Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

San Diego Union Tribune hasn't endorsed a democrat for president in 148 years, until today

245

Comments

  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,232
    So let me see if I have this right ...

    There are a boatload of companies, media, agencies, etc. that RARELY endorse a Presidential candidate but are in this election ...

    The person that seemingly all of these people are endorsing is in a tight race with this person that is considered by so many to be unqualified for the job ...

    What does that say about the other person in the race?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • OZONE
    OZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    Tequilla said:

    So let me see if I have this right ...

    There are a boatload of companies, media, agencies, etc. that RARELY endorse a Presidential candidate but are in this election ...

    The person that seemingly all of these people are endorsing is in a tight race with this person that is considered by so many to be unqualified for the job ...

    What does that say about the other person in the race?

    It says that Trump is such a fucktard, these organizations are willing to endorse a (D) to prevent him from getting close to the White House.

    Great question.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    Fenderbender123 said:

    Just testing to see if anybody actually reads my posts.

    I skimmed it. Seemed like you were defending Trump so up voted.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,566
    edited October 2016
    Does Ozone realize that the more the media endorses Clinton, the more it helps Trump right?

    This would be great news for Ozone, if this campaign followed traditional rules. People trust the media less than they trust either of these candidates. During this campaign, a media endorsement of Hillary Clinton is worth nothing.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • OZONE
    OZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    greenblood said:

    Does Ozone realize that the more the media endorses Clinton, the more it helps Trump right?

    This would be great news for Ozone, if this campaign followed traditional rules. People trust the media less than they trust either of these candidates. During this campaign, a media endorsement of Hillary Clinton is worth nothing.

    I don't think it will affect voting. I think it is a good predictor of the mood of the nation. And the mood is that Trump is such a huge dumbfuck that everybody who is anybody is against him.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,566
    edited October 2016
    OZONE said:

    greenblood said:

    Does Ozone realize that the more the media endorses Clinton, the more it helps Trump right?

    This would be great news for Ozone, if this campaign followed traditional rules. People trust the media less than they trust either of these candidates. During this campaign, a media endorsement of Hillary Clinton is worth nothing.

    I don't think it will affect voting. I think it is a good predictor of the mood of the nation. And the mood is that Trump is such a huge dumbfuck that everybody who is anybody is against him.
    The reason for these endorsements OZONE is that most of these publications were never with Trump, they just never thought he had a chance. But since polls show Trump actually has a decent chance of winning, they are in panic mode and grasping at straws to change the public's mind.

    The media hasn't represented to voice of the people for years. They are just like any other business. There are a couple of influential bodies that push their agenda.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    greenblood said:

    OZONE said:

    greenblood said:

    Does Ozone realize that the more the media endorses Clinton, the more it helps Trump right?

    This would be great news for Ozone, if this campaign followed traditional rules. People trust the media less than they trust either of these candidates. During this campaign, a media endorsement of Hillary Clinton is worth nothing.

    I don't think it will affect voting. I think it is a good predictor of the mood of the nation. And the mood is that Trump is such a huge dumbfuck that everybody who is anybody is against him.
    The reason for these endorsements OZONE is that most of these publications were never with Trump, they just never thought he had a chance. But since polls show Trump actually has a decent chance of winning, they are in panic mode and grasping at straws to change the public's mind.

    The media hasn't represented to voice of the people for years. They are just like any other business. There are a couple of influential bodies that push their agenda.
    Polls show trump with decent chance of winning, lol. He's behind, fighting to fend off landslide numbers at this point. And he's fallen even farther behind in the two weeks since these endorsements started coming out. There you go again (every post) with that poorly educated white trash schtick.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,500
    You CANT make this stuff up
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,566
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    OZONE said:

    greenblood said:

    Does Ozone realize that the more the media endorses Clinton, the more it helps Trump right?

    This would be great news for Ozone, if this campaign followed traditional rules. People trust the media less than they trust either of these candidates. During this campaign, a media endorsement of Hillary Clinton is worth nothing.

    I don't think it will affect voting. I think it is a good predictor of the mood of the nation. And the mood is that Trump is such a huge dumbfuck that everybody who is anybody is against him.
    The reason for these endorsements OZONE is that most of these publications were never with Trump, they just never thought he had a chance. But since polls show Trump actually has a decent chance of winning, they are in panic mode and grasping at straws to change the public's mind.

    The media hasn't represented to voice of the people for years. They are just like any other business. There are a couple of influential bodies that push their agenda.
    Polls show trump with decent chance of winning, lol. He's behind, fighting to fend off landslide numbers at this point. And he's fallen even farther behind in the two weeks since these endorsements started coming out. There you go again (every post) with that poorly educated white trash schtick.
    If you have to talk about how well educated you are, you're most likely not. HTH
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • OZONE
    OZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    greenblood said:

    OZONE said:

    greenblood said:

    Does Ozone realize that the more the media endorses Clinton, the more it helps Trump right?

    This would be great news for Ozone, if this campaign followed traditional rules. People trust the media less than they trust either of these candidates. During this campaign, a media endorsement of Hillary Clinton is worth nothing.

    I don't think it will affect voting. I think it is a good predictor of the mood of the nation. And the mood is that Trump is such a huge dumbfuck that everybody who is anybody is against him.
    The reason for these endorsements OZONE is that most of these publications were never with Trump, they just never thought he had a chance. But since polls show Trump actually has a decent chance of winning, they are in panic mode and grasping at straws to change the public's mind.

    The media hasn't represented to voice of the people for years. They are just like any other business. There are a couple of influential bodies that push their agenda.
    Don't know if you've heard, but Clinton just took the lead in Arizona.

    Maybe you are only looking at the polls that Trump tweets out at 3am?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter