Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
25th amendment
Options
Comments
-
2001400ex said:
Did you watch the video? "Not even a smidge ofGrundleStiltzkin said:
Other than being the Chief Executive?2001400ex said:
Link for evidence or even a compelling argument, that Obama was complicit.RaceBannon said:
See? No interest whatsoever. Completely partisan2001400ex said:
More fake news. If Obama actually did that I'd call him out for it.RaceBannon said:
Did you laugh when Obama used the IRS against his political opponents or stand by silent2001400ex said:
I'm game for a Trump presidency. I just laff at those who bashed Obama calling him a communist and a president who trashed the constitution. But yet support Trump who is actually calling for communist shit and verbally trashing the constitution.greenblood said:
For your sake, let's hope not, because Trump at least shares some policies with you. You won't like Pence at all, lol2001400ex said:
Isn't the definition of Alzheimer's the loss of short term memory?greenblood said:This probably gets triggered in cases of illness or Alzheimer's. Pretty hard to use it on Trump as is. If so Obama would have been a great candidate.
http://www.snopes.com/trump-taxes-smart/
That was an article of impeachment against Nixon
None of you said a word. Which is why I laugh at your bullshit arguements
Fuck off
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWQ6UiEnDj0corruption." competence. -
I laughed at the title. "With reservations...", what the fuck does that even mean? That the decision was really hard?dhdawg said:the IRS also targeted liberal groups in that "scandal" btw.
With that said, anyone that signs this
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/12/with-reservations-obama-signs-act-to-allow-detention-of-citizens/
or fucking expands Bush's NSA wire tapping (after running against it) doesn't care about the constitution
No way ABC News was gurgling Obama's balls with that line. -
Well that decides it then.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Other than being the Chief Executive?2001400ex said:
Link for evidence or even a compelling argument, that Obama was complicit.RaceBannon said:
See? No interest whatsoever. Completely partisan2001400ex said:
More fake news. If Obama actually did that I'd call him out for it.RaceBannon said:
Did you laugh when Obama used the IRS against his political opponents or stand by silent2001400ex said:
I'm game for a Trump presidency. I just laff at those who bashed Obama calling him a communist and a president who trashed the constitution. But yet support Trump who is actually calling for communist shit and verbally trashing the constitution.greenblood said:
For your sake, let's hope not, because Trump at least shares some policies with you. You won't like Pence at all, lol2001400ex said:
Isn't the definition of Alzheimer's the loss of short term memory?greenblood said:This probably gets triggered in cases of illness or Alzheimer's. Pretty hard to use it on Trump as is. If so Obama would have been a great candidate.
http://www.snopes.com/trump-taxes-smart/
That was an article of impeachment against Nixon
None of you said a word. Which is why I laugh at your bullshit arguements
Fuck offhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWQ6UiEnDj0 -
Don't diminish your guy with lowered expectations.BennyBeaver said:
Well that decides it then.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Other than being the Chief Executive?2001400ex said:
Link for evidence or even a compelling argument, that Obama was complicit.RaceBannon said:
See? No interest whatsoever. Completely partisan2001400ex said:
More fake news. If Obama actually did that I'd call him out for it.RaceBannon said:
Did you laugh when Obama used the IRS against his political opponents or stand by silent2001400ex said:
I'm game for a Trump presidency. I just laff at those who bashed Obama calling him a communist and a president who trashed the constitution. But yet support Trump who is actually calling for communist shit and verbally trashing the constitution.greenblood said:
For your sake, let's hope not, because Trump at least shares some policies with you. You won't like Pence at all, lol2001400ex said:
Isn't the definition of Alzheimer's the loss of short term memory?greenblood said:This probably gets triggered in cases of illness or Alzheimer's. Pretty hard to use it on Trump as is. If so Obama would have been a great candidate.
http://www.snopes.com/trump-taxes-smart/
That was an article of impeachment against Nixon
None of you said a word. Which is why I laugh at your bullshit arguements
Fuck offhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWQ6UiEnDj0 -
Liberal groups were targeted was the everybody does it spin for cover that the gullible are apparently still swallowing
-
I mean that interview, with Bill O'Reilly, proves everything. Impeach Obama!GrundleStiltzkin said:
Don't diminish your guy with lowered expectations.BennyBeaver said:
Well that decides it then.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Other than being the Chief Executive?2001400ex said:
Link for evidence or even a compelling argument, that Obama was complicit.RaceBannon said:
See? No interest whatsoever. Completely partisan2001400ex said:
More fake news. If Obama actually did that I'd call him out for it.RaceBannon said:
Did you laugh when Obama used the IRS against his political opponents or stand by silent2001400ex said:
I'm game for a Trump presidency. I just laff at those who bashed Obama calling him a communist and a president who trashed the constitution. But yet support Trump who is actually calling for communist shit and verbally trashing the constitution.greenblood said:
For your sake, let's hope not, because Trump at least shares some policies with you. You won't like Pence at all, lol2001400ex said:
Isn't the definition of Alzheimer's the loss of short term memory?greenblood said:This probably gets triggered in cases of illness or Alzheimer's. Pretty hard to use it on Trump as is. If so Obama would have been a great candidate.
http://www.snopes.com/trump-taxes-smart/
That was an article of impeachment against Nixon
None of you said a word. Which is why I laugh at your bullshit arguements
Fuck offhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWQ6UiEnDj0 -
The IRS shouldn't go after tax fraud! C'mon people, get your shit together!
-
Cry pardon. That was a dot for Honda and his fat crayon to connect.BennyBeaver said:
I mean that interview, with Bill O'Reilly, proves everything. Impeach Obama!GrundleStiltzkin said:
Don't diminish your guy with lowered expectations.BennyBeaver said:
Well that decides it then.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Other than being the Chief Executive?2001400ex said:
Link for evidence or even a compelling argument, that Obama was complicit.RaceBannon said:
See? No interest whatsoever. Completely partisan2001400ex said:
More fake news. If Obama actually did that I'd call him out for it.RaceBannon said:
Did you laugh when Obama used the IRS against his political opponents or stand by silent2001400ex said:
I'm game for a Trump presidency. I just laff at those who bashed Obama calling him a communist and a president who trashed the constitution. But yet support Trump who is actually calling for communist shit and verbally trashing the constitution.greenblood said:
For your sake, let's hope not, because Trump at least shares some policies with you. You won't like Pence at all, lol2001400ex said:
Isn't the definition of Alzheimer's the loss of short term memory?greenblood said:This probably gets triggered in cases of illness or Alzheimer's. Pretty hard to use it on Trump as is. If so Obama would have been a great candidate.
http://www.snopes.com/trump-taxes-smart/
That was an article of impeachment against Nixon
None of you said a word. Which is why I laugh at your bullshit arguements
Fuck offhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWQ6UiEnDj0 -
This was the other spinBennyBeaver said:The IRS shouldn't go after tax fraud! C'mon people, get your shit together!
To recap
The folks here screaming about Trump trashing the constitution want to go after the 2nd amendment and don't give a shit that Obama used the IRS to go after his enemies just like Nixon -
There were many hearings under a conservative Congress. Why were there no convictions? Let alone even filed charges?RaceBannon said:
This was the other spinBennyBeaver said:The IRS shouldn't go after tax fraud! C'mon people, get your shit together!
To recap
The folks here screaming about Trump trashing the constitution want to go after the 2nd amendment and don't give a shit that Obama used the IRS to go after his enemies just like Nixon
You are a lover of fake news tho. You eat that shit up. -
HYG.2001400ex said:
There were many hearings under a conservative Congress. Why were there no convictions? Let alone even filed charges?RaceBannon said:
This was the other spinBennyBeaver said:The IRS shouldn't go after tax fraud! C'mon people, get your shit together!
To recap
The folks here screaming about Trump trashing the constitution want to go after the 2nd amendment and don't give a shit that Obama used the IRS to go after his enemies just like Nixon
You are a lover of fake news tho. You eat that shit up.If Americans know anything about the IRS it’s that it accepts no excuses, and so they trudged wearily on Wednesday to pay their taxes. That’s in notable contrast to the free passes that keep flowing to the tax agency’s most famous former employee, Lois Lerner.
The Obama Administration’s latest gift to the former IRS tax-exempt chief came recently when U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Ron Machen informed the House of Representatives that he would not file charges on its formal contempt citation against Ms. Lerner. This absolution, which shields Ms. Lerner from a grand jury probe, came on Mr. Machen’s final day on the job.
To review: Ms. Lerner was summoned to the House on May 22, 2013, to answer questions about her role in the IRS’s politically biased review of Tea Party nonprofit group applications for tax-exempt status.
She began her testimony with a statement recounting her career, reprising the scandal and proclaiming her innocence. She ended by saying: “I have not done anything wrong. I have not broken any laws, I have not violated any IRS rules or regulations, and I have not provided false information to this or any other congressional committee.” Only after she offered this long defense did she claim her right not to incriminate herself by citing the Fifth Amendment, refusing to answer questions.
House lawyers determined that, in making that statement, Ms. Lerner had forfeited her right to remain silent. The House on May 7, 2014 held her in contempt of Congress and sent the citation to Mr. Machen.
The law clearly explains that the U.S. Attorney’s only “duty” “shall be” to “bring the matter before the grand jury for its action.” Mr. Machen instead sat on the contempt citation for 11 months, and on March 31 sent Speaker John Boehner a letter explaining he’d unilaterally decided not to investigate Ms. Lerner. -
Nacho is a thin-skinned idiot, born with a silver spoon and is an embarrassment to the American people (even the deplorables that voted for him). Uses twitter like a spoiled baby brat. If you think he has anything but his own self-interest at heart, you're wrong. If I'm disproved by his actions, I'll eat my plate of crow. If he lives up to his shitty words, we're fucked. Now that he's President elect, he needs to learn that he can tone down the rhetoric and bullshit pandering to the fragile flower white males, he'll still get the attention his attention whoring soul needs.RaceBannon said:
This was the other spinBennyBeaver said:The IRS shouldn't go after tax fraud! C'mon people, get your shit together!
To recap
The folks here screaming about Trump trashing the constitution want to go after the 2nd amendment and don't give a shit that Obama used the IRS to go after his enemies just like Nixon
The only thing the Nacho has going for him is his hot-as-balls wife and daughter.
The IRS investigates tax fraud during Obama's Presidency. Big fucking deal.
-
So you agree no charges were filed.GrundleStiltzkin said:
HYG.2001400ex said:
There were many hearings under a conservative Congress. Why were there no convictions? Let alone even filed charges?RaceBannon said:
This was the other spinBennyBeaver said:The IRS shouldn't go after tax fraud! C'mon people, get your shit together!
To recap
The folks here screaming about Trump trashing the constitution want to go after the 2nd amendment and don't give a shit that Obama used the IRS to go after his enemies just like Nixon
You are a lover of fake news tho. You eat that shit up.If Americans know anything about the IRS it’s that it accepts no excuses, and so they trudged wearily on Wednesday to pay their taxes. That’s in notable contrast to the free passes that keep flowing to the tax agency’s most famous former employee, Lois Lerner.
The Obama Administration’s latest gift to the former IRS tax-exempt chief came recently when U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Ron Machen informed the House of Representatives that he would not file charges on its formal contempt citation against Ms. Lerner. This absolution, which shields Ms. Lerner from a grand jury probe, came on Mr. Machen’s final day on the job.
To review: Ms. Lerner was summoned to the House on May 22, 2013, to answer questions about her role in the IRS’s politically biased review of Tea Party nonprofit group applications for tax-exempt status.
She began her testimony with a statement recounting her career, reprising the scandal and proclaiming her innocence. She ended by saying: “I have not done anything wrong. I have not broken any laws, I have not violated any IRS rules or regulations, and I have not provided false information to this or any other congressional committee.” Only after she offered this long defense did she claim her right not to incriminate herself by citing the Fifth Amendment, refusing to answer questions.
House lawyers determined that, in making that statement, Ms. Lerner had forfeited her right to remain silent. The House on May 7, 2014 held her in contempt of Congress and sent the citation to Mr. Machen.
The law clearly explains that the U.S. Attorney’s only “duty” “shall be” to “bring the matter before the grand jury for its action.” Mr. Machen instead sat on the contempt citation for 11 months, and on March 31 sent Speaker John Boehner a letter explaining he’d unilaterally decided not to investigate Ms. Lerner. -
So you agree no charges were filed.2001400ex said:GrundleStiltzkin said:
HYG.2001400ex said:
There were many hearings under a conservative Congress. Why were there no convictions? Let alone even filed charges?RaceBannon said:
This was the other spinBennyBeaver said:The IRS shouldn't go after tax fraud! C'mon people, get your shit together!
To recap
The folks here screaming about Trump trashing the constitution want to go after the 2nd amendment and don't give a shit that Obama used the IRS to go after his enemies just like Nixon
You are a lover of fake news tho. You eat that shit up.If Americans know anything about the IRS it’s that it accepts no excuses, and so they trudged wearily on Wednesday to pay their taxes. That’s in notable contrast to the free passes that keep flowing to the tax agency’s most famous former employee, Lois Lerner.
The Obama Administration’s latest gift to the former IRS tax-exempt chief came recently when U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Ron Machen informed the House of Representatives that he would not file charges on its formal contempt citation against Ms. Lerner. This absolution, which shields Ms. Lerner from a grand jury probe, came on Mr. Machen’s final day on the job.
To review: Ms. Lerner was summoned to the House on May 22, 2013, to answer questions about her role in the IRS’s politically biased review of Tea Party nonprofit group applications for tax-exempt status.
She began her testimony with a statement recounting her career, reprising the scandal and proclaiming her innocence. She ended by saying: “I have not done anything wrong. I have not broken any laws, I have not violated any IRS rules or regulations, and I have not provided false information to this or any other congressional committee.” Only after she offered this long defense did she claim her right not to incriminate herself by citing the Fifth Amendment, refusing to answer questions.
House lawyers determined that, in making that statement, Ms. Lerner had forfeited her right to remain silent. The House on May 7, 2014 held her in contempt of Congress and sent the citation to Mr. Machen.
The law clearly explains that the U.S. Attorney’s only “duty” “shall be” to “bring the matter before the grand jury for its action.” Mr. Machen instead sat on the contempt citation for 11 months, and on March 31 sent Speaker John Boehner a letter explaining he’d unilaterally decided not to investigate Ms. Lerner.
Precisely. Score one for your guy.
-
Give Trump time to get his own communists in there.2001400ex said:
I'm game for a Trump presidency. I just laff at those who bashed Obama calling him a communist and a president who trashed the constitution. But yet support Trump who is actually calling for communist shit and verbally trashing the constitution.greenblood said:
For your sake, let's hope not, because Trump at least shares some policies with you. You won't like Pence at all, lol2001400ex said:
Isn't the definition of Alzheimer's the loss of short term memory?greenblood said:This probably gets triggered in cases of illness or Alzheimer's. Pretty hard to use it on Trump as is. If so Obama would have been a great candidate.
http://www.snopes.com/trump-taxes-smart/
-
OBAMA has at least 6 different tells that He's lying here.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Other than being the Chief Executive?2001400ex said:
Link for evidence or even a compelling argument, that Obama was complicit.RaceBannon said:
See? No interest whatsoever. Completely partisan2001400ex said:
More fake news. If Obama actually did that I'd call him out for it.RaceBannon said:
Did you laugh when Obama used the IRS against his political opponents or stand by silent2001400ex said:
I'm game for a Trump presidency. I just laff at those who bashed Obama calling him a communist and a president who trashed the constitution. But yet support Trump who is actually calling for communist shit and verbally trashing the constitution.greenblood said:
For your sake, let's hope not, because Trump at least shares some policies with you. You won't like Pence at all, lol2001400ex said:
Isn't the definition of Alzheimer's the loss of short term memory?greenblood said:This probably gets triggered in cases of illness or Alzheimer's. Pretty hard to use it on Trump as is. If so Obama would have been a great candidate.
http://www.snopes.com/trump-taxes-smart/
That was an article of impeachment against Nixon
None of you said a word. Which is why I laugh at your bullshit arguements
Fuck offhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWQ6UiEnDj0
Hondo PWND daily. -
You sound bitter.....BennyBeaver said:
Nacho is a thin-skinned idiot, born with a silver spoon and is an embarrassment to the American people (even the deplorables that voted for him). Uses twitter like a spoiled baby brat. If you think he has anything but his own self-interest at heart, you're wrong. If I'm disproved by his actions, I'll eat my plate of crow. If he lives up to his shitty words, we're fucked. Now that he's President elect, he needs to learn that he can tone down the rhetoric and bullshit pandering to the fragile flower white males, he'll still get the attention his attention whoring soul needs.RaceBannon said:
This was the other spinBennyBeaver said:The IRS shouldn't go after tax fraud! C'mon people, get your shit together!
To recap
The folks here screaming about Trump trashing the constitution want to go after the 2nd amendment and don't give a shit that Obama used the IRS to go after his enemies just like Nixon
The only thing the Nacho has going for him is his hot-as-balls wife and daughter.
The IRS investigates tax fraud during Obama's Presidency. Big fucking deal.
and poor. -
