Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Mad Son's Ramblings: Year Three is Prove-It Time for Petersen
Comments
-
The toss sweep to Gaskin is a vital cog in this offense. ESPECIALLY to the weakside. You know why buffer? Fuck no you have no idea. At least theres a few guys at dawgman that understand the x's and O's. Yous guys are the biggest collection of nimrods ive ever seen.TurdBuffer said:
THIS.Tequilla said:
There were numerous snaps where Rutgers had all 11 defenders within 8-10 yards of the LOS.doogville said:Rutgers didn't really sell out to stop the run. They were playing with 2 safeties back.
UW lineman just straight whiffed on some blocks (or weren't in sync with each other). It's concerning, but also the type of shit that can be cleaned up quick.
Either way it will be interesting
When you are hitting as many bombs as we did, that tells you that the safeties are out of position to defend those and that's usually driven by their focus being on slowing down the run game.
It was obvious as fuck Rutgers chief concern was defending the run game all day long. The passing game worked good enough, but there is still too much fuckery as Roady aptly points out. Could we just retire the toss sweep to McClatcher and the zero net yard fucking bubble screens? We should all expect a double-reverse flea-flicker that goes for 5 yards and injures a key player in game 2 or 3. Smiff is hard as a rock just thinking about it.
Despite the fuckery, UW will win at least 9, because the O has improved enough to execute when they need to. -
Schools like Maryland, Arizona, Cal, and Rutgers, etc should be happy with 7-8 wins when they can get them
Again, fuck you -
Flagged for September rankings bullshit.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Baby steps Baabs. If u actually read on you'd notice why being patient is paramount. Charlie Strong didnt do it in 2 years either. It was evident his emphasis on a power downhill running game with a reliable passing game would work. Just didnt have the horses left over from Mack. He brilliantly moved Hurd to WR and brought in a true freshman qb who could actually complete a forward pass. Didnt Petersen do the same thing Babby? Now, coincidentally both teams are in the top 15. Coincidence it is not however. Just patience. Unfortunately most of you bonio's here have zero.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Going from 4-5 to 5-4 is a big improvement. Everybody says so.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Its Peter's 3rd year. If he goes 9-4 thats a big improvement. A coach shouldnt be judged till his 4th-5th year. Especially a complete overhaul of a program. Been saying for 2 years, anything that happens this year is a bonus and year ahead of schedule.RoadDawg55 said:
I'm a true nega dawg and fully believe we suck until proven otherwise, but I'm not dumb enough to complain about the beat down we put on Rutgers. The team dos what they had to do. We'll find out after the Arizona and Stanford games.Mad_Son said:
TSIO is 100% not the point...TurdBuffer said:Mad Dog TSIO = Too Soon. Drink heavily and relax 'til game #4. Utterly meaningless games 'til then.
Enjoy the rebuilding process. Enjoy the games, the indibidual play. If Pete wins north he'll be consensus pac12 coach of year. And deservedly so. -
Give my best to purpledoogfanpuppylove_sugarsteel said:
The toss sweep to Gaskin is a vital cog in this offense. ESPECIALLY to the weakside. You know why buffer? Fuck no you have no idea. At least theres a few guys at dawgman that understand the x's and O's. Yous guys are the biggest collection of nimrods ive ever seen.TurdBuffer said:
THIS.Tequilla said:
There were numerous snaps where Rutgers had all 11 defenders within 8-10 yards of the LOS.doogville said:Rutgers didn't really sell out to stop the run. They were playing with 2 safeties back.
UW lineman just straight whiffed on some blocks (or weren't in sync with each other). It's concerning, but also the type of shit that can be cleaned up quick.
Either way it will be interesting
When you are hitting as many bombs as we did, that tells you that the safeties are out of position to defend those and that's usually driven by their focus being on slowing down the run game.
It was obvious as fuck Rutgers chief concern was defending the run game all day long. The passing game worked good enough, but there is still too much fuckery as Roady aptly points out. Could we just retire the toss sweep to McClatcher and the zero net yard fucking bubble screens? We should all expect a double-reverse flea-flicker that goes for 5 yards and injures a key player in game 2 or 3. Smiff is hard as a rock just thinking about it.
Despite the fuckery, UW will win at least 9, because the O has improved enough to execute when they need to. -
puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Baby steps Baabs. If u actually read on you'd notice why being patient is paramount. Charlie Strong didnt do it in 2 years either. It was evident his emphasis on a power downhill running game with a reliable passing game would work. Just didnt have the horses left over from Mack. He brilliantly moved Hurd to WR and brought in a true freshman qb who could actually complete a forward pass. Didnt Petersen do the same thing Babby? Now, coincidentally both teams are in the top 15. Coincidence it is not however. Just patience. Unfortunately most of you bonio's here have zero.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Going from 4-5 to 5-4 is a big improvement. Everybody says so.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Its Peter's 3rd year. If he goes 9-4 thats a big improvement. A coach shouldnt be judged till his 4th-5th year. Especially a complete overhaul of a program. Been saying for 2 years, anything that happens this year is a bonus and year ahead of schedule.RoadDawg55 said:
I'm a true nega dawg and fully believe we suck until proven otherwise, but I'm not dumb enough to complain about the beat down we put on Rutgers. The team dos what they had to do. We'll find out after the Arizona and Stanford games.Mad_Son said:
TSIO is 100% not the point...TurdBuffer said:Mad Dog TSIO = Too Soon. Drink heavily and relax 'til game #4. Utterly meaningless games 'til then.
Enjoy the rebuilding process. Enjoy the games, the indibidual play. If Pete wins north he'll be consensus pac12 coach of year. And deservedly so.
UW's recent deficiency in the "Power Downhill Running Game" -
This is so FS, I can't believe I read it . . . "Take away those special teams touch downs, and the three long passes in the first quarter and the final score is 13-13."
Yes, take away five touchdowns and the game was close. Excellent analysis of quarters 2-4 of game that was over after 15 minutes.
So tell Ross to fair catch a kick so Gaskin can grind down the field? Tell Browning not to check deep when Ross has man coverage?
There's nothing to take from this game except they beat a shitty team and backups played. Same for the next two weeks.
Call me when Stanford comes to town. -
The point is there was nothing that demonstrated consistency. The point is that while the result was good it was not as dominating as it looks. The point is it had shown us no evidence of improvement. The point is Petersen has not proven he is the one yet.NotTheCase said:This is so FS, I can't believe I read it . . . "Take away those special teams touch downs, and the three long passes in the first quarter and the final score is 13-13."
Yes, take away five touchdowns and the game was close. Excellent analysis of quarters 2-4 of game that was over after 15 minutes.
So tell Ross to fair catch a kick so Gaskin can grind down the field? Tell Browning not to check deep when Ross has man coverage?
There's nothing to take from this game except they beat a shitty team and backups played. Same for the next two weeks.
Call me when Stanford comes to town. -
I'll take things Doog losers say for $1000, Alex.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Baby steps Baabs. If u actually read on you'd notice why being patient is paramount. Charlie Strong didnt do it in 2 years either. It was evident his emphasis on a power downhill running game with a reliable passing game would work. Just didnt have the horses left over from Mack. He brilliantly moved Hurd to WR and brought in a true freshman qb who could actually complete a forward pass. Didnt Petersen do the same thing Babby? Now, coincidentally both teams are in the top 15. Coincidence it is not however. Just patience. Unfortunately most of you bonio's here have zero.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Going from 4-5 to 5-4 is a big improvement. Everybody says so.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Its Peter's 3rd year. If he goes 9-4 thats a big improvement. A coach shouldnt be judged till his 4th-5th year. Especially a complete overhaul of a program. Been saying for 2 years, anything that happens this year is a bonus and year ahead of schedule.RoadDawg55 said:
I'm a true nega dawg and fully believe we suck until proven otherwise, but I'm not dumb enough to complain about the beat down we put on Rutgers. The team dos what they had to do. We'll find out after the Arizona and Stanford games.Mad_Son said:
TSIO is 100% not the point...TurdBuffer said:Mad Dog TSIO = Too Soon. Drink heavily and relax 'til game #4. Utterly meaningless games 'til then.
Enjoy the rebuilding process. Enjoy the games, the indibidual play. If Pete wins north he'll be consensus pac12 coach of year. And deservedly so. -
I said McClatcher, not Gaskin, you shrill cunt. Get back on your meds, Puppy, or put your glasses on. As Andy Kaufman-like funny as you can be at times, you're obviously still batshit crazy like him too.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
The toss sweep to Gaskin is a vital cog in this offense. ESPECIALLY to the weakside. You know why buffer? Fuck no you have no idea. At least theres a few guys at dawgman that understand the x's and O's. Yous guys are the biggest collection of nimrods ive ever seen.TurdBuffer said:
THIS.Tequilla said:
There were numerous snaps where Rutgers had all 11 defenders within 8-10 yards of the LOS.doogville said:Rutgers didn't really sell out to stop the run. They were playing with 2 safeties back.
UW lineman just straight whiffed on some blocks (or weren't in sync with each other). It's concerning, but also the type of shit that can be cleaned up quick.
Either way it will be interesting
When you are hitting as many bombs as we did, that tells you that the safeties are out of position to defend those and that's usually driven by their focus being on slowing down the run game.
It was obvious as fuck Rutgers chief concern was defending the run game all day long. The passing game worked good enough, but there is still too much fuckery as Roady aptly points out. Could we just retire the toss sweep to McClatcher and the zero net yard fucking bubble screens? We should all expect a double-reverse flea-flicker that goes for 5 yards and injures a key player in game 2 or 3. Smiff is hard as a rock just thinking about it.
Despite the fuckery, UW will win at least 9, because the O has improved enough to execute when they need to. -
Jesus, Mary and Joseph. Puppy's back alright. Peacock proud. Full splendor. Here we go again.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Its Peter's 3rd year. If he goes 9-4 thats a big improvement. A coach shouldnt be judged till his 4th-5th year. Especially a complete overhaul of a program. Been saying for 2 years, anything that happens this year is a bonus and year ahead of schedule.RoadDawg55 said:
I'm a true nega dawg and fully believe we suck until proven otherwise, but I'm not dumb enough to complain about the beat down we put on Rutgers. The team dos what they had to do. We'll find out after the Arizona and Stanford games.Mad_Son said:
TSIO is 100% not the point...TurdBuffer said:Mad Dog TSIO = Too Soon. Drink heavily and relax 'til game #4. Utterly meaningless games 'til then.
Enjoy the rebuilding process. Enjoy the games, the indibidual play. If Pete wins north he'll be consensus pac12 coach of year. And deservedly so.
