Losers lose
Comments
-
This is pathetic even for liberals
-
Becoming obvious Dems are going to try this or hondo wouldn't be so happy
-
There won't be a recount. It would look pretty embarrassing to recount an election after the loser concedes and the winner is in middle of White House hires.doogie said:Becoming obvious Dems are going to try this or hondo wouldn't be so happy
-
Gore couldn't overcome 700 votes ...
Clinton is going to overcome 10,000+ votes in three states ... the whole while being sued and re-sued by the world's foremost expert on suing? -
I think this is dumb. Hence the title. But keep up the bullshit.doogie said:Becoming obvious Dems are going to try this or hondo wouldn't be so happy
-
Let it go. Bronco had eight years to do something and literally accomplished nothing. The one thing he did do turned out to be a giant turd.
The all-time highs of the market indexes had nothing to do with him. It was the indexes themselves restructuring to ride on the bigger companies which is why one bad earnings report from a major company puts the entire market down for the day now.
Trump is going to be absolutely horrible while he is in office. There is no wiggle room on that. The man/woman after him will determine if what he did on behalf of Wal-Mart people was a good thing. -
What's ironic is Hondo posting a title "Losers Loose".
-
bump2001400ex said:
I think this is dumb. Hence the title. But keep up the bullshit.doogie said:Becoming obvious Dems are going to try this or hondo wouldn't be so happy
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-25/its-official-jill-stein-files-petition-wisconsin-recount
-
She filed a petition, it doesnt mean they are recounting. They will now research the cost. Given it's over 2 million votes, you're probably looking at a cost of $3-$4 million dollars.doogie said:
bump2001400ex said:
I think this is dumb. Hence the title. But keep up the bullshit.doogie said:Becoming obvious Dems are going to try this or hondo wouldn't be so happy
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-25/its-official-jill-stein-files-petition-wisconsin-recount
I love how the site mentions how little a 22,000 vote lead is. A recount isn't going to change the winner. I think they want to look for possible hacking of the voting software, but a recount won't do that. So like a typical liberal, she wants to take $3-$4 million dollars and set it on fire...bravo. -
You sound scared.greenblood said:
She filed a petition, it doesnt mean they are recounting. They will now research the cost. Given it's over 2 million votes, you're probably looking at a cost of $3-$4 million dollars.doogie said:
bump2001400ex said:
I think this is dumb. Hence the title. But keep up the bullshit.doogie said:Becoming obvious Dems are going to try this or hondo wouldn't be so happy
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-25/its-official-jill-stein-files-petition-wisconsin-recount
I love how the site mentions how little a 22,000 vote lead is. A recount isn't going to change the winner. I think they want to look for possible hacking of the voting software, but a recount won't do that. So like a typical liberal, she wants to take $3-$4 million dollars and set it on fire...bravo. -
"A vote for Hillary is a vote for Nuclear War!!!" Stein has raised over $5mm to help sweep Hillary into office
-
You sound defeated2001400ex said:
You sound scared.greenblood said:
She filed a petition, it doesnt mean they are recounting. They will now research the cost. Given it's over 2 million votes, you're probably looking at a cost of $3-$4 million dollars.doogie said:
bump2001400ex said:
I think this is dumb. Hence the title. But keep up the bullshit.doogie said:Becoming obvious Dems are going to try this or hondo wouldn't be so happy
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-25/its-official-jill-stein-files-petition-wisconsin-recount
I love how the site mentions how little a 22,000 vote lead is. A recount isn't going to change the winner. I think they want to look for possible hacking of the voting software, but a recount won't do that. So like a typical liberal, she wants to take $3-$4 million dollars and set it on fire...bravo. -
Jill is doing a wonderful job of finding out who the idiot marks are who have money to burn.
-
No. This will be a fun four years and I get a tax cut. Thanks Trump!!greenblood said:
You sound defeated2001400ex said:
You sound scared.greenblood said:
She filed a petition, it doesnt mean they are recounting. They will now research the cost. Given it's over 2 million votes, you're probably looking at a cost of $3-$4 million dollars.doogie said:
bump2001400ex said:
I think this is dumb. Hence the title. But keep up the bullshit.doogie said:Becoming obvious Dems are going to try this or hondo wouldn't be so happy
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-25/its-official-jill-stein-files-petition-wisconsin-recount
I love how the site mentions how little a 22,000 vote lead is. A recount isn't going to change the winner. I think they want to look for possible hacking of the voting software, but a recount won't do that. So like a typical liberal, she wants to take $3-$4 million dollars and set it on fire...bravo. -
Should I spike the football now?
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-11-26/clinton-campaign-will-participate-in-stein-s-state-recounts -
The problem here is, the millenials 'protesting' have been disrupting traffic.
If overturned, the red states are well-armed, rested and ready.
-
I thought only trailer park trash was happy...2001400ex said:
No. This will be a fun four years and I get a tax cut. Thanks Trump!!greenblood said:
You sound defeated2001400ex said:
You sound scared.greenblood said:
She filed a petition, it doesnt mean they are recounting. They will now research the cost. Given it's over 2 million votes, you're probably looking at a cost of $3-$4 million dollars.doogie said:
bump2001400ex said:
I think this is dumb. Hence the title. But keep up the bullshit.doogie said:Becoming obvious Dems are going to try this or hondo wouldn't be so happy
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-25/its-official-jill-stein-files-petition-wisconsin-recount
I love how the site mentions how little a 22,000 vote lead is. A recount isn't going to change the winner. I think they want to look for possible hacking of the voting software, but a recount won't do that. So like a typical liberal, she wants to take $3-$4 million dollars and set it on fire...bravo. -
Hondo's hero is down with the count!
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/11/26/clinton-team-joins-steins-three-state-vote-recount-that-begins-in-wisconsin.html -
We are also at our recession time limit as well. The market indexes are at all time highs along with the value of the dollar.2001400ex said:
No. This will be a fun four years and I get a tax cut. Thanks Trump!!greenblood said:
You sound defeated2001400ex said:
You sound scared.greenblood said:
She filed a petition, it doesnt mean they are recounting. They will now research the cost. Given it's over 2 million votes, you're probably looking at a cost of $3-$4 million dollars.doogie said:
bump2001400ex said:
I think this is dumb. Hence the title. But keep up the bullshit.doogie said:Becoming obvious Dems are going to try this or hondo wouldn't be so happy
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-25/its-official-jill-stein-files-petition-wisconsin-recount
I love how the site mentions how little a 22,000 vote lead is. A recount isn't going to change the winner. I think they want to look for possible hacking of the voting software, but a recount won't do that. So like a typical liberal, she wants to take $3-$4 million dollars and set it on fire...bravo.
I'm fully leveraged for economic failure now, just waiting for the shoe to drop in the next nine months. Which it will. -
your nickname doesn't happen to be hobbit does it?Mosster47 said:
We are also at our recession time limit as well. The market indexes are at all time highs along with the value of the dollar.2001400ex said:
No. This will be a fun four years and I get a tax cut. Thanks Trump!!greenblood said:
You sound defeated2001400ex said:
You sound scared.greenblood said:
She filed a petition, it doesnt mean they are recounting. They will now research the cost. Given it's over 2 million votes, you're probably looking at a cost of $3-$4 million dollars.doogie said:
bump2001400ex said:
I think this is dumb. Hence the title. But keep up the bullshit.doogie said:Becoming obvious Dems are going to try this or hondo wouldn't be so happy
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-25/its-official-jill-stein-files-petition-wisconsin-recount
I love how the site mentions how little a 22,000 vote lead is. A recount isn't going to change the winner. I think they want to look for possible hacking of the voting software, but a recount won't do that. So like a typical liberal, she wants to take $3-$4 million dollars and set it on fire...bravo.
I'm fully leveraged for economic failure now, just waiting for the shoe to drop in the next nine months. Which it will.