Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Well?

1235

Comments

  • PineapplePirate
    PineapplePirate Member Posts: 4,649
    Parents need to let their kids go. The only reason to stay close to home is if you're dirt poor and can't afford basic needs in college.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,388 Standard Supporter
    Both are good, but I'm honestly not even worried at all
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    RoadDawg55 said:

    Both are good, but I'm honestly not even worried at all

    Reality is, the track record of the coaches is to coach kids up. Look at the first round NFL projections at the beginning of the year, no huskies. Now there are 2-3 that could be in the first round, 3 months later.

    Point is, yes having recruits with stars and shit is cool. But one or two players isn't going to break the team. I'm more worried about a Browning replacement and no one on here seems to be worried even tho we might only have one more year with him.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogville
    doogville Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,243 Swaye's Wigwam
    bananasnblondes said:



    Eklund said this morning that Ty is gone. Utah coaches convinced him he needs to stay close to mommy.

    Like clockwork, Jones reaffirmed his commitment on Twitter.

    I know we only point out when they are wrong, but are the doogman guys *ever* right?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,500
    2001400ex said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Both are good, but I'm honestly not even worried at all

    Reality is, the track record of the coaches is to coach kids up. Look at the first round NFL projections at the beginning of the year, no huskies. Now there are 2-3 that could be in the first round, 3 months later.

    Point is, yes having recruits with stars and shit is cool. But one or two players isn't going to break the team. I'm more worried about a Browning replacement and no one on here seems to be worried even tho we might only have one more year with him.
    There is no chance Browning is a 3 year QB.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    CuntWaffle said:

    2001400ex said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Both are good, but I'm honestly not even worried at all

    Reality is, the track record of the coaches is to coach kids up. Look at the first round NFL projections at the beginning of the year, no huskies. Now there are 2-3 that could be in the first round, 3 months later.

    Point is, yes having recruits with stars and shit is cool. But one or two players isn't going to break the team. I'm more worried about a Browning replacement and no one on here seems to be worried even tho we might only have one more year with him.
    There is no chance Browning is a 3 year QB.
    Then it sounds like we should have a QB on our roster next year to redshirt then sit the following year behind Jake. Either way, the doesn't seem to be a replacement. Maybe we can recruit a Montana state graduate transfer. I hear that's the thing now.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    CuntWaffle said:

    2001400ex said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Both are good, but I'm honestly not even worried at all

    Reality is, the track record of the coaches is to coach kids up. Look at the first round NFL projections at the beginning of the year, no huskies. Now there are 2-3 that could be in the first round, 3 months later.

    Point is, yes having recruits with stars and shit is cool. But one or two players isn't going to break the team. I'm more worried about a Browning replacement and no one on here seems to be worried even tho we might only have one more year with him.
    There is no chance Browning is a 3 year QB.
    it's not no chance. but it's highly unlikely. he'd need to get a lot stronger
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,500
    dhdawg said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    2001400ex said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Both are good, but I'm honestly not even worried at all

    Reality is, the track record of the coaches is to coach kids up. Look at the first round NFL projections at the beginning of the year, no huskies. Now there are 2-3 that could be in the first round, 3 months later.

    Point is, yes having recruits with stars and shit is cool. But one or two players isn't going to break the team. I'm more worried about a Browning replacement and no one on here seems to be worried even tho we might only have one more year with him.
    There is no chance Browning is a 3 year QB.
    it's not no chance. but it's highly unlikely. he'd need to get a lot stronger
    Wrong. There is no chance.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PineapplePirate
    PineapplePirate Member Posts: 4,649
    I always love how these topics turn into something completely unrelated to the original intent. This topic is now about jake browning.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter