Sounds better than having to go around to other states looking for a better deal on slaves.
What if you had a free market trading system where you could source your slaves from any state AND you could select the slaves that precisely fit your needs? Abundance.
What if everyone was provided a slave?
It's a basic human right to own a slave.
It can't be a right, because that would require stealing from others to provide the slaves. So by definition, it's not a right. But the pursuit of obtaining a slave is a right.
Stealing? Hardly.
Everyone would pay into the system for our mutual benefit. Just like everything else we do collectively as a nation.
Obviously there are cases of those who cannot pay for their slaves, but they are costing the rest of us already.
Would you deny the majority a great benefit just to spite a small minority? That would be silly and childish.
Let me know when everyone pays into the system for our mutual benefit.
Wait - Football at the military academies is funded by the taxpayers? WTF? Defunding that shit would be a good fucking start.
Following that logic, we should defund all collegiate athletics, starting with track and field.
When you say "defund" you imply that all D1 athletic departments are funded by the taxpayers. That is not the case...and yes, defund all that are funded by the federal government. States can make up their own mind.
Most D1 ADs run at a loss and all D1 schools receive some form of federal funding.
Wait - Football at the military academies is funded by the taxpayers? WTF? Defunding that shit would be a good fucking start.
Following that logic, we should defund all collegiate athletics, starting with track and field.
When you say "defund" you imply that all D1 athletic departments are funded by the taxpayers. That is not the case...and yes, defund all that are funded by the federal government. States can make up their own mind.
Most D1 ADs run at a loss and all D1 schools receive some form of federal funding.
Sounds better than having to go around to other states looking for a better deal on slaves.
What if you had a free market trading system where you could source your slaves from any state AND you could select the slaves that precisely fit your needs? Abundance.
What if everyone was provided a slave?
It's a basic human right to own a slave.
It can't be a right, because that would require stealing from others to provide the slaves. So by definition, it's not a right. But the pursuit of obtaining a slave is a right.
Stealing? Hardly.
Everyone would pay into the system for our mutual benefit. Just like everything else we do collectively as a nation.
Obviously there are cases of those who cannot pay for their slaves, but they are costing the rest of us already.
Would you deny the majority a great benefit just to spite a small minority? That would be silly and childish.
Let me know when everyone pays into the system for our mutual benefit.
Any why does the government have to force people to contribute with the threat of prison? Isn't there millions and millions of people who believe contributing is the right thing to do and would just do it? People like Buffet and Gates sure do.
Sounds better than having to go around to other states looking for a better deal on slaves.
What if you had a free market trading system where you could source your slaves from any state AND you could select the slaves that precisely fit your needs? Abundance.
What if everyone was provided a slave?
It's a basic human right to own a slave.
It can't be a right, because that would require stealing from others to provide the slaves. So by definition, it's not a right. But the pursuit of obtaining a slave is a right.
Stealing? Hardly.
Everyone would pay into the system for our mutual benefit. Just like everything else we do collectively as a nation.
Obviously there are cases of those who cannot pay for their slaves, but they are costing the rest of us already.
Would you deny the majority a great benefit just to spite a small minority? That would be silly and childish.
Let me know when everyone pays into the system for our mutual benefit.
I find your anti-slavery stance appalling and short-sighted.
Sounds better than having to go around to other states looking for a better deal on slaves.
What if you had a free market trading system where you could source your slaves from any state AND you could select the slaves that precisely fit your needs? Abundance.
What if everyone was provided a slave?
It's a basic human right to own a slave.
It can't be a right, because that would require stealing from others to provide the slaves. So by definition, it's not a right. But the pursuit of obtaining a slave is a right.
Stealing? Hardly.
Everyone would pay into the system for our mutual benefit. Just like everything else we do collectively as a nation.
Obviously there are cases of those who cannot pay for their slaves, but they are costing the rest of us already.
Would you deny the majority a great benefit just to spite a small minority? That would be silly and childish.
Let me know when everyone pays into the system for our mutual benefit.
I find your anti-slavery stance appalling and short-sighted.
Sounds better than having to go around to other states looking for a better deal on slaves.
What if you had a free market trading system where you could source your slaves from any state AND you could select the slaves that precisely fit your needs? Abundance.
What if everyone was provided a slave?
It's a basic human right to own a slave.
It can't be a right, because that would require stealing from others to provide the slaves. So by definition, it's not a right. But the pursuit of obtaining a slave is a right.
Stealing? Hardly.
Everyone would pay into the system for our mutual benefit. Just like everything else we do collectively as a nation.
Obviously there are cases of those who cannot pay for their slaves, but they are costing the rest of us already.
Would you deny the majority a great benefit just to spite a small minority? That would be silly and childish.
Let me know when everyone pays into the system for our mutual benefit.
I find your anti-slavery stance appalling and short-sighted.
SMH
I'm for the slaves but against the slave owners.
Disagree. I think you for the slaves AND for the rights of the slave owners to beat the slaves.
Comments
SMH
Abundance.
does that make sense? it does to me.
youtu.be/642UUjTbrnE