Mad Son's Ramblings: Year Three is Prove-It Time for Petersen
Comments
-
The other night I was Dilaudid-sext-ranting to Coker about Bayesian analysis and why you have to take all years of Petersen as meaningful prices.Dennis_DeYoung said:
THIS!Mad_Son said:I feel like a broken record. I know Rutgers was keying on the run and giving us the pass. That doesn't change that I didn't see the results I needed to see that something had changed. Null hypothesis is that things are the same until shown otherwise.
He deserves a medal. -
Mad Son you are a tard. Year 3 isnt "prove-it" time for ANY coach, at ANY level of big time football. Especially at Washington, where Sark left a program worse off than USC after 3 years of brutal sanctions.
Read Weak 1...at least Its accurate, truthful and relevant -
Puppy wanted Sark to have a 6th year. People forget that.
-
I am glad you explained that. I didn't want to ask and look stoopid.Mad_Son said:I feel like a broken record. I know Rutgers was keying on the run and giving us the pass. That doesn't change that I didn't see the results I needed to see that something had changed. Null hypothesis is that things are the same until shown otherwise.
-
I don't know what this means but I think it explains why youDennis_DeYoung said:
The other night I was Dilaudid-sext-ranting to Coker about Bayesian analysis and why you have to take all years of Petersen as meaningful prices.Dennis_DeYoung said:
THIS!Mad_Son said:I feel like a broken record. I know Rutgers was keying on the run and giving us the pass. That doesn't change that I didn't see the results I needed to see that something had changed. Null hypothesis is that things are the same until shown otherwise.
He deserves a medal.havehad a Maserati and I don't. -
Uh, pup wanted him gone before he ever stepped on field dipshit.PurpleJ said:Puppy wanted Sark to have a 6th year. People forget that.
-
Basically you want to know the probability that Petersen is a good coach given you've seen his record so far. The odds of you seeing that are the odds of his record given he is good, times the odds of him being good, normalized by the overall chances of him having that record (like if he is good or if he is bad, or inbetween). The more we see the more we understand about the odds of him being good.Swaye said:
I don't know what this means but I think it explains why youDennis_DeYoung said:
The other night I was Dilaudid-sext-ranting to Coker about Bayesian analysis and why you have to take all years of Petersen as meaningful prices.Dennis_DeYoung said:
THIS!Mad_Son said:I feel like a broken record. I know Rutgers was keying on the run and giving us the pass. That doesn't change that I didn't see the results I needed to see that something had changed. Null hypothesis is that things are the same until shown otherwise.
He deserves a medal.havehad a Maserati and I don't. -
Mad Cunt sit down, im going to knock some smarts into your ignant little gine.Mad_Son said:I feel like a broken record. I know Rutgers was keying on the run and giving us the pass. That doesn't change that I didn't see the results I needed to see that something had changed. Null hypothesis is that things are the same until shown otherwise.
Petersen ran the ball last year ahead of schedule. If you watched the 1st half, when Browning Was throwing the ball, you saw Gaskin was shredding Rutgers on toss sweeps, stretch plays and other runs indicitive of a building and powerful oline run or pass.
Your dumbass is drawing conclusions from a team up by 30-something, simply trying to burn clock. Everyone includ I ng Rutgers knew Browning was done taking shots downfi e ld. Pedderson and Smith were simply working on the running game versus an 8-man box and the strength of Rutgers, the defensive line.
Now just shut your hole and watch the running game going forward, with the threat of the pass, the long ball to Ross, Pettis; Chico, the wheel route to Dotson (who has great hands. Didnt know that did you Sonny?), etc that we saw in the 1st half. See the reason now that Gaskin found yardage more difficult to find in the 2nd half? Everyone knew the run was coming in case you didnt understand.
You armchairs qb's crack me up. You MadSon the starter. 1st team dipshit, backed up by J, then Boob. Race on the practice squad. -
Liar. You openly campaigned for his 6th year.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Uh, pup wanted him gone before he ever stepped on field dipshit.PurpleJ said:Puppy wanted Sark to have a 6th year. People forget that.
-
J that aint close to true. I was here bashing Sark in 2013. I bashed Sark on Dawgman from day 1, whic h is why I got banned. Now here, I remember why I dont come here...but will as I like to drag your pussy through the mud.PurpleJ said:
Liar. You openly campaigned for his 6th year.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Uh, pup wanted him gone before he ever stepped on field dipshit.PurpleJ said:Puppy wanted Sark to have a 6th year. People forget that.
Now if your going to lie about Pup wanting Sark, find proof. I was the original on the topic Ty's 0-12 team Sark took over was better than Sark's team when he left. Now I see your brain firing up a memory , which are few and far between
