Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Winners Win; "He has it in him"
Baseman
Member Posts: 12,369
"Eason’s first true defining drive at Georgia started at his 20-yard line with 3:18 left on the clock against Missouri. Eason moved the Bulldogs into opposing territory but misfired on three passes before the Dawgs called timeout to set up a 4th-and-10 call. Eason found McKenzie in the end zone with just over a minute remaining to cap the 28-27 victory."
GA Junior WR Isiah McKenzie said this after he caught the game winning TD pass from Eason who led Georgia to a comeback victory over Missouri “That means he has it,” McKenzie said after the game. “He has it in him. He keeps his composure in the huddle. He keeps us up high. He encourages us in the huddle. In those situations, you wouldn’t expect that from a freshman. For him to come in there and do what he does, I love it.”
Not to be confused with Jack Browning....Eason delivers. Browning cowers.
"Many have wondered how Jacob Eason would respond when faced with his first true test as Georgia’s starting quarterback, but it’s safe to say the true freshman surpassed even the highest expectations." SEC reporter on Eason
Winners win. Eason>Browning.
Tagged:
Comments
-
Thanks for stating the obvious, basebag.
-
The next time Browning does it will be the first
-
It's for the all the Doogs who didn't get the memoMisterEm said:Thanks for stating the obvious, basebag.
-
You just wait. I know your old and running out of time, but it shouldn't be long.RaceBannon said:The next time Browning does it will be the first
-
Eason definitely had more moxie to start. No one would argue otherwise. It isn't being a doog to say LIPO. You'll probably be proven right in two weeks.
-
Eason's not here so proving I'm right won't happen. Unless Stanford plungers UW - a definite possibility- Browning plays the entire game. If Eason were here, he'd be no worse than second team, and the go-to guy if Browning falters, like he has in pressure situations.Gladstone said:Eason definitely had more moxie to start. No one would argue otherwise. It isn't being a doog to say LIPO. You'll probably be proven right in two weeks.
Clearly, quality QBs aren't lining up to play here. (Don't Doog me about Sirmon in '18)
With the right coach, it shouldn't matter who the incumbent is. It doesn't at big boy schools. A QB with talent and a pair of balls goes in to win the job right away. If he fails that first year, the QB and or OC inspires enough confidence the kid didn't make the wrong decision
Who's your daddy? -
Meh. This is just classic confirmation bias. It's telling because we want it to be telling. But these exact comments are made by players every single time there's a regime change. Sometimes they're telling, sometimes they're not. Time will tell.
Either way it will be interesting. -
And Eason is surrounded by substantially better talent than Browning was as a true frosh ... simple truth.
And as mentioned elsewhere, Browning put the team in position to tie the game at Boise and if it wasn't for fucktards not named him, in a great position to pull the game out. -
Eason plays for Georgia so fuck him.
-
GA Junior WR Isiah McKenzie said this after he caught the game winning TD pass from Eason who led Georgia to a comeback victory over Missouri “That means he has it,” McKenzie said after the game
MIZZOU COMEBACK! SNAP INTO A SLIM JIM -
put the team in position to tie?Tequilla said:And Eason is surrounded by substantially better talent than Browning was as a true frosh ... simple truth.
And as mentioned elsewhere, Browning put the team in position to tie the game at Boise and if it wasn't for fucktards not named him, in a great position to pull the game out.
So he was responsible for pettis' PR TD and the defensive shutout they pitched in the 2nd half? -
If Georgia under Eason had plungered Rutgers, Idaho, and PSU and UW under Browning barely beat Nicholls State and Mizzou, you'd be saying the exact same thing
-
Yes on Eason. If Browning delivered and his team won two tight games, which he's never done, I'd feel differently about Browning.bananasnblondes said:If Georgia under Eason had plungered Rutgers, Idaho, and PSU and UW under Browning barely beat Nicholls State and Mizzou, you'd be saying the exact same thing
Either way, Eason is the better QB. He went to HS in Washington. UW wanted him, but couldn't close him. -
So it's a plus for Eason that he sucked for most of four quarters against two shit teams and then barely pulled it out in the end (well actually Lambert had to come in for the last series against Nicholls but who is counting.)Baseman said:
Yes on Eason. If Browning delivered and his team won two tight games, which he's never done, I'd feel differently about Browning.bananasnblondes said:If Georgia under Eason had plungered Rutgers, Idaho, and PSU and UW under Browning barely beat Nicholls State and Mizzou, you'd be saying the exact same thing
Either way, Eason is the better QB. He went to HS in Washington. UW wanted him, but couldn't close him. -
CHRIST
-
You would have benched Billy Joe HobartFremontTroll said:
So it's a plus for Eason that he sucked for most of four quarters against two shit teams and then barely pulled it out in the end (well actually Lambert had to come in for the last series against Nicholls but who is counting.)Baseman said:
Yes on Eason. If Browning delivered and his team won two tight games, which he's never done, I'd feel differently about Browning.bananasnblondes said:If Georgia under Eason had plungered Rutgers, Idaho, and PSU and UW under Browning barely beat Nicholls State and Mizzou, you'd be saying the exact same thing
Either way, Eason is the better QB. He went to HS in Washington. UW wanted him, but couldn't close him. -
/threadbananasnblondes said:If Georgia under Eason had plungered Rutgers, Idaho, and PSU and UW under Browning barely beat Nicholls State and Mizzou, you'd be saying the exact same thing
-
This thread is as fucking stupid as the "Eason officially a bust" thread two weeks ago.
Transitive property says crowing a QB for barely beating doog legend Gary Pinkel makes you a doog.
LIFPO -
How many games did UW lose with Hobart at the helm, Race?RaceBannon said:
You would have benched Billy Joe HobartFremontTroll said:
So it's a plus for Eason that he sucked for most of four quarters against two shit teams and then barely pulled it out in the end (well actually Lambert had to come in for the last series against Nicholls but who is counting.)Baseman said:
Yes on Eason. If Browning delivered and his team won two tight games, which he's never done, I'd feel differently about Browning.bananasnblondes said:If Georgia under Eason had plungered Rutgers, Idaho, and PSU and UW under Browning barely beat Nicholls State and Mizzou, you'd be saying the exact same thing
Either way, Eason is the better QB. He went to HS in Washington. UW wanted him, but couldn't close him. -
dnc said:
This thread is as fucking stupid as the "Eason officially a bust" thread two weeks ago.
Transitive property says crowing a QB for barely beating doog legend Gary Pinkel makes you a doog.
LIFPO
Eason is a winner until he's not. Hope this helps. -
My point is he would look like shit for three quarters then winBaseman said:
How many games did UW lose with Hobart at the helm, Race?RaceBannon said:
You would have benched Billy Joe HobartFremontTroll said:
So it's a plus for Eason that he sucked for most of four quarters against two shit teams and then barely pulled it out in the end (well actually Lambert had to come in for the last series against Nicholls but who is counting.)Baseman said:
Yes on Eason. If Browning delivered and his team won two tight games, which he's never done, I'd feel differently about Browning.bananasnblondes said:If Georgia under Eason had plungered Rutgers, Idaho, and PSU and UW under Browning barely beat Nicholls State and Mizzou, you'd be saying the exact same thing
Either way, Eason is the better QB. He went to HS in Washington. UW wanted him, but couldn't close him.
Like the Nebraska game?
-
Our ewe knew hear? Everyone is a loser until they aren't. One win doesn't make you cease being a loser.Baseman said:dnc said:This thread is as fucking stupid as the "Eason officially a bust" thread two weeks ago.
Transitive property says crowing a QB for barely beating doog legend Gary Pinkel makes you a doog.
LIFPO
Eason is a winner until he's not. Hope this helps. -
0. Old fuckers like us remember what winners looked like and most importantly what winners actually did.RaceBannon said:
My point is he would look like shit for three quarters then winBaseman said:
How many games did UW lose with Hobart at the helm, Race?RaceBannon said:
You would have benched Billy Joe HobartFremontTroll said:
So it's a plus for Eason that he sucked for most of four quarters against two shit teams and then barely pulled it out in the end (well actually Lambert had to come in for the last series against Nicholls but who is counting.)Baseman said:
Yes on Eason. If Browning delivered and his team won two tight games, which he's never done, I'd feel differently about Browning.bananasnblondes said:If Georgia under Eason had plungered Rutgers, Idaho, and PSU and UW under Browning barely beat Nicholls State and Mizzou, you'd be saying the exact same thing
Either way, Eason is the better QB. He went to HS in Washington. UW wanted him, but couldn't close him.
Like the Nebraska game?
Eason has the highest ceiling of any HS QB ever to come out of the state of Washington. Peterman didn't get him. Our current guy so far has caved under pressure.
while Eason so far has delivered in crunch time and has a higher ceiling.
You Doogs can bump this thread when Washington wins ten games and the conference
-
Higher than Drew Bledsoe?Baseman said:
0. Old fuckers like us remember what winners looked like and most importantly what winners actually did.RaceBannon said:
My point is he would look like shit for three quarters then winBaseman said:
How many games did UW lose with Hobart at the helm, Race?RaceBannon said:
You would have benched Billy Joe HobartFremontTroll said:
So it's a plus for Eason that he sucked for most of four quarters against two shit teams and then barely pulled it out in the end (well actually Lambert had to come in for the last series against Nicholls but who is counting.)Baseman said:
Yes on Eason. If Browning delivered and his team won two tight games, which he's never done, I'd feel differently about Browning.bananasnblondes said:If Georgia under Eason had plungered Rutgers, Idaho, and PSU and UW under Browning barely beat Nicholls State and Mizzou, you'd be saying the exact same thing
Either way, Eason is the better QB. He went to HS in Washington. UW wanted him, but couldn't close him.
Like the Nebraska game?
Eason has the highest ceiling of any HS QB ever to come out of the state of Washington. Peterman didn't get him. Our current guy so far has caved under pressure.
while Eason so far has delivered in crunch time and has a higher ceiling.
You Doogs can bump this thread when Washington actually wins something.
Easy there turbo.
I like Eason and I'm mad we didn't get him. But if we did get him and someone was making these claims after a marginal win over Gary Fucking Pinkel you'd rightly mock the shit out of them.
Slow the fuck down. -
Do you want to talk about the fact that Eason put up a goose egg offensively in the 2nd half UNTIL that drive? Probably doesn't fit the narrative.dhdawg said:
put the team in position to tie?Tequilla said:And Eason is surrounded by substantially better talent than Browning was as a true frosh ... simple truth.
as mentioned elsewhere, Browning put the team in position to tie the game at Boise and if it wasn't for fucktards not named him, in a great position to pull the game out.
So he was responsible for pettis' PR TD and the defensive shutout they pitched in the 2nd half?
The point being that the part where you're destroying Browning is because he has yet to lead a game winning drive at the end of the game. As others have pointed out, Browning put the team in a position to at least get a tie against Boise and the fuck ups in that situation had NOTHING to do with what he did. Which again, that probably doesn't fit the narrative.
Now, if you want to go game by game on Browning in the losses last year:
Vs. Cal: Last drive with the ball was a 1 yard gain by Browning, -2 yards on a sack, and then an INT on 3rd and 11 ... definitely not a good drive. Prior drive before that was a FG to get the game to a 1 score game and the drive before that was on pace to be a scoring drive as well before a DWash fumble. The drive before that was also a TD (and then Cal's possession was a fumble TD). So while the last drive was absolutely a turd, the 3 prior drives were all very solid by Browning.
Vs. Oregon: The Oregon game in an incomplete on Browning because in his last drive he scored a TD to bring the game to 1 score with 3:35 left in the game (plenty of time to get a stop and another score). However, Browning sustained an injury on the TD scoring drive and the final drive was handled by an inexperienced and overmatched Magna Carta.
Vs. Stanford: Didn't play ... not in a position to lead a game winning drive
Vs. Utah: Not a great weather day where UW was playing catch up from the get go being down 21-6 in the 2nd quarter. Browning had 2 drives in the game that can be pointed to ... one at down 24-23 and one down 31-23 in the 4th quarter. In the first drive, that was a 3 play for -6 yard drive that ended in a punt. The plays there were a -2 yard play by Browning (sack) with a fumble recovered by UW, then the questionable PI play on Perkins that moved them back another 15 yards, another sack for -6, before Gaskin ran for 17 yards or something like that. The next series started with an 11 yard pass for a first down before Browning lost a fumble on a sack by Kyle Fitts. This is exactly the type of play that has been talked about on the TSIO Podcast and the chief concern of @Dennis_DeYoung of the success of this team going forward this year.
@ ASU: UW was outscored 24-0 in the 2nd half and this is the #1 game where my criticism of Jonathan Smith was at obscene levels with how predictable his play calling was. The drives in the 2nd half consisted of a 3 and out (3 plays for -4 yards, sack), turnover on downs (7 plays for 40 yards), missed FG (10 plays for 61 yards), 3 and out (3 plays for -10 yards, sack), INT (6 plays for 31 yards) ... and once the game got to 27-17 ASU, INT (4 plays for 36 yards), Fumble (by Josh Perkins, 3 plays for 36 yards), and INT (possession started at 20 seconds left). This is the game where I think everybody really looks at Browning as panicking under the pressure with the turnover after turnover in the 2nd half. The reality is that this game was a fuck up on so many different levels starting in the 1st half with a boatload of missed plays that could have put the game away before half.
I do understand the criticism of Browning and his play has been definitely inconsistent in these types of situations. How much of it is because he's scared in those moments versus perhaps trying to do too much is probably debatable. Will we know how much he's grown in this area until he's faced with this situation this year ... probably not.
Circling back to Eason, for as much as some may want to look at things with Eason and use that as confirmation bias, the reality is that in his 2 games as a starter he's won the games by a grand total of 3 points versus Nichols and Mizzou ... probably 2 of the easier games on the Georgia schedule. If he can perform well this weekend at Ole Miss I'll be impressed. More likely to me though that they get spanked down there.
TL, DR: Fuck off on crowning Eason ... classic confirmation bias. Browning is far from perfect in "clutch" end of game situations but at the same time he had a lot of help in pissing some games away. -
dnc said:
Higher than Drew Bledsoe?Baseman said:
0. Old fuckers like us remember what winners looked like and most importantly what winners actually did.RaceBannon said:
My point is he would look like shit for three quarters then winBaseman said:
How many games did UW lose with Hobart at the helm, Race?RaceBannon said:
You would have benched Billy Joe HobartFremontTroll said:
So it's a plus for Eason that he sucked for most of four quarters against two shit teams and then barely pulled it out in the end (well actually Lambert had to come in for the last series against Nicholls but who is counting.)Baseman said:
Yes on Eason. If Browning delivered and his team won two tight games, which he's never done, I'd feel differently about Browning.bananasnblondes said:If Georgia under Eason had plungered Rutgers, Idaho, and PSU and UW under Browning barely beat Nicholls State and Mizzou, you'd be saying the exact same thing
Either way, Eason is the better QB. He went to HS in Washington. UW wanted him, but couldn't close him.
Like the Nebraska game?
Eason has the highest ceiling of any HS QB ever to come out of the state of Washington. Peterman didn't get him. Our current guy so far has caved under pressure.
while Eason so far has delivered in crunch time and has a higher ceiling.
You Doogs can bump this thread when Washington actually wins something.
Easy there turbo.
I like Eason and I'm mad we didn't get him. But if we did get him and someone was making these claims after a marginal win over Gary Fucking Pinkel you'd rightly mock the shit out of them.
Slow you're role. -
Tequilla said:
Do you want to talk about the fact that Eason put up a goose egg offensively in the 2nd half UNTIL that drive? Probably doesn't fit the narrative.dhdawg said:
put the team in position to tie?Tequilla said:And Eason is surrounded by substantially better talent than Browning was as a true frosh ... simple truth.
as mentioned elsewhere, Browning put the team in position to tie the game at Boise and if it wasn't for fucktards not named him, in a great position to pull the game out.
So he was responsible for pettis' PR TD and the defensive shutout they pitched in the 2nd half?
The point being that the part where you're destroying Browning is because he has yet to lead a game winning drive at the end of the game. As others have pointed out, Browning put the team in a position to at least get a tie against Boise and the fuck ups in that situation had NOTHING to do with what he did. Which again, that probably doesn't fit the narrative.
Now, if you want to go game by game on Browning in the losses last year:
Vs. Cal: Last drive with the ball was a 1 yard gain by Browning, -2 yards on a sack, and then an INT on 3rd and 11 ... definitely not a good drive. Prior drive before that was a FG to get the game to a 1 score game and the drive before that was on pace to be a scoring drive as well before a DWash fumble. The drive before that was also a TD (and then Cal's possession was a fumble TD). So while the last drive was absolutely a turd, the 3 prior drives were all very solid by Browning. WE FUCKING LOST
Vs. Oregon: The Oregon game in an incomplete on Browning because in his last drive he scored a TD to bring the game to 1 score with 3:35 left in the game (plenty of time to get a stop and another score). However, Browning sustained an injury on the TD scoring drive and the final drive was handled by an inexperienced and overmatched Magna Carta.
WE FUCKING LOST
Vs. Stanford: Didn't play ... not in a position to lead a game winning drive WE FUCKING LOST
Vs. Utah: Not a great weather day where UW was playing catch up from the get go being down 21-6 in the 2nd quarter. Browning had 2 drives in the game that can be pointed to ... one at down 24-23 and one down 31-23 in the 4th quarter. In the first drive, that was a 3 play for -6 yard drive that ended in a punt. The plays there were a -2 yard play by Browning (sack) with a fumble recovered by UW, then the questionable PI play on Perkins that moved them back another 15 yards, another sack for -6, before Gaskin ran for 17 yards or something like that. The next series started with an 11 yard pass for a first down before Browning lost a fumble on a sack by Kyle Fitts. This is exactly the type of play that has been talked about on the TSIO Podcast and the chief concern of @Dennis_DeYoung of the success of this team going forward this year. WE FUCKING LOST
@ ASU: UW was outscored 24-0 in the 2nd half and this is the #1 game where my criticism of Jonathan Smith was at obscene levels with how predictable his play calling was. The drives in the 2nd half consisted of a 3 and out (3 plays for -4 yards, sack), turnover on downs (7 plays for 40 yards), missed FG (10 plays for 61 yards), 3 and out (3 plays for -10 yards, sack), INT (6 plays for 31 yards) ... and once the game got to 27-17 ASU, INT (4 plays for 36 yards), Fumble (by Josh Perkins, 3 plays for 36 yards), and INT (possession started at 20 seconds left). This is the game where I think everybody really looks at Browning as panicking under the pressure with the turnover after turnover in the 2nd half. The reality is that this game was a fuck up on so many different levels starting in the 1st half with a boatload of missed plays that could have put the game away before half.
WE FUCKING LOSTI do understand the criticism of Browning and his play has been definitely inconsistent in these types of situations. How much of it is because he's scared in those moments versus perhaps trying to do too much is probably debatable. Will we know how much he's grown in this area until he's faced with this situation this year ... probably not.
Circling back to Eason, for as much as some may want to look at things with Eason and use that as confirmation bias, the reality is that in his 2 games as a starter he's won the games by a grand total of 3 points versus Nichols and Mizzou ... probably 2 of the easier games on the Georgia schedule. If he can perform well this weekend at Ole Miss I'll be impressed. More likely to me though that they get spanked down there.
TL, DR: Fuck off on crowning Eason ... classic confirmation bias. Browning is far from perfect in "clutch" end of game situations but at the same time he had a lot of help in pissing some games away. -
Shut the fuck up with this Eason jock riding.Baseman said:
0. Old fuckers like us remember what winners looked like and most importantly what winners actually did.RaceBannon said:
My point is he would look like shit for three quarters then winBaseman said:
How many games did UW lose with Hobart at the helm, Race?RaceBannon said:
You would have benched Billy Joe HobartFremontTroll said:
So it's a plus for Eason that he sucked for most of four quarters against two shit teams and then barely pulled it out in the end (well actually Lambert had to come in for the last series against Nicholls but who is counting.)Baseman said:
Yes on Eason. If Browning delivered and his team won two tight games, which he's never done, I'd feel differently about Browning.bananasnblondes said:If Georgia under Eason had plungered Rutgers, Idaho, and PSU and UW under Browning barely beat Nicholls State and Mizzou, you'd be saying the exact same thing
Either way, Eason is the better QB. He went to HS in Washington. UW wanted him, but couldn't close him.
Like the Nebraska game?
Eason has the highest ceiling of any HS QB ever to come out of the state of Washington. Peterman didn't get him. Our current guy so far has caved under pressure.
while Eason so far has delivered in crunch time and has a higher ceiling.
You Doogs can bump this thread when Washington wins ten games and the conference -
Didn't even think about reading all of this bullshit.Tequilla said:
Do you want to talk about the fact that Eason put up a goose egg offensively in the 2nd half UNTIL that drive? Probably doesn't fit the narrative.dhdawg said:
put the team in position to tie?Tequilla said:And Eason is surrounded by substantially better talent than Browning was as a true frosh ... simple truth.
as mentioned elsewhere, Browning put the team in position to tie the game at Boise and if it wasn't for fucktards not named him, in a great position to pull the game out.
So he was responsible for pettis' PR TD and the defensive shutout they pitched in the 2nd half?
The point being that the part where you're destroying Browning is because he has yet to lead a game winning drive at the end of the game. As others have pointed out, Browning put the team in a position to at least get a tie against Boise and the fuck ups in that situation had NOTHING to do with what he did. Which again, that probably doesn't fit the narrative.
Now, if you want to go game by game on Browning in the losses last year:
Vs. Cal: Last drive with the ball was a 1 yard gain by Browning, -2 yards on a sack, and then an INT on 3rd and 11 ... definitely not a good drive. Prior drive before that was a FG to get the game to a 1 score game and the drive before that was on pace to be a scoring drive as well before a DWash fumble. The drive before that was also a TD (and then Cal's possession was a fumble TD). So while the last drive was absolutely a turd, the 3 prior drives were all very solid by Browning.
Vs. Oregon: The Oregon game in an incomplete on Browning because in his last drive he scored a TD to bring the game to 1 score with 3:35 left in the game (plenty of time to get a stop and another score). However, Browning sustained an injury on the TD scoring drive and the final drive was handled by an inexperienced and overmatched Magna Carta.
Vs. Stanford: Didn't play ... not in a position to lead a game winning drive
Vs. Utah: Not a great weather day where UW was playing catch up from the get go being down 21-6 in the 2nd quarter. Browning had 2 drives in the game that can be pointed to ... one at down 24-23 and one down 31-23 in the 4th quarter. In the first drive, that was a 3 play for -6 yard drive that ended in a punt. The plays there were a -2 yard play by Browning (sack) with a fumble recovered by UW, then the questionable PI play on Perkins that moved them back another 15 yards, another sack for -6, before Gaskin ran for 17 yards or something like that. The next series started with an 11 yard pass for a first down before Browning lost a fumble on a sack by Kyle Fitts. This is exactly the type of play that has been talked about on the TSIO Podcast and the chief concern of @Dennis_DeYoung of the success of this team going forward this year.
@ ASU: UW was outscored 24-0 in the 2nd half and this is the #1 game where my criticism of Jonathan Smith was at obscene levels with how predictable his play calling was. The drives in the 2nd half consisted of a 3 and out (3 plays for -4 yards, sack), turnover on downs (7 plays for 40 yards), missed FG (10 plays for 61 yards), 3 and out (3 plays for -10 yards, sack), INT (6 plays for 31 yards) ... and once the game got to 27-17 ASU, INT (4 plays for 36 yards), Fumble (by Josh Perkins, 3 plays for 36 yards), and INT (possession started at 20 seconds left). This is the game where I think everybody really looks at Browning as panicking under the pressure with the turnover after turnover in the 2nd half. The reality is that this game was a fuck up on so many different levels starting in the 1st half with a boatload of missed plays that could have put the game away before half.
I do understand the criticism of Browning and his play has been definitely inconsistent in these types of situations. How much of it is because he's scared in those moments versus perhaps trying to do too much is probably debatable. Will we know how much he's grown in this area until he's faced with this situation this year ... probably not.
Circling back to Eason, for as much as some may want to look at things with Eason and use that as confirmation bias, the reality is that in his 2 games as a starter he's won the games by a grand total of 3 points versus Nichols and Mizzou ... probably 2 of the easier games on the Georgia schedule. If he can perform well this weekend at Ole Miss I'll be impressed. More likely to me though that they get spanked down there.
TL, DR: Fuck off on crowning Eason ... classic confirmation bias. Browning is far from perfect in "clutch" end of game situations but at the same time he had a lot of help in pissing some games away.
