IMO, our rights were/are provided by blood spilled by warriors who fought to provide them for us.
Now what kind of shitweasel thinks it's OK to take those rights lightly because they're afraid?
The Patriot Act is an atrocity and naming it that should have come with a death sentence for those that voted for it. Stop and frisk policies are in the same category, too.
I get what Race is saying, but who the fuck are you gonna fight? And with what?
And what are you fighting for? Rights as a free citizen or an animal-instinct driven survival of the fittest? I am all-in for the former and crushing you in the latter.
I get what Race is saying, but who the fuck are you gonna fight? And with what?
And what are you fighting for? Rights as a free citizen or an animal-instinct driven survival of the fittest? I am all-in for the former and crushing you in the latter.
I get what Race is saying, but who the fuck are you gonna fight? And with what?
And what are you fighting for? Rights as a free citizen or an animal-instinct driven survival of the fittest? I am all-in for the former and crushing you in the latter.
But according to candidate Hillary Clinton and moderator Lester Holt during Monday night’s presidential debate, stop and frisk is “unconstitutional.” They are wrong. In Mrs. Clinton’s case, it’s the usual misrepresenting she does when she does not know what she is talking about. As for Mr. Holt, if a moderator is going to interfere, he should do some homework and not pretend to know the law when he does not. Mr. Holt and NBC cannot overrule the U.S. Supreme Court.
Stop and frisk is based on an 8-1 decision of the Supreme Court, Terry v. Ohio. That ruling hasn’t been overturned or even modified by the court since it was handed down in 1968. Stop and frisk is constitutional and the law of the land. The majority opinion, written by then-Chief Justice Earl Warren, approved the constitutionality of stopping a suspect if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that a person has committed, or was about to commit, a crime. If the officer also has a reasonable suspicion the person is armed, he can conduct a pat-down—that is, a frisk—of a person’s outer clothing.
ENLARGE PHOTO: GETTY IMAGES In many places, this practice is called a “Terry stop,” based on the decision upholding its constitutionality. It is a police technique used by all law enforcement agencies nationwide.
Over a 20-year use of this policy, spanning the administration of two New York City mayors and four police commissioners, stop and frisk played a material part in reducing homicides in New York City. It helped to change New York City from the crime capital of America to the safest large city in the country. In each of those 20 years, approximately six of 10 murder victims in New York City were African-Americans. In other words, stop and frisk saved many black lives.
In the case discussed during Monday’s debate, federal Judge Shira Scheindlin found in 2013 that the way Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Commissioner Ray Kelly applied stop and frisk was unconstitutional. The practice had been expanded to 600,000, the vast majority being of African-Americans. Previously, during my administration, for eight years under Commissioners William Bratton, Howard Safir and Bernard Kerik, the stops and frisks always fell short of 100,000.
During my administration, the U.S. Justice Department spent two years examining stop and frisk and it filed no case. After continued use of the practice during the administration of Mayor Bloomberg and Commissioner Kelly, Judge Scheindlin found that the volume of stops and the focus on the African-American community made the practice not unconstitutional in general but unconstitutional as applied. This is the distinction that is so important—yet was misunderstood by Mr. Holt and misrepresented by Mrs. Clinton.
Stop and frisk is fucktarded. But Trump supports it so Race is all in on taking away rights.
Where did I say I was for it?
That's right. You are just for Trump and therefore won't disagree with his policies.
Race, can you at just once admit Trump says or does something fucktarded. Please show me you are not the lemming you act like on here.
So you lied about it not being constitutional and you lied about me supporting it.
How about you kill yourself and do us all a favor
Except the bill was ruled unconstitutional and you sure are arguing that it's not an awful lot for someone who doesn't support something.
And he goes back to the lie. Stop and frisk is constitutional. One lower judge ruled against it.
Typical low information voter.
I never defended it. I pointed out that you're a lying sack of shit like your girl.
Next lie up
A double post, both defending stop and frisk. But you aren't defending stop and frisk. Holy fuck, Trump does poast here.
But this is from your link, I said stop and frisk was ruled unconstitutional. Your link says the same. Weird.
In the case discussed during Monday’s debate, federal Judge Shira Scheindlin found in 2013 that the way Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Commissioner Ray Kelly applied stop and frisk was unconstitutional
Stop and frisk is bullshit and we shouldn't have it even if it does reduce crime. With that said, this is a total non-issue because Trump isn't going to implement a national stop and frisk policy if he's elected.
Comments
Now what kind of shitweasel thinks it's OK to take those rights lightly because they're afraid?
The Patriot Act is an atrocity and naming it that should have come with a death sentence for those that voted for it. Stop and frisk policies are in the same category, too.
Race, can you at just once admit Trump says or does something fucktarded. Please show me you are not the lemming you act like on here.
How about you kill yourself and do us all a favor
Typical low information voter.
I never defended it. I pointed out that you're a lying sack of shit like your girl.
Next lie up
Stop and frisk is based on an 8-1 decision of the Supreme Court, Terry v. Ohio. That ruling hasn’t been overturned or even modified by the court since it was handed down in 1968. Stop and frisk is constitutional and the law of the land. The majority opinion, written by then-Chief Justice Earl Warren, approved the constitutionality of stopping a suspect if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that a person has committed, or was about to commit, a crime. If the officer also has a reasonable suspicion the person is armed, he can conduct a pat-down—that is, a frisk—of a person’s outer clothing.
ENLARGE
PHOTO: GETTY IMAGES
In many places, this practice is called a “Terry stop,” based on the decision upholding its constitutionality. It is a police technique used by all law enforcement agencies nationwide.
Over a 20-year use of this policy, spanning the administration of two New York City mayors and four police commissioners, stop and frisk played a material part in reducing homicides in New York City. It helped to change New York City from the crime capital of America to the safest large city in the country. In each of those 20 years, approximately six of 10 murder victims in New York City were African-Americans. In other words, stop and frisk saved many black lives.
In the case discussed during Monday’s debate, federal Judge Shira Scheindlin found in 2013 that the way Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Commissioner Ray Kelly applied stop and frisk was unconstitutional. The practice had been expanded to 600,000, the vast majority being of African-Americans. Previously, during my administration, for eight years under Commissioners William Bratton, Howard Safir and Bernard Kerik, the stops and frisks always fell short of 100,000.
During my administration, the U.S. Justice Department spent two years examining stop and frisk and it filed no case. After continued use of the practice during the administration of Mayor Bloomberg and Commissioner Kelly, Judge Scheindlin found that the volume of stops and the focus on the African-American community made the practice not unconstitutional in general but unconstitutional as applied. This is the distinction that is so important—yet was misunderstood by Mr. Holt and misrepresented by Mrs. Clinton.
But this is from your link, I said stop and frisk was ruled unconstitutional. Your link says the same. Weird.
In the case discussed during Monday’s debate, federal Judge Shira Scheindlin found in 2013 that the way Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Commissioner Ray Kelly applied stop and frisk was unconstitutional