Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Question for the people who had written off Petersen...

13

Comments

  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,598 Founders Club

    '14 was a scratch. How the fuck do you win with Cyler Miles or Jeff Lindquist at QB? Last year was immature and difficult, mostly because of Smiff's unnecessarily complicated play-calling with a true frosh QB and lazy fucking receivers with stone hands. Firing Pease was the right move. Sark would've kept him another year. Ty? Wouldn't have noticed anything wrong.

    Pete was the right hire from day one. His recruiting alone, after mediocre seasons 1 & 2, is fucking amazing by any measure. Anyone who ever accused him of being the "same old shit" as Sark or Ty is a blind fucking idiot who needs an open mouth swirly in an overflowing Honey Bucket, before being torched on the W.

    And now we're praising Smiff when Tedford has him on his knee with his hand in his back. Incredible.

    Fucking this. Stupid pills must be all the rage around here. Smiff only looks decent because Tedford stands over him at practice with a tenderizing mallet and hits him in the tenders whenever he does dumb shit stuff. Christ.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,990 Standard Supporter
    Swaye said:

    '14 was a scratch. How the fuck do you win with Cyler Miles or Jeff Lindquist at QB? Last year was immature and difficult, mostly because of Smiff's unnecessarily complicated play-calling with a true frosh QB and lazy fucking receivers with stone hands. Firing Pease was the right move. Sark would've kept him another year. Ty? Wouldn't have noticed anything wrong.

    Pete was the right hire from day one. His recruiting alone, after mediocre seasons 1 & 2, is fucking amazing by any measure. Anyone who ever accused him of being the "same old shit" as Sark or Ty is a blind fucking idiot who needs an open mouth swirly in an overflowing Honey Bucket, before being torched on the W.

    And now we're praising Smiff when Tedford has him on his knee with his hand in his back. Incredible.

    Fucking this. Stupid pills must be all the rage around here. Smiff only looks decent because Tedford stands over him at practice with a tenderizing mallet and hits him in the tenders whenever he does dumb shit stuff. Christ.
    In a game where the O scores 70 points, Smiff continues to distinguish himself with bad calls that stick out like a sore thumb. The worst thing about trick plays and misdirection plays is the confidence they provide to opposing defenses when they fail or result in a only a yard or two. They work best when completely unexpected, but everyone expects them from Smiff. Save that shit for when it's needed. The last thing this program needs is a self-sabateur monkey-wrenching a decent offense. This will hurt us in a tight game against better teams. Tedford should just hurl him through the skybox glass already.
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsiCokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646

    '14 was a scratch. How the fuck do you win with Cyler Miles or Jeff Lindquist at QB? Last year was immature and difficult, mostly because of Smiff's unnecessarily complicated play-calling with a true frosh QB and lazy fucking receivers with stone hands. Firing Pease was the right move. Sark would've kept him another year. Ty? Wouldn't have noticed anything wrong.

    Pete was the right hire from day one. His recruiting alone, after mediocre seasons 1 & 2, is fucking amazing by any measure. Anyone who ever accused him of being the "same old shit" as Sark or Ty is a blind fucking idiot who needs an open mouth swirly in an overflowing Honey Bucket, before being torched on the W.

    And now we're praising Smiff when Tedford has him on his knee with his hand in his back. Incredible.

    Fuck off.

    Pete had a worse W-L record than Sark. And his whole "built for life" mantra was no better than Ty's "molder of men" as long as they were losing.

    Make whatever fucking excuses you want about the QB (doog) or recruiting (NAMBLA doog), but that's the truth.

    Claiming you "knew all along" that Pete was the guy is bullshit, as there were no facts to support such a position. Your blind faith was wrong for 15 years.

    HTH
    This

    We all dooged over the hire but then his first year he fucks up Stanford and blows the Arizona game to put us in CHARTED waters of loserdom once again. Then we sucked again last year.

    If you didn't doubt Petersen coming into this year you wanted Ty to have 5 years
    I didn't want Ty to have 5 years.
  • AIRWOLFAIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840
    Lots of gold in this thread.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    '14 was a scratch. How the fuck do you win with Cyler Miles or Jeff Lindquist at QB? Last year was immature and difficult, mostly because of Smiff's unnecessarily complicated play-calling with a true frosh QB and lazy fucking receivers with stone hands. Firing Pease was the right move. Sark would've kept him another year. Ty? Wouldn't have noticed anything wrong.

    Pete was the right hire from day one. His recruiting alone, after mediocre seasons 1 & 2, is fucking amazing by any measure. Anyone who ever accused him of being the "same old shit" as Sark or Ty is a blind fucking idiot who needs an open mouth swirly in an overflowing Honey Bucket, before being torched on the W.

    And now we're praising Smiff when Tedford has him on his knee with his hand in his back. Incredible.

    Fuck off.

    Pete had a worse W-L record than Sark. And his whole "built for life" mantra was no better than Ty's "molder of men" as long as they were losing.

    Make whatever fucking excuses you want about the QB (doog) or recruiting (NAMBLA doog), but that's the truth.

    Claiming you "knew all along" that Pete was the guy is bullshit, as there were no facts to support such a position. Your blind faith was wrong for 15 years.

    HTH
    This

    We all dooged over the hire but then his first year he fucks up Stanford and blows the Arizona game to put us in CHARTED waters of loserdom once again. Then we sucked again last year.

    If you didn't doubt Petersen coming into this year you wanted Ty to have 5 years
    I didn't want Ty to have 5 years.
    Disagree.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,990 Standard Supporter
    @Tommy, @Race. I played the game. I seriously doubt either of you did.

    I weathered all your bullshit last year on that "Fire Pete, Hire Chip" thread, and said then Pete was the right hire at the right time. So, go read the thread, dredge up your Bama avatars, start writing "winners win" every other post, and suck each other off to your hearts' content.

    @Tommy, you have no football acumen. Stick to slamming Romar.

    At least Race is funny, but then he says really stupid stuff like "you wanted Ty for 5 years" or "Nobody prays to lose." (Profound). Sure, Race. I watched the 0-12 from my Tyee seats and couldn't wait for another year.

    You two shit-talkers are defensive as fuck because you talked endless streams of smack and can't pull it back. Now Pete needs to lose a big game for either of you to maintain a shred of credibility.

    You made your beds, enjoy them. It's called comeuppance.
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsiCokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646

    '14 was a scratch. How the fuck do you win with Cyler Miles or Jeff Lindquist at QB? Last year was immature and difficult, mostly because of Smiff's unnecessarily complicated play-calling with a true frosh QB and lazy fucking receivers with stone hands. Firing Pease was the right move. Sark would've kept him another year. Ty? Wouldn't have noticed anything wrong.

    Pete was the right hire from day one. His recruiting alone, after mediocre seasons 1 & 2, is fucking amazing by any measure. Anyone who ever accused him of being the "same old shit" as Sark or Ty is a blind fucking idiot who needs an open mouth swirly in an overflowing Honey Bucket, before being torched on the W.

    And now we're praising Smiff when Tedford has him on his knee with his hand in his back. Incredible.

    Fuck off.

    Pete had a worse W-L record than Sark. And his whole "built for life" mantra was no better than Ty's "molder of men" as long as they were losing.

    Make whatever fucking excuses you want about the QB (doog) or recruiting (NAMBLA doog), but that's the truth.

    Claiming you "knew all along" that Pete was the guy is bullshit, as there were no facts to support such a position. Your blind faith was wrong for 15 years.

    HTH
    This

    We all dooged over the hire but then his first year he fucks up Stanford and blows the Arizona game to put us in CHARTED waters of loserdom once again. Then we sucked again last year.

    If you didn't doubt Petersen coming into this year you wanted Ty to have 5 years
    I didn't want Ty to have 5 years.
    Disagree.
    OK!
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    @Tommy, @Race. I played the game. I seriously doubt either of you did.

    I weathered all your bullshit last year on that "Fire Pete, Hire Chip" thread, and said then Pete was the right hire at the right time. So, go read the thread, dredge up your Bama avatars, start writing "winners win" every other post, and suck each other off to your hearts' content.

    @Tommy, you have no football acumen. Stick to slamming Romar.

    At least Race is funny, but then he says really stupid stuff like "you wanted Ty for 5 years" or "Nobody prays to lose." (Profound). Sure, Race. I watched the 0-12 from my Tyee seats and couldn't wait for another year.

    You two shit-talkers are defensive as fuck because you talked endless streams of smack and can't pull it back. Now Pete needs to lose a big game for either of you to maintain a shred of credibility.

    You made your beds, enjoy them. It's called comeuppance.

    Doogman might be a better site for you.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,990 Standard Supporter

    @Tommy, @Race. I played the game. I seriously doubt either of you did.

    I weathered all your bullshit last year on that "Fire Pete, Hire Chip" thread, and said then Pete was the right hire at the right time. So, go read the thread, dredge up your Bama avatars, start writing "winners win" every other post, and suck each other off to your hearts' content.

    @Tommy, you have no football acumen. Stick to slamming Romar.

    At least Race is funny, but then he says really stupid stuff like "you wanted Ty for 5 years" or "Nobody prays to lose." (Profound). Sure, Race. I watched the 0-12 from my Tyee seats and couldn't wait for another year.

    You two shit-talkers are defensive as fuck because you talked endless streams of smack and can't pull it back. Now Pete needs to lose a big game for either of you to maintain a shred of credibility.

    You made your beds, enjoy them. It's called comeuppance.

    Doogman might be a better site for you.
    Hey Boobs: Who was the best team in the Pac10 in 1984 if not UW, as you proudly claimed? You never answered the question. Did you forget?

    But still...
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    @Tommy, @Race. I played the game. I seriously doubt either of you did.

    I weathered all your bullshit last year on that "Fire Pete, Hire Chip" thread, and said then Pete was the right hire at the right time. So, go read the thread, dredge up your Bama avatars, start writing "winners win" every other post, and suck each other off to your hearts' content.

    @Tommy, you have no football acumen. Stick to slamming Romar.

    At least Race is funny, but then he says really stupid stuff like "you wanted Ty for 5 years" or "Nobody prays to lose." (Profound). Sure, Race. I watched the 0-12 from my Tyee seats and couldn't wait for another year.

    You two shit-talkers are defensive as fuck because you talked endless streams of smack and can't pull it back. Now Pete needs to lose a big game for either of you to maintain a shred of credibility.

    You made your beds, enjoy them. It's called comeuppance.

    Doogman might be a better site for you.
    Hey Boobs: Who was the best team in the Pac10 in 1984 if not UW, as you proudly claimed? You never answered the question. Did you forget?

    But still...
    USC was. They won the conference after all.

    http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/conferences/pac-10/1984.html



    Doogs hate facts.
  • BearsWiinBearsWiin Member Posts: 5,035

    '14 was a scratch. How the fuck do you win with Cyler Miles or Jeff Lindquist at QB? Last year was immature and difficult, mostly because of Smiff's unnecessarily complicated play-calling with a true frosh QB and lazy fucking receivers with stone hands. Firing Pease was the right move. Sark would've kept him another year. Ty? Wouldn't have noticed anything wrong.

    Pete was the right hire from day one. His recruiting alone, after mediocre seasons 1 & 2, is fucking amazing by any measure. Anyone who ever accused him of being the "same old shit" as Sark or Ty is a blind fucking idiot who needs an open mouth swirly in an overflowing Honey Bucket, before being torched on the W.

    And now we're praising Smiff when Tedford has him on his knee with his hand in his back. Incredible.

    Fuck off.

    Pete had a worse W-L record than Sark. And his whole "built for life" mantra was no better than Ty's "molder of men" as long as they were losing.

    Make whatever fucking excuses you want about the QB (doog) or recruiting (NAMBLA doog), but that's the truth.

    Claiming you "knew all along" that Pete was the guy is bullshit, as there were no facts to support such a position. Your blind faith was wrong for 15 years.

    HTH
    This

    We all dooged over the hire but then his first year he fucks up Stanford and blows the Arizona game to put us in CHARTED waters of loserdom once again. Then we sucked again last year.

    If you didn't doubt Petersen coming into this year you wanted Ty to have 5 years
    You're right, Uncle Race. I didn't doubt Petersen one fucking bit coming into this year. I also wanted Ty to have a lifetime contract with your people.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,990 Standard Supporter
    edited October 2016

    Nobody is more defensive than the Ty needed more time crew. I can still smoke out the remnants of that crowd even though they are here under witness protection.

    Grampy's mumbling gibberish again.

    Sorry. I know that's ageist.
  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072

    Nobody is more defensive than the Ty needed more time crew. I can still smoke out the remnants of that crowd even though they are here under witness protection.

    yeah well they can smoke you out too
  • DoogstoneDoogstone Member Posts: 202
    why did seemingly nice and docile posters like turdbuffer, haie and bricksquad turn evil after one of UW's most joyous wins in a long time
Sign In or Register to comment.