Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

The "Powerful" SEC

124»

Comments

  • Options
    SediciSedici Member Posts: 51
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Photogenic First Comment
    phineas said:

    I wish my team could throw for under 100 and win games.

    Defense > some high powered heisman fag offense who gets shut down when facing defensive minded teams

    phineas said:

    I wish my team could throw for under 100 and win games.

    Defense > some high powered heisman fag offense who gets shut down when facing defensive minded teams

    I agree, qb play for Bama marginal at best and yeah the d carries them. They do have a killer running game though if Kiffin wouldn't fuck it up.
  • Options
    tenndawgtenndawg Member Posts: 1,161
    5 Awesomes First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Sedici said:



    UW played 1 very good team and lost 24-7 and another decent team that got annhilated by Bama 52-6. So who did UW beat this year?

    Who did anyone beat ?

    Bama beat USC with 3 losses and every other SEC team they beat had at least 4 losses

    Surpringly Pitt with wins over Clemson and Penn State may have had the best combo of two good wins, but they botched other games...

    College football has always been that way - the best teams start with 7-8 nearly guaranteed wins; a couple should wins, and maybe 1-2 potentially tough games...
  • Options
    SediciSedici Member Posts: 51
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Photogenic First Comment
    Swaye said:

    I think we would have trouble with LSU. They are sort of an outlier in that they have a pedestrian record, but the two games I watched (small sample I know) their D was absolutely on point. Like a gnat's ass hair below Bama. We just don't seem to deal well at all with NFL caliber D (see Bama and USC). Granted, LSU does not have an offense anything like USC, or even Bama, but I still think they would give Jake fits. Then again, LSU is basically Michigan in a better conference. Oh fuck it. What the fuck do I know. I'm drinking.

    No, I think comparing Michigan and lsu pretty realistic. Lsu gets offense and qb and they are very dangerous. Loaded with speed and talent.
  • Options
    TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Combo Breaker 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary
    Sedici said:

    Swaye said:

    I think we would have trouble with LSU. They are sort of an outlier in that they have a pedestrian record, but the two games I watched (small sample I know) their D was absolutely on point. Like a gnat's ass hair below Bama. We just don't seem to deal well at all with NFL caliber D (see Bama and USC). Granted, LSU does not have an offense anything like USC, or even Bama, but I still think they would give Jake fits. Then again, LSU is basically Michigan in a better conference. Oh fuck it. What the fuck do I know. I'm drinking.

    No, I think comparing Michigan and lsu pretty realistic. Lsu gets offense and qb and they are very dangerous. Loaded with speed and talent.
    Michigan lost to Iowa.

    Florida blew Iowa the fuck out.
  • Options
    SediciSedici Member Posts: 51
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Photogenic First Comment

    Sedici said:

    Swaye said:

    I think we would have trouble with LSU. They are sort of an outlier in that they have a pedestrian record, but the two games I watched (small sample I know) their D was absolutely on point. Like a gnat's ass hair below Bama. We just don't seem to deal well at all with NFL caliber D (see Bama and USC). Granted, LSU does not have an offense anything like USC, or even Bama, but I still think they would give Jake fits. Then again, LSU is basically Michigan in a better conference. Oh fuck it. What the fuck do I know. I'm drinking.

    No, I think comparing Michigan and lsu pretty realistic. Lsu gets offense and qb and they are very dangerous. Loaded with speed and talent.
    Michigan lost to Iowa.

    Florida blew Iowa the fuck out.
    Yeah I get that, but you can't base a matchup on one or two games. I mean Pitt beats Clemson, northwestern beats Pitt, does northwestern beat Clemson?...fuck no
  • Options
    RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,123
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Swaye's Wigwam
    Sedici said:

    Sedici said:

    Swaye said:

    I think we would have trouble with LSU. They are sort of an outlier in that they have a pedestrian record, but the two games I watched (small sample I know) their D was absolutely on point. Like a gnat's ass hair below Bama. We just don't seem to deal well at all with NFL caliber D (see Bama and USC). Granted, LSU does not have an offense anything like USC, or even Bama, but I still think they would give Jake fits. Then again, LSU is basically Michigan in a better conference. Oh fuck it. What the fuck do I know. I'm drinking.

    No, I think comparing Michigan and lsu pretty realistic. Lsu gets offense and qb and they are very dangerous. Loaded with speed and talent.
    Michigan lost to Iowa.

    Florida blew Iowa the fuck out.
    Yeah I get that, but you can't base a matchup on one or two games. I mean Pitt beats Clemson, northwestern beats Pitt, does northwestern beat Clemson?...fuck no
    Boobs is an idiot. Every now and than he will prove that to be wrong, but he just tries to annoy everyone here.
  • Options
    UWhuskytskeetUWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,108
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Answer

    Sedici said:

    Sedici said:

    Swaye said:

    I think we would have trouble with LSU. They are sort of an outlier in that they have a pedestrian record, but the two games I watched (small sample I know) their D was absolutely on point. Like a gnat's ass hair below Bama. We just don't seem to deal well at all with NFL caliber D (see Bama and USC). Granted, LSU does not have an offense anything like USC, or even Bama, but I still think they would give Jake fits. Then again, LSU is basically Michigan in a better conference. Oh fuck it. What the fuck do I know. I'm drinking.

    No, I think comparing Michigan and lsu pretty realistic. Lsu gets offense and qb and they are very dangerous. Loaded with speed and talent.
    Michigan lost to Iowa.

    Florida blew Iowa the fuck out.
    Yeah I get that, but you can't base a matchup on one or two games. I mean Pitt beats Clemson, northwestern beats Pitt, does northwestern beat Clemson?...fuck no
    Boobs is an idiot. Every now and than he will prove that to be wrong, but he just tries to annoy everyone here.
  • Options
    EwaDawgEwaDawg Member Posts: 4,006
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    edited January 2017
  • Options
    Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,938
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Founders Club
    EwaDawg said:

    .

    You had to edit that?
  • Options
    Crimsonite1Crimsonite1 Member Posts: 98
    Name Dropper 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    SEC arguments are dumb because they have the most talent. They put the most players in the NFL and have the best program in football.

    That said, their style of football is shit. I love this UW team so much because they do it all and actually shut down legitimate passing attacks. It's a much more entertaining brand of football.

    I enjoy watching USC, Stanford, and Oregon (before this year). Oregon State will be fun to watch too. The PAC 12 has the best variety of teams and styles.

    All of our defensive stats would be better in the SEC. It's amazing how bad most of the offenses in that conference are.

    Colorado 10, Stanford 5
    Have you ever watched Florida Boobie? What about LSU? Who is fun to watch in the SEC?
    You need to watch their Bowl games. That offenseless Florida and LSU looked pretty good away from SEC defenses - Kinda like Washington. LMAO!
  • Options
    SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,069
    First Anniversary Combo Breaker 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club

    SEC arguments are dumb because they have the most talent. They put the most players in the NFL and have the best program in football.

    That said, their style of football is shit. I love this UW team so much because they do it all and actually shut down legitimate passing attacks. It's a much more entertaining brand of football.

    I enjoy watching USC, Stanford, and Oregon (before this year). Oregon State will be fun to watch too. The PAC 12 has the best variety of teams and styles.

    All of our defensive stats would be better in the SEC. It's amazing how bad most of the offenses in that conference are.

    Colorado 10, Stanford 5
    Have you ever watched Florida Boobie? What about LSU? Who is fun to watch in the SEC?
    You need to watch their Bowl games. That offenseless Florida and LSU looked pretty good away from SEC defenses - Kinda like Washington. LMAO!
    Is it Friday yet?
  • Options
    creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,749
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Photogenic
    EwaDawg said:

    .

    probably your best work to date. Engrish words are not your strong suit.
  • Options
    creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,749
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Photogenic
    edited January 2017

    SEC arguments are dumb because they have the most talent. They put the most players in the NFL and have the best program in football.

    That said, their style of football is shit. I love this UW team so much because they do it all and actually shut down legitimate passing attacks. It's a much more entertaining brand of football.

    I enjoy watching USC, Stanford, and Oregon (before this year). Oregon State will be fun to watch too. The PAC 12 has the best variety of teams and styles.

    All of our defensive stats would be better in the SEC. It's amazing how bad most of the offenses in that conference are.

    Colorado 10, Stanford 5
    Have you ever watched Florida Boobie? What about LSU? Who is fun to watch in the SEC?
    You need to watch their Bowl games. That offenseless Florida and LSU looked pretty good away from SEC defenses - Kinda like Washington. LMAO!
    At the end of the day, two things matter more than any of the anal ooze you've dripped on this board: (1) you are a fan of an elephant head in a football helmet; and (2) you're a dumb, poor, uneducated hillbilly from, living and fated to die in, a shit-hole arm pit of a state.

    You simply can't win.
Sign In or Register to comment.