Seriously, how can you not LIFPO?

Auburndawg

Admit it you bitter HHBs, how many of you thought we would beat Boise, or start 4-0, or lose by 3 to Stanford on the road?

This team hasn't surprised you? BS.

Yes, given the occassional sloppiness this team could still end up 7-6 and you will all be proven right. And I will agree with you and become 100% anti-Sark.

But after we what we have seen so far you seriously don't think we can win 10 or more games?

Saying that Sark is absolutely going to fail is as foolish as saying last night proved we have arrived. Absolutely nothing has been proven yet.

Dawgtona

Disagree. We have four seasons of mediocrity and poor in game decisions as proof.

Seven has a ceiling and we know what it is.

chrisvashon

14.5 point underdogs to Oregon. At home.

Which means after Saturday we will be out of the Pac-12 race.

Happy to lipo, but not sure why you're so excited about it.

jecornel

I have to say aub, this was not your best effort. I would work on a rewrite.

RaceBannon

If sark hadn't blown last night's game I might agree with you. Yes the team is better than I thought. No Sark isn't

creepycoug

Auburndawg said:

Admit it you bitter HHBs, how many of you thought we would beat Boise, or start 4-0, or lose by 3 to Stanford on the road?

This team hasn't surprised you? BS.

Yes, given the occassional sloppiness this team could still end up 7-6 and you will all be proven right. And I will agree with you and become 100% anti-Sark.

But after we what we have seen so far you seriously don't think we can win 10 or more games?

Saying that Sark is absolutely going to fail is as foolish as saying last night proved we have arrived. Absolutely nothing has been proven yet.

Iron laws. Maybe you're right. Coaching doesn't matter.

[Deleted User]

Auburn I said going into the year this team would go 7-6. I also said this team would start off 4-0.

UW is doing what they are supposed to do. Also I don't give a fuck about moral victories.

You know who liked moral victories? Fans of Tyrone Willingham. Remember he used to play good to even great teams tough. Even went toe to toe with Carroll two years in a row.

Fire_Marshall_Bill

On Friday I would have given this team about a 15 percent chance of winning 10. Now I'd raise that to 40 or 45. Ten still equals six and three though. Sark doesn't win the PAC 12 unless it drops to 1999 depths (when Ty won it). That's the problem. Duuude braahhh what happened to ur special teams? Not cool man, not cool.

MikeDamone

I'm not surprised they started 4-0. I'm surprised they played Stanford close. I'm not surprised they lost because sark is a retard. I won't be surprised if they go 10-2. I won't be surprised if the go 7-6.

IrishDawg22

RaceBannon said:

If sark hadn't blown last night's game I might agree with you. Yes the team is better than I thought. No Sark isn't

Agreed.

Unlike others I loved the Stanford match up and thought if we made the game about Hogan trying to beat us we had a great chance.

If you "know" your fucking K is hurt/sucks, as a HC you better have a very good strategy when it comes to KO coverage.

He should call Keith, Bishop and the entire defense into the the meeting room and turn in his resignation tonight for fucking up their great performance.

Tailgater

Auburndawg said:

Admit it you bitter HHBs, how many of you thought we would beat Boise, or start 4-0, or lose by 3 to Stanford on the road?

This team hasn't surprised you? BS.

Yes, given the occassional sloppiness this team could still end up 7-6 and you will all be proven right. And I will agree with you and become 100% anti-Sark.

But after we what we have seen so far you seriously don't think we can win 10 or more games?

Saying that Sark is absolutely going to fail is as foolish as saying last night proved we have arrived. Absolutely nothing has been proven yet.

I got a better one for you. Saying Sark will succeed with what his program has presented thus far through five games in 2013 is as premature and pregnant with overblown expectation as predicting that next Spring's NFL draft will have a place in any round for ASJ.

Unless your suggesting that last night should in the Oregon Way be counted as some kind of moral victory, I've seen nothing yet in 2013 that can forecast victory over Oregon, @ ASU, or @UCLA, and the trip down to Oregon State even though the Beavs lost to mighty EWU must be considered a toss-up.

Until Sark can prove he's capable of beating a good, well-coached opponent on the road, the Huskies simply won't beat upper echelon teams away from Husky Stadium nor the elites anywhere.
Last night was another example of how poor to mediocre preparation in essential areas can throw away an otherwise excellent if not inspiring Husky performance.

I don't recall ever watching during my long lifetime an opponent blow through Husky defenders for three(3) long kick of return ns which led directly to 21 of Stanford's 31 points. WTF kind of coaching is that? Good well coached teams, especially when travelling, will nearly always force their toughest opponents to earn every inch gained and point scored.

Good, well-coached teams also don't repeatedly stop themselves by playing flag football in first halves on the road as the 2013 Huskies have done now in both their road games. Can you imagine hoe good Sark's team might be if they could avoid penalties and defend against long kick-off and punt returns.