his reputation on this public proclamation without any evidence. Is that your position?RaceBannon said:That link should embarrass you
Are you in with the simpletons that only Hillary's unsecured server couldn't be hacked?
As for Hillary, it's entirely possible that the server was compromised. The forensic people at the FBI didn't see any clear indication of that, however. But this isn't about Hillary anyway, buddy.
Now she is saying the Russians hacked the entire election. Anyone with half a brain realizes how stupid that is.
One partisan agency under the corrupt hack Obama says it sure looks like the Russians and all the low info type start repeating the bullshit
The RNC wasn't hacked.
Assange is the guy that has an ax to grind with the democrats and he ground it. The truth of what he revealed hurt HIllary because she and the DNC did all that shit
The SOS emails that China and Russia hacked off her server are being held. She lost much to your surprise.
Trump won. Get over it.
The only candidate proven to be in hold to a foreign power for money was HIllary. When you are guilty accuse your opponent of what you did. The low info types fall for it every time
I may or may not be smart. All we know is that I am smarter than you -
In other words, I got nothing to dispute what Race wrote so I'll just lob insults and hope no one notices.HardlyClothed said:
Oh man, there's nowhere to even begin with this incoherent mess. No one has embraced the post-truth world more than Race, it seems. This drivel does not even dignify a response. Fortunately for everyone else, Race is harmless. He's just a senile old man posting batshit political opinions on the political section of a college football message board. He and Hondo and the rest here are free to yell theiry shitty takes at each other. That's what makes America great. You're welcome for the perspective.RaceBannon said:
Of course it is about Hillary. She spent years lying about her private server and classified emails and saying there is nothing to investigate and it wasn't hacked.HardlyClothed said:
Okay, great. We have now established that your opinion is "Southern California man knows more about cyber espionage than the cybersecurity forensic experts at the NSA, CIA, DHS, etc." So we can now conclude that your opinion is worthless. Thanks for playing.RaceBannon said:
There is no evidence to back up his assertion so yesHardlyClothed said:
So just to clarify your position is that the Director of National Intelligence is acting in a partisan manner and staking his reputation on this public proclamation without any evidence. Is that your position?RaceBannon said:That link should embarrass you
Are you in with the simpletons that only Hillary's unsecured server couldn't be hacked?
As for Hillary, it's entirely possible that the server was compromised. The forensic people at the FBI didn't see any clear indication of that, however. But this isn't about Hillary anyway, buddy.
Now she is saying the Russians hacked the entire election. Anyone with half a brain realizes how stupid that is.
One partisan agency under the corrupt hack Obama says it sure looks like the Russians and all the low info type start repeating the bullshit
The RNC wasn't hacked.
Assange is the guy that has an ax to grind with the democrats and he ground it. The truth of what he revealed hurt HIllary because she and the DNC did all that shit
The SOS emails that China and Russia hacked off her server are being held. She lost much to your surprise.
Trump won. Get over it.
The only candidate proven to be in hold to a foreign power for money was HIllary. When you are guilty accuse your opponent of what you did. The low info types fall for it every time
I may or may not be smart. All we know is that I am smarter than you
Loser -
RaceBannon said:
Of course it is about Hillary. She spent years lying about her private server and classified emails and saying there is nothing to investigate and it wasn't hacked.HardlyClothed said:
Okay, great. We have now established that your opinion is "Southern California man knows more about cyber espionage than the cybersecurity forensic experts at the NSA, CIA, DHS, etc." So we can now conclude that your opinion is worthless. Thanks for playing.RaceBannon said:
There is no evidence to back up his assertion so yesHardlyClothed said:
So just to clarify your position is that the Director of National Intelligence is acting in a partisan manner and staking his reputation on this public proclamation without any evidence. Is that your position?RaceBannon said:That link should embarrass you
Are you in with the simpletons that only Hillary's unsecured server couldn't be hacked?
As for Hillary, it's entirely possible that the server was compromised. The forensic people at the FBI didn't see any clear indication of that, however. But this isn't about Hillary anyway, buddy.
Now she is saying the Russians hacked the entire election. Anyone with half a brain realizes how stupid that is.
One partisan agency under the corrupt hack Obama says it sure looks like the Russians and all the low info type start repeating the bullshit
The RNC wasn't hacked.
Assange is the guy that has an ax to grind with the democrats and he ground it. The truth of what he revealed hurt HIllary because she and the DNC did all that shit
The SOS emails that China and Russia hacked off her server are being held. She lost much to your surprise.
Trump won. Get over it.
The only candidate proven to be in hold to a foreign power for money was HIllary. When you are guilty accuse your opponent of what you did. The low info types fall for it every time
I may or may not be smart. All we know is that I am smarter than you
-
When you start out with "now she is saying the Russians hacked the entire election", there is no reason to engage you further. The "entire, ENTIRE, election"? When you're operating on a set of facts completely unmoored from reality, engagement isn't worth my time. It's pointless.RaceBannon said:
In other words, I got nothing to dispute what Race wrote so I'll just lob insults and hope no one notices.HardlyClothed said:
Oh man, there's nowhere to even begin with this incoherent mess. No one has embraced the post-truth world more than Race, it seems. This drivel does not even dignify a response. Fortunately for everyone else, Race is harmless. He's just a senile old man posting batshit political opinions on the political section of a college football message board. He and Hondo and the rest here are free to yell theiry shitty takes at each other. That's what makes America great. You're welcome for the perspective.RaceBannon said:
Of course it is about Hillary. She spent years lying about her private server and classified emails and saying there is nothing to investigate and it wasn't hacked.HardlyClothed said:
Okay, great. We have now established that your opinion is "Southern California man knows more about cyber espionage than the cybersecurity forensic experts at the NSA, CIA, DHS, etc." So we can now conclude that your opinion is worthless. Thanks for playing.RaceBannon said:
There is no evidence to back up his assertion so yesHardlyClothed said:
So just to clarify your position is that the Director of National Intelligence is acting in a partisan manner and staking his reputation on this public proclamation without any evidence. Is that your position?RaceBannon said:That link should embarrass you
Are you in with the simpletons that only Hillary's unsecured server couldn't be hacked?
As for Hillary, it's entirely possible that the server was compromised. The forensic people at the FBI didn't see any clear indication of that, however. But this isn't about Hillary anyway, buddy.
Now she is saying the Russians hacked the entire election. Anyone with half a brain realizes how stupid that is.
One partisan agency under the corrupt hack Obama says it sure looks like the Russians and all the low info type start repeating the bullshit
The RNC wasn't hacked.
Assange is the guy that has an ax to grind with the democrats and he ground it. The truth of what he revealed hurt HIllary because she and the DNC did all that shit
The SOS emails that China and Russia hacked off her server are being held. She lost much to your surprise.
Trump won. Get over it.
The only candidate proven to be in hold to a foreign power for money was HIllary. When you are guilty accuse your opponent of what you did. The low info types fall for it every time
I may or may not be smart. All we know is that I am smarter than you
Loser -
I see Hondo joined in on the surrender to my brilliance
If either of you boys ever have a point be sure and let us know -
Yore trying too hard.RaceBannon said:I see Hondo joined in on the surrender to my brilliance
If either of you boys ever have a point be sure and let us know -
I'm not trying at all and I blew up your little circle jerk with basic logic
-
No. You didn't in any way.RaceBannon said:I'm not trying at all and I blew up your little circle jerk with basic logic
-
You have a perspective?RaceBannon said:
In other words, I got nothing to dispute what Race wrote so I'll just lob insults and hope no one notices.HardlyClothed said:
Oh man, there's nowhere to even begin with this incoherent mess. No one has embraced the post-truth world more than Race, it seems. This drivel does not even dignify a response. Fortunately for everyone else, Race is harmless. He's just a senile old man posting batshit political opinions on the political section of a college football message board. He and Hondo and the rest here are free to yell theiry shitty takes at each other. That's what makes America great. You're welcome for the perspective.RaceBannon said:
Of course it is about Hillary. She spent years lying about her private server and classified emails and saying there is nothing to investigate and it wasn't hacked.HardlyClothed said:
Okay, great. We have now established that your opinion is "Southern California man knows more about cyber espionage than the cybersecurity forensic experts at the NSA, CIA, DHS, etc." So we can now conclude that your opinion is worthless. Thanks for playing.RaceBannon said:
There is no evidence to back up his assertion so yesHardlyClothed said:
So just to clarify your position is that the Director of National Intelligence is acting in a partisan manner and staking his reputation on this public proclamation without any evidence. Is that your position?RaceBannon said:That link should embarrass you
Are you in with the simpletons that only Hillary's unsecured server couldn't be hacked?
As for Hillary, it's entirely possible that the server was compromised. The forensic people at the FBI didn't see any clear indication of that, however. But this isn't about Hillary anyway, buddy.
Now she is saying the Russians hacked the entire election. Anyone with half a brain realizes how stupid that is.
One partisan agency under the corrupt hack Obama says it sure looks like the Russians and all the low info type start repeating the bullshit
The RNC wasn't hacked.
Assange is the guy that has an ax to grind with the democrats and he ground it. The truth of what he revealed hurt HIllary because she and the DNC did all that shit
The SOS emails that China and Russia hacked off her server are being held. She lost much to your surprise.
Trump won. Get over it.
The only candidate proven to be in hold to a foreign power for money was HIllary. When you are guilty accuse your opponent of what you did. The low info types fall for it every time
I may or may not be smart. All we know is that I am smarter than you
Loser -
Our government currently has an "intent" problem as that's the supposed reason Hillary's not being tried for treason etc. Guess they applied that stupidity to the Russians as well.UWhuskytskeet said:
"ODNI is not arguing that the agency (CIA) is wrong, only that they can't prove intent," said one of the three U.S. officials. "Of course they can't, absent agents in on the decision-making in Moscow."doogie said:Reuters: CIA report is shit and your all fags!
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-intelligence-idUSKBN14204E
Wiki isn't the work of the Russians. -
Or the fact there's no evidence that Hilary's server was hacked.Sledog said:
Our government currently has an "intent" problem as that's the supposed reason Hillary's not being tried for treason etc. Guess they applied that stupidity to the Russians as well.UWhuskytskeet said:
"ODNI is not arguing that the agency (CIA) is wrong, only that they can't prove intent," said one of the three U.S. officials. "Of course they can't, absent agents in on the decision-making in Moscow."doogie said:Reuters: CIA report is shit and your all fags!
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-intelligence-idUSKBN14204E
Wiki isn't the work of the Russians.
And yes intent is required for gross negligence. That's a legal thing and one that everyone but tards like you agree with. -
This thread delivers!!!
Said noone fucking ever.
'insert forks to eyes meme here' -
There's no evidence for anything you posted in this thread either but it didn't stop you2001400ex said:
Or the fact there's no evidence that Hilary's server was hacked.Sledog said:
Our government currently has an "intent" problem as that's the supposed reason Hillary's not being tried for treason etc. Guess they applied that stupidity to the Russians as well.UWhuskytskeet said:
"ODNI is not arguing that the agency (CIA) is wrong, only that they can't prove intent," said one of the three U.S. officials. "Of course they can't, absent agents in on the decision-making in Moscow."doogie said:Reuters: CIA report is shit and your all fags!
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-intelligence-idUSKBN14204E
Wiki isn't the work of the Russians.
And yes intent is required for gross negligence. That's a legal thing and one that everyone but tards like you agree with.
nytimes.com/2016/07/07/us/hillary-clintons-email-was-probably-hacked-experts-say.html?_r=0
Any other lies today or are we done here? -
Did it read the article or just the headline?RaceBannon said:
There's no evidence for anything you posted in this thread either but it didn't stop you2001400ex said:
Or the fact there's no evidence that Hilary's server was hacked.Sledog said:
Our government currently has an "intent" problem as that's the supposed reason Hillary's not being tried for treason etc. Guess they applied that stupidity to the Russians as well.UWhuskytskeet said:
"ODNI is not arguing that the agency (CIA) is wrong, only that they can't prove intent," said one of the three U.S. officials. "Of course they can't, absent agents in on the decision-making in Moscow."doogie said:Reuters: CIA report is shit and your all fags!
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-intelligence-idUSKBN14204E
Wiki isn't the work of the Russians.
And yes intent is required for gross negligence. That's a legal thing and one that everyone but tards like you agree with.
nytimes.com/2016/07/07/us/hillary-clintons-email-was-probably-hacked-experts-say.html?_r=0
Any other lies today or are we done here?
When the F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, said on Tuesday that his investigators had no “direct evidence” that Hillary Clinton’s email account had been “successfully hacked,” both private experts and federal investigators immediately understood his meaning: It very likely had been breached, but the intruders were far too skilled to leave evidence of their work.
They "understood the meaning". Haha Race. You are better than this. -
It's the same "proof" you have that the Russians hacked the election.
You really want to keep getting your ass kicked here?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsFR8DbSRQE
