Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Depth Chart

124»

Comments

  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,825
    Rule #1 of Team Building: Get the best players into your program as possible through recruiting

    Rule #2 of Team Building: Develop players once they get into the program

    Rule #3 of Team Building: Play your best players

    If you are able to consistently recruit well and develop players, then it becomes the exception and not the rule that the players you recruit in the most current class are in the 2 deeps. If a player isn't in the 2 deeps, then you should make every effort to RS that player if you can.

    Before you point to the Alabama's of the world playing freshman, there's a difference between getting a handful of Top 50 players nationally versus the players that UW is getting. That's not an excuse but it's more just reality not just today, but throughout the history of this program.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Tequilla said:

    Rule #1 of Team Building: Get the best players into your program as possible through recruiting

    Rule #2 of Team Building: Develop players once they get into the program

    Rule #3 of Team Building: Play your best players

    If you are able to consistently recruit well and develop players, then it becomes the exception and not the rule that the players you recruit in the most current class are in the 2 deeps. If a player isn't in the 2 deeps, then you should make every effort to RS that player if you can.

    Before you point to the Alabama's of the world playing freshman, there's a difference between getting a handful of Top 50 players nationally versus the players that UW is getting. That's not an excuse but it's more just reality not just today, but throughout the history of this program.

    If you're resigned to occasionally contending for a division crown in this shit conference, the approach you described is perfect.

    Oregon is doing better than that though. Aren't we supposed to BONEM?
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    AIRWOLF said:

    Tequilla said:

    Rule #1 of Team Building: Get the best players into your program as possible through recruiting

    Rule #2 of Team Building: Develop players once they get into the program

    Rule #3 of Team Building: Play your best players

    If you are able to consistently recruit well and develop players, then it becomes the exception and not the rule that the players you recruit in the most current class are in the 2 deeps. If a player isn't in the 2 deeps, then you should make every effort to RS that player if you can.

    Before you point to the Alabama's of the world playing freshman, there's a difference between getting a handful of Top 50 players nationally versus the players that UW is getting. That's not an excuse but it's more just reality not just today, but throughout the history of this program.

    If you're resigned to occasionally contending for a division crown in this shit conference, the approach you described is perfect.

    Oregon is doing better than that though. Aren't we supposed to BONEM?
    You seem to believe you are very knowledgeable.
    I've been right for 14 years in a row.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Gladstone said:

    AIRWOLF said:

    Tequilla said:

    Rule #1 of Team Building: Get the best players into your program as possible through recruiting

    Rule #2 of Team Building: Develop players once they get into the program

    Rule #3 of Team Building: Play your best players

    If you are able to consistently recruit well and develop players, then it becomes the exception and not the rule that the players you recruit in the most current class are in the 2 deeps. If a player isn't in the 2 deeps, then you should make every effort to RS that player if you can.

    Before you point to the Alabama's of the world playing freshman, there's a difference between getting a handful of Top 50 players nationally versus the players that UW is getting. That's not an excuse but it's more just reality not just today, but throughout the history of this program.

    If you're resigned to occasionally contending for a division crown in this shit conference, the approach you described is perfect.

    Oregon is doing better than that though. Aren't we supposed to BONEM?
    You seem to believe you are very knowledgeable.
    I've been right for 14 years in a row.
    someday you're gonna be wrong and i just hope i'm there to see it
    I hope you come back under a new account when that happens.
  • AtomicDawgAtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,043 Standard Supporter

    Tequilla said:

    godawgst said:

    That DL is SEC size that will be an amazing group to watch.

    Your not running between the tackles on us period end of story. Vea and Gaines are like trying to move fire hydrants off the spot and Qualls will be impossible to stop unless your going to double him. Victor and Keishawn should be have a field day this year.

    Wooching holding the edge will be the 64k question and it will be very obvious to the coaches if he can, as you look at our group of starters on D and he's the answer (until proven otherwise) of "who doesn't belong in this picture". They won't go into the Stanford game with him if there's any doubt.

    Not happy w/ Dotson as #2 back. Hoped Coleman would have grabbed that spot and made it his. I think this means we could see more carries for Chico/Budda/Joyner via fly sweep and action off that.

    WR group a work in progress and Smith's employment next year will be determined by how much he uses them versus what they are capable of. If his intent or gameplan is to throw it to the group more than 70% of the called pass plays he will fuck us the 2-3 series per game that will cost us a game or two. Ideally we throw it 30 times per game max, and minimum of 9 targets have to be to the te's and backs out of the field.

    Jesus I had forgot what it was like to watch a staff be able to manage a roster and red-shirt most of the freshman unless they are to good/talented/ready to play. God dare I say that next year we will be talking about a team with depth and is able to reload from year to year!!!



    If you are redshirting most of your freshmen, you aren't recruiting enough good freshmen.
    Exhibit A of why you stick with one liners versus actual football talk
    It's not 1982 anymore. Look at the teams that are winning natties.

    Redshirting should be focused on the lines for physical development.
    Chronic shoulder injuries rule!!
  • AtomicDawgAtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,043 Standard Supporter
    Tequilla said:

    Rule #1 of Team Building: Get the best players into your program as possible through recruiting

    Rule #2 of Team Building: Develop players once they get into the program

    Rule #3 of Team Building: Play your best players

    If you are able to consistently recruit well and develop players, then it becomes the exception and not the rule that the players you recruit in the most current class are in the 2 deeps. If a player isn't in the 2 deeps, then you should make every effort to RS that player if you can.

    Before you point to the Alabama's of the world playing freshman, there's a difference between getting a handful of Top 50 players nationally versus the players that UW is getting. That's not an excuse but it's more just reality not just today, but throughout the history of this program.

    So you're saying uw should recruit good, coach well and play the best players they have?

    I expect more insight for my $9.95.
  • godawgstgodawgst Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,451 Founders Club

    Tequilla said:

    Rule #1 of Team Building: Get the best players into your program as possible through recruiting

    Rule #2 of Team Building: Develop players once they get into the program

    Rule #3 of Team Building: Play your best players

    If you are able to consistently recruit well and develop players, then it becomes the exception and not the rule that the players you recruit in the most current class are in the 2 deeps. If a player isn't in the 2 deeps, then you should make every effort to RS that player if you can.

    Before you point to the Alabama's of the world playing freshman, there's a difference between getting a handful of Top 50 players nationally versus the players that UW is getting. That's not an excuse but it's more just reality not just today, but throughout the history of this program.

    If you're resigned to occasionally contending for a division crown in this shit conference, the approach you described is perfect.

    Oregon is doing better than that though. Aren't we supposed to BONEM?
    Oregon was doing that when they had an offense no one had seen before, coupled with a coach that they won't have for another 100 years, and a 3 star qb from Hawaii that fit their offense as well as I've ever seen.

    There's about 7 teams in CFB that can recruit like Alabama and we aren't (and never will) be one of them. The route Tequilla lays out is what Peterson (or any coach here) has to use.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    godawgst said:

    Tequilla said:

    Rule #1 of Team Building: Get the best players into your program as possible through recruiting

    Rule #2 of Team Building: Develop players once they get into the program

    Rule #3 of Team Building: Play your best players

    If you are able to consistently recruit well and develop players, then it becomes the exception and not the rule that the players you recruit in the most current class are in the 2 deeps. If a player isn't in the 2 deeps, then you should make every effort to RS that player if you can.

    Before you point to the Alabama's of the world playing freshman, there's a difference between getting a handful of Top 50 players nationally versus the players that UW is getting. That's not an excuse but it's more just reality not just today, but throughout the history of this program.

    If you're resigned to occasionally contending for a division crown in this shit conference, the approach you described is perfect.

    Oregon is doing better than that though. Aren't we supposed to BONEM?
    Oregon was doing that when they had an offense no one had seen before, coupled with a coach that they won't have for another 100 years, and a 3 star qb from Hawaii that fit their offense as well as I've ever seen.

    There's about 7 teams in CFB that can recruit like Alabama and we aren't (and never will) be one of them. The route Tequilla lays out is what Peterson (or any coach here) has to use.
    Peterman isn't a good enough gameday coach to make that plan work.
Sign In or Register to comment.