Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Someone explain this to me...

135

Comments

  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,379
    Tequilla said:

    Eason isn't starting ahead of Browning by the Stanford game ... that's insanely FS

    When Stanford is ahead in the third quarter and Browning is who we know he is, Eason comes in and mans up.
  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,425
    AVT will ultimately commit to us.
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,379
    Tequilla said:

    Eason isn't starting ahead of Browning by the Stanford game ... that's insanely FS

    When Stanford is ahead in the third quarter and Browning is who we know he is, Eason comes in and mans up and would start the week after IMO. It won't happen because he's not here. Im dealing in hypotheticals.

    I'm less worried about the QB situation than the OL. That said, contending programs don't have trouble attracting QB prospects every year. Sure, Eason probably chose Georgia because he had a clearer path to start but in three years, Peterman has landed one quality QB recruit. Sirmon may be a 5-star but is two years away. If UW slips- history shows they will- is Sirmon a lock?

    For the rest of you, what do you disagree with? Eason will be >Browning against real competition? The OL recruiting doesn't suck?
    I agree with most of Pepsi's poast but Im not ready to buy Banvileau comes here. Ahmed probably comes here, word is he is a DB - and UW is killing it there already.

    Recruit Quality/Trend
    QB: -
    RB: -
    WR: +
    OL: -
    DL: +
    LB: +
    DB: +
  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,425
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    biak1 said:

    Recruiting Lag Theory?

    Waiting for @StephenHawkingDAWG to weigh in here.

    I came up with this more than a decade ago.

    The short theory is this:
    Doing well in a season helps your SECOND recruiting class in the future.

    Example - UW goes 11-2 this season. It won't get many great new recruits in January 2017 because most of them are already committed but UW would get a big bump with its 2018 recruiting class.
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,379
    Gladstone said:

    RB: - ?

    what

    RB recruiting.
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,379
    edited September 2016

    Recruiting can not be great if it is great "other than the O line". If we still aren't recruiting the O line we may as well cut our dicks off because we won't be fucking the prom queen.

    No more excuses - get a line and a quarterback or get the fuck out. Eason should be starting here this year

    Will you write my next recruiting poast?