Oh no, that moron posted 5 Reasons on the CardBoard

PurpleReign

That really embarrassing "husky" fan ( I still think he is just a Duck trying to make real dawg fans look bad) posted on the Stanford forum he thinks that Udub will whoop Stanford 34-17:

http://thecardboard.org/board/index.php?topic=15797.0

GrundleStiltzkin

Please be posting on Louisville boreds too

PurpleReign

GrundleStiltzkin said:

Please be posting on Louisville boreds too

If nobody else gets to it by tomorrow evening Ill try to remember to find a good board for that.

PurpleTickler

Naming one of our offensive linemen "Center" was a nice touch.

DoogieMcDoogerson

I really like the Tuf avatar. Solid stuff.

haie

All 6 "card" fans really put that daWg in his place

PurpleReign

Furd fans are out leading Google and inventing new Apples, what can you expect from a fanbase who doesn't live in their momses basements?

Pitchfork51

I had no clue Stanford had a board

Baphomet

I like how it took 8 responses before one of the Stanford fans wrote "hey isn't the game Friday?", because he wasn't sure now.

PostGameOrangeSlices

Penn state fans are smarter than Furd fans

doogsinparadise

It takes a pretty special fan to get his starting QB's name wrong while boasting about his prowess...

ExtraChrisB

Sometimes, it's better just to use your head to post coherent explanations as the heart often thinks with an obtuse structure oblivious of proven facts. Follow with proofreading, careful editing, contemplation, and finally, retraction.


Chincredibled for JR Threezy

rodmansrage

Let's see if I got this right.

You think you are going to win because,

1. Your QB was pretty good in high school.
2. Your OL is fat.
3. You had to abandon your defensive scheme after last weekend's disaster.
4. You have to rely on newbies to find anyone who can move.
5. To win you have to dominate a stat in which your opponent is currently ranked 41 spots ahead of you (36th vs 77th) despite a massive difference in strength of schedule.

Got it.

that, my friends, is one crisp poast.

MelloDawg

I like how the time between defensive scheme changes has reduced from one full year to one full week.

UWerentThereMan

rodmansrage said:

Let's see if I got this right.

You think you are going to win because,

1. Your QB was pretty good in high school.
2. Your OL is fat.
3. You had to abandon your defensive scheme after last weekend's disaster.
4. You have to rely on newbies to find anyone who can move.
5. To win you have to dominate a stat in which your opponent is currently ranked 41 spots ahead of you (36th vs 77th) despite a massive difference in strength of schedule.

Got it.

that, my friends, is one crisp poast.

You think you are going to win because,: *

1. Your QB was pretty good in high school.
2. Your OL is fat.
3. You had to abandon your defensive scheme after last weekend's disaster.
4. You have to rely on newbies to find anyone who can move.
5. To win you have to dominate a stat in which your opponent is currently ranked 41 spots ahead of you (36th vs 77th) despite a massive difference in strength of schedule.

Got it.
<==

longduckdong

You totally owned them. That was awesome bro!
Someone should do this every week. S
It never gets old

whatshouldicareabout

longduckdong said:

You totally owned them. That was awesome bro!
Someone should do this every week. S
It never gets old

Even after 23 times???

doogsinparadise

MelloDawg said:

I like how the time between defensive scheme changes has reduced from one full year to one full week.

UW Football: innovating ways to suck since 2001.

H_D

Lil' Ossai? Are they going to burn his redshirt?

TierbsHsotBoobs

So let me get this straight, your team is going to show up to the wrong stadium ("@ Stanford"?) the day after the game (Saturday?), but somehow double up the score on Stanford?

MelloDawg

Might as well not even play the game