The "Powerful" SEC
Comments
-
phineas said:
I wish my team could throw for under 100 and win games.
Defense > some high powered heisman fag offense who gets shut down when facing defensive minded teams
I agree, qb play for Bama marginal at best and yeah the d carries them. They do have a killer running game though if Kiffin wouldn't fuck it up.phineas said:I wish my team could throw for under 100 and win games.
Defense > some high powered heisman fag offense who gets shut down when facing defensive minded teams -
I think we would have trouble with LSU. They are sort of an outlier in that they have a pedestrian record, but the two games I watched (small sample I know) their D was absolutely on point. Like a gnat's ass hair below Bama. We just don't seem to deal well at all with NFL caliber D (see Bama and USC). Granted, LSU does not have an offense anything like USC, or even Bama, but I still think they would give Jake fits. Then again, LSU is basically Michigan in a better conference. Oh fuck it. What the fuck do I know. I'm drinking.
-
Who did anyone beat ?Sedici said:
UW played 1 very good team and lost 24-7 and another decent team that got annhilated by Bama 52-6. So who did UW beat this year?
Bama beat USC with 3 losses and every other SEC team they beat had at least 4 losses
Surpringly Pitt with wins over Clemson and Penn State may have had the best combo of two good wins, but they botched other games...
College football has always been that way - the best teams start with 7-8 nearly guaranteed wins; a couple should wins, and maybe 1-2 potentially tough games... -
No, I think comparing Michigan and lsu pretty realistic. Lsu gets offense and qb and they are very dangerous. Loaded with speed and talent.Swaye said:I think we would have trouble with LSU. They are sort of an outlier in that they have a pedestrian record, but the two games I watched (small sample I know) their D was absolutely on point. Like a gnat's ass hair below Bama. We just don't seem to deal well at all with NFL caliber D (see Bama and USC). Granted, LSU does not have an offense anything like USC, or even Bama, but I still think they would give Jake fits. Then again, LSU is basically Michigan in a better conference. Oh fuck it. What the fuck do I know. I'm drinking.
-
Michigan lost to Iowa.Sedici said:
No, I think comparing Michigan and lsu pretty realistic. Lsu gets offense and qb and they are very dangerous. Loaded with speed and talent.Swaye said:I think we would have trouble with LSU. They are sort of an outlier in that they have a pedestrian record, but the two games I watched (small sample I know) their D was absolutely on point. Like a gnat's ass hair below Bama. We just don't seem to deal well at all with NFL caliber D (see Bama and USC). Granted, LSU does not have an offense anything like USC, or even Bama, but I still think they would give Jake fits. Then again, LSU is basically Michigan in a better conference. Oh fuck it. What the fuck do I know. I'm drinking.
Florida blew Iowa the fuck out. -
Yeah I get that, but you can't base a matchup on one or two games. I mean Pitt beats Clemson, northwestern beats Pitt, does northwestern beat Clemson?...fuck noTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Michigan lost to Iowa.Sedici said:
No, I think comparing Michigan and lsu pretty realistic. Lsu gets offense and qb and they are very dangerous. Loaded with speed and talent.Swaye said:I think we would have trouble with LSU. They are sort of an outlier in that they have a pedestrian record, but the two games I watched (small sample I know) their D was absolutely on point. Like a gnat's ass hair below Bama. We just don't seem to deal well at all with NFL caliber D (see Bama and USC). Granted, LSU does not have an offense anything like USC, or even Bama, but I still think they would give Jake fits. Then again, LSU is basically Michigan in a better conference. Oh fuck it. What the fuck do I know. I'm drinking.
Florida blew Iowa the fuck out. -
Boobs is an idiot. Every now and than he will prove that to be wrong, but he just tries to annoy everyone here.Sedici said:
Yeah I get that, but you can't base a matchup on one or two games. I mean Pitt beats Clemson, northwestern beats Pitt, does northwestern beat Clemson?...fuck noTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Michigan lost to Iowa.Sedici said:
No, I think comparing Michigan and lsu pretty realistic. Lsu gets offense and qb and they are very dangerous. Loaded with speed and talent.Swaye said:I think we would have trouble with LSU. They are sort of an outlier in that they have a pedestrian record, but the two games I watched (small sample I know) their D was absolutely on point. Like a gnat's ass hair below Bama. We just don't seem to deal well at all with NFL caliber D (see Bama and USC). Granted, LSU does not have an offense anything like USC, or even Bama, but I still think they would give Jake fits. Then again, LSU is basically Michigan in a better conference. Oh fuck it. What the fuck do I know. I'm drinking.
Florida blew Iowa the fuck out. -
RoadDawg55 said:
Boobs is an idiot. Every now and than he will prove that to be wrong, but he just tries to annoy everyoneSedici said:
Yeah I get that, but you can't base a matchup on one or two games. I mean Pitt beats Clemson, northwestern beats Pitt, does northwestern beat Clemson?...fuck noTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Michigan lost to Iowa.Sedici said:
No, I think comparing Michigan and lsu pretty realistic. Lsu gets offense and qb and they are very dangerous. Loaded with speed and talent.Swaye said:I think we would have trouble with LSU. They are sort of an outlier in that they have a pedestrian record, but the two games I watched (small sample I know) their D was absolutely on point. Like a gnat's ass hair below Bama. We just don't seem to deal well at all with NFL caliber D (see Bama and USC). Granted, LSU does not have an offense anything like USC, or even Bama, but I still think they would give Jake fits. Then again, LSU is basically Michigan in a better conference. Oh fuck it. What the fuck do I know. I'm drinking.
Florida blew Iowa the fuck out.here. -
-
You had to edit that?EwaDawg said:.
-
You need to watch their Bowl games. That offenseless Florida and LSU looked pretty good away from SEC defenses - Kinda like Washington. LMAO!RoadDawg55 said:
Have you ever watched Florida Boobie? What about LSU? Who is fun to watch in the SEC?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Colorado 10, Stanford 5RoadDawg55 said:SEC arguments are dumb because they have the most talent. They put the most players in the NFL and have the best program in football.
That said, their style of football is shit. I love this UW team so much because they do it all and actually shut down legitimate passing attacks. It's a much more entertaining brand of football.
I enjoy watching USC, Stanford, and Oregon (before this year). Oregon State will be fun to watch too. The PAC 12 has the best variety of teams and styles.
All of our defensive stats would be better in the SEC. It's amazing how bad most of the offenses in that conference are. -
Is it Friday yet?Crimsonite1 said:
You need to watch their Bowl games. That offenseless Florida and LSU looked pretty good away from SEC defenses - Kinda like Washington. LMAO!RoadDawg55 said:
Have you ever watched Florida Boobie? What about LSU? Who is fun to watch in the SEC?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Colorado 10, Stanford 5RoadDawg55 said:SEC arguments are dumb because they have the most talent. They put the most players in the NFL and have the best program in football.
That said, their style of football is shit. I love this UW team so much because they do it all and actually shut down legitimate passing attacks. It's a much more entertaining brand of football.
I enjoy watching USC, Stanford, and Oregon (before this year). Oregon State will be fun to watch too. The PAC 12 has the best variety of teams and styles.
All of our defensive stats would be better in the SEC. It's amazing how bad most of the offenses in that conference are. -
-
probably your best work to date. Engrish words are not your strong suit.EwaDawg said:.
-
At the end of the day, two things matter more than any of the anal ooze you've dripped on this board: (1) you are a fan of an elephant head in a football helmet; and (2) you're a dumb, poor, uneducated hillbilly from, living and fated to die in, a shit-hole arm pit of a state.Crimsonite1 said:
You need to watch their Bowl games. That offenseless Florida and LSU looked pretty good away from SEC defenses - Kinda like Washington. LMAO!RoadDawg55 said:
Have you ever watched Florida Boobie? What about LSU? Who is fun to watch in the SEC?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Colorado 10, Stanford 5RoadDawg55 said:SEC arguments are dumb because they have the most talent. They put the most players in the NFL and have the best program in football.
That said, their style of football is shit. I love this UW team so much because they do it all and actually shut down legitimate passing attacks. It's a much more entertaining brand of football.
I enjoy watching USC, Stanford, and Oregon (before this year). Oregon State will be fun to watch too. The PAC 12 has the best variety of teams and styles.
All of our defensive stats would be better in the SEC. It's amazing how bad most of the offenses in that conference are.
You simply can't win.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxV4w83ZI-Y