CIA labels Trump 'threat to national security'

Sledog

2001400ex said:

Swaye said:

OZONE said:

RaceBannon said:

But unsecured servers aren't an issue

As security experts have proven, there is no proof that the emails would have been more secure if the gov't ran the servers.

You aren't dumb, stop acting like it. Yes, the servers may not have been more secure, but there would have been oversight of them, and breach detection/mitigation if it occurred. Good God. Why do you defend shit you know is so fucking stupid? Just say look, I know what Hillary did was dumb as fuck, and borderline criminal, but I like her better than Trump anyway. Christ.

Yet, after several investigations, there's been zero evidence any breech occurred.

Not defending, pointing out a fact. So don't twist.

The extent of her treasonous actions will never be known. Too embarrassing for the country and Owebama.

OZONE

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Swaye said:

OZONE said:

RaceBannon said:

But unsecured servers aren't an issue

As security experts have proven, there is no proof that the emails would have been more secure if the gov't ran the servers.

You aren't dumb, stop acting like it. Yes, the servers may not have been more secure, but there would have been oversight of them, and breach detection/mitigation if it occurred. Good God. Why do you defend shit you know is so fucking stupid? Just say look, I know what Hillary did was dumb as fuck, and borderline criminal, but I like her better than Trump anyway. Christ.

Yet, after several investigations, there's been zero evidence any breech occurred.

Not defending, pointing out a fact. So don't twist.

The extent of her treasonous actions will never be known. Too embarrassing for the country and Owebama.

A Bush appointee is the one that made the call to not recommend charges.

HTH

TierbsHsotBoobs

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Swaye said:

OZONE said:

RaceBannon said:

But unsecured servers aren't an issue

As security experts have proven, there is no proof that the emails would have been more secure if the gov't ran the servers.

You aren't dumb, stop acting like it. Yes, the servers may not have been more secure, but there would have been oversight of them, and breach detection/mitigation if it occurred. Good God. Why do you defend shit you know is so fucking stupid? Just say look, I know what Hillary did was dumb as fuck, and borderline criminal, but I like her better than Trump anyway. Christ.

Yet, after several investigations, there's been zero evidence any breech occurred.

Not defending, pointing out a fact. So don't twist.

The extent of her treasonous actions will never be known. Too embarrassing for the country and Owebama.

<img src="http://vault-cdn.si.com/SI_ISSUE_IMAGES/Sports%20Illustrated/1965/12/19651206/Sports_Illustrated_43446_19651206-001-2048.jpg" />

ThomasFremont

OZONE said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Swaye said:

OZONE said:

RaceBannon said:

But unsecured servers aren't an issue

As security experts have proven, there is no proof that the emails would have been more secure if the gov't ran the servers.

You aren't dumb, stop acting like it. Yes, the servers may not have been more secure, but there would have been oversight of them, and breach detection/mitigation if it occurred. Good God. Why do you defend shit you know is so fucking stupid? Just say look, I know what Hillary did was dumb as fuck, and borderline criminal, but I like her better than Trump anyway. Christ.

Yet, after several investigations, there's been zero evidence any breech occurred.

Not defending, pointing out a fact. So don't twist.

The extent of her treasonous actions will never be known. Too embarrassing for the country and Owebama.

A Bush appointee is the one that made the call to not recommend charges.

HTH

But HOW is @Sledog a stupid prole?

HoustonHusky

Let's see...the political appointee that started the Benghazi YouTube video lie and now works for a consulting firm supporting Hillary says Hillary is good and Trump is bad. News at 11.

Yet lemmings like OZONE lap this stuff up...

TierbsHsotBoobs

HoustonHusky said:

Let's see...the political appointee that started the Benghazi YouTube video lie and now works for a consulting firm supporting Hillary says Hillary is good and Trump is bad. News at 11.

Yet lemmings like OZONE lap this stuff up...

Fenderbender123

So what you're saying is that we shouldn't take anything the CIA director says seriously when it comes to what is and isn't a national security threat?

OZONE

Fenderbender123 said:

So what you're saying is that we shouldn't take anything the CIA director says seriously when it comes to what is and isn't a national security threat?

You should probably stick to sharing infections with Race.

OZONE

Oh, and here is food for thought.

There are 4 living former presidents. Two (D)s and two (R)s, and a sitting president (D).

They don't agree on everything, but they do agree on one thing... Trump is not fit for the job.

Baseman

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Swaye said:

OZONE said:

RaceBannon said:

But unsecured servers aren't an issue

As security experts have proven, there is no proof that the emails would have been more secure if the gov't ran the servers.

You aren't dumb, stop acting like it. Yes, the servers may not have been more secure, but there would have been oversight of them, and breach detection/mitigation if it occurred. Good God. Why do you defend shit you know is so fucking stupid? Just say look, I know what Hillary did was dumb as fuck, and borderline criminal, but I like her better than Trump anyway. Christ.

Yet, after several investigations, there's been zero evidence any breech occurred.

Not defending, pointing out a fact. So don't twist.

The extent of her treasonous actions will never be known. Too embarrassing for the country and Owebama.