He's also full of shit. James defeated #4 Michigan in year three. Fucking doogs always try to take away from James accomplishments to passively aggressively defend Sark.
What's Sark's record? I think he has two wins (SC in 09 and Stanford last year). Am I forgetting any? He's 0-4 versus Oregon, with 3 other losses to the Trees. So 2-7?
What's Sark's record? I think he has two wins (SC in 09 and Stanford last year). Am I forgetting any? He's 0-4 versus Oregon, with 3 other losses to the Trees. So 2-7?
He's 3-6 since he got to beat an overranked USC and Oregon State. All three of his wins are at home and his losses have been brutal plunger rapings.
What's Sark's record? I think he has two wins (SC in 09 and Stanford last year). Am I forgetting any? He's 0-4 versus Oregon, with 3 other losses to the Trees. So 2-7?
He's 3-6 since he got to beat an overranked USC and Oregon State. All three of his wins are at home and his losses have been brutal plunger rapings. I couldn't remember if OS was actually top 10 when they played. WAY overranked.
Was Stanford outside the top 10 one of the times we played them?
What's Sark's record? I think he has two wins (SC in 09 and Stanford last year). Am I forgetting any? He's 0-4 versus Oregon, with 3 other losses to the Trees. So 2-7?
He's 3-6 since he got to beat an overranked USC and Oregon State. All three of his wins are at home and his losses have been brutal plunger rapings.
I couldn't remember if OS was actually top 10 when they played. WAY overranked.
Was Stanford outside the top 10 one of the times we played them?
In 2010 when they plunger raped us they were outside the top 10.
Also James going 9-13(the cunt conveniently leaves out bowl games or James would be 12-15) actually isn't that bad considering that is top 10 teams.
So he had a winning percentage of .444 vs top 10 teams in his career while Sark is at .333.
What's Sark's record? I think he has two wins (SC in 09 and Stanford last year). Am I forgetting any? He's 0-4 versus Oregon, with 3 other losses to the Trees. So 2-7?
He's 3-6 since he got to beat an overranked USC and Oregon State. All three of his wins are at home and his losses have been brutal plunger rapings.
I couldn't remember if OS was actually top 10 when they played. WAY overranked.
Was Stanford outside the top 10 one of the times we played them?
In 2010 when they plunger raped us they were outside the top 10.
Also James going 9-13(the cunt conveniently leaves out bowl games or James would be 12-15) actually isn't that bad considering that is top 10 teams.
So he had a winning percentage of .444 vs top 10 teams in his career while Sark is at .333.
Love how dumb fuck doogs think that is the same. Good info, thank you.
What's Sark's record? I think he has two wins (SC in 09 and Stanford last year). Am I forgetting any? He's 0-4 versus Oregon, with 3 other losses to the Trees. So 2-7?
He's 3-6 since he got to beat an overranked USC and Oregon State. All three of his wins are at home and his losses have been brutal plunger rapings.
I couldn't remember if OS was actually top 10 when they played. WAY overranked.
Was Stanford outside the top 10 one of the times we played them?
In 2010 when they plunger raped us they were outside the top 10.
Also James going 9-13(the cunt conveniently leaves out bowl games or James would be 12-15) actually isn't that bad considering that is top 10 teams.
So he had a winning percentage of .444 vs top 10 teams in his career while Sark is at .333.
Love how dumb fuck doogs think that is the same.
Good info, thank you.
Plus, Sark will be 3-8 in 12 days.
Yep so that will put him at .272 winning percentage against top 10 teams which is Lambright fucking awful.
Out of curiosity I looked up our other coaches against top 10 teams.
Lambright was 2-6= .333 Neuheisel was 4-4 = .500 Boobs was 1-4= .250 Ty was 0-9 = .000
So Sark is on the same par as Lambright and is about to be on the same par as Boobs.
I'm assuming you're talking at the time of the game, I think I remember most of these wins. Lambo had the Whammy and 4th and 17 on Fright Night ASU. Neuheisel beat Miami, WSU in 02, and I'm not sure who else was top 10. Oregon in 02? Who am I missing? Boobs beat the Quacks in the Paus game, was that the top 10 win?
Neu obviously beat Erikson's Beavs who finished top 10, but weren't top 10 at the time it was played.
Out of curiosity I looked up our other coaches against top 10 teams.
Lambright was 2-6= .333 Neuheisel was 4-4 = .500 Boobs was 1-4= .250 Ty was 0-9 = .000
So Sark is on the same par as Lambright and is about to be on the same par as Boobs.
I'm assuming you're talking at the time of the game, I think I remember most of these wins. Lambo had the Whammy and 4th and 17 on Fright Night ASU. Neuheisel beat Miami, WSU in 02, and I'm not sure who else was top 10. Oregon in 02? Who am I missing? Boobs beat the Quacks in the Paus game, was that the top 10 win?
Neu obviously beat Erikson's Beavs who finished top 10, but weren't top 10 at the time it was played.
I remember all of Ty's top 10 wins vividly.
These are at the time since we are playing Stanford and Oregon right now. I'm not gifted like Phil Bleenor to know if they'll be top 10 at the end of the year.
Rick's top 10 wins at the time were 2000 vs Miami, 2001 vs Stanford(ROFL), 2001 vs Cougs, 2002 vs Cougs.
Lambo's 2 wins were 1994 vs Miami and 1998 vs ASU(who finished 5-6).
Doogs who were too young to see James coach like to diminish his contributes to passively aggressively pump up whoever the loser coach is at the time.
Most Doogs are 30 and under or at least 50.
The younger ones, especially the ones born in 1986, '87, '88 and so on have no memory of DJ. They probably remember Lambright's shitty last years and Slick Rick, but never really saw a great Husky team except for the overacheiving 2k team. They think 7-5 is normal.
The older Doogs like to bring up things like early 70s struggles, how Sixkiller did great with what he had, how Owens was mean to black players/how their was political unrest on campus and on the team in the late 60s (as if this was unique to Seattle) and the really old Doogs bring up McElheny, Heinrich, how they've had season tix since 1933, but how they hate 7 p.m. starts and that darn band nowadays, and this will be their last yr.
Hhbs and people with similar expectations grew up with winning and don't accept 7-6 every year.
and yes, I realize some of you are 50 + and under 30 so kudos
Comments
HI KIM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
He's 3-6 since he got to beat an overranked USC and Oregon State. All three of his wins are at home and his losses have been brutal plunger rapings.
Was Stanford outside the top 10 one of the times we played them?
Was Stanford outside the top 10 one of the times we played them?
In 2010 when they plunger raped us they were outside the top 10.
Also James going 9-13(the cunt conveniently leaves out bowl games or James would be 12-15) actually isn't that bad considering that is top 10 teams.
So he had a winning percentage of .444 vs top 10 teams in his career while Sark is at .333.
Love how dumb fuck doogs think that is the same.
Also James going 9-13(the cunt conveniently leaves out bowl games or James would be 12-15) actually isn't that bad considering that is top 10 teams.
So he had a winning percentage of .444 vs top 10 teams in his career while Sark is at .333.
Love how dumb fuck doogs think that is the same. Good info, thank you.
Plus, Sark will be 3-8 in 12 days.
Plus, Sark will be 3-8 in 12 days.
Yep so that will put him at .272 winning percentage against top 10 teams which is Lambright fucking awful.
Lambright was 2-6= .333
Neuheisel was 4-4 = .500
Boobs was 1-4= .250
Ty was 0-9 = .000
So Sark is on the same par as Lambright and is about to be on the same par as Boobs.
Neu obviously beat Erikson's Beavs who finished top 10, but weren't top 10 at the time it was played.
I remember all of Ty's top 10 wins vividly.
Rick's top 10 wins at the time were 2000 vs Miami, 2001 vs Stanford(ROFL), 2001 vs Cougs, 2002 vs Cougs.
Lambo's 2 wins were 1994 vs Miami and 1998 vs ASU(who finished 5-6).
The younger ones, especially the ones born in 1986, '87, '88 and so on have no memory of DJ. They probably remember Lambright's shitty last years and Slick Rick, but never really saw a great Husky team except for the overacheiving 2k team. They think 7-5 is normal.
The older Doogs like to bring up things like early 70s struggles, how Sixkiller did great with what he had, how Owens was mean to black players/how their was political unrest on campus and on the team in the late 60s (as if this was unique to Seattle) and the really old Doogs bring up McElheny, Heinrich, how they've had season tix since 1933, but how they hate 7 p.m. starts and that darn band nowadays, and this will be their last yr.
Hhbs and people with similar expectations grew up with winning and don't accept 7-6 every year.
and yes, I realize some of you are 50 + and under 30 so kudos