Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

CIA labels Trump 'threat to national security'

OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
in Tug Tavern

http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/05/politics/michael-morell-clinton-endorsement/index.html

1st time in history a candidate has been so bad that the former CIA chief was compelled to denounce him like this.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • AtomicPissAtomicPiss Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 64,471 Founders Club
    OZONE said:


    http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/05/politics/michael-morell-clinton-endorsement/index.html

    1st time in history a candidate has been so bad that the former CIA chief was compelled to denounce him like this.

    I'm sure he was compensated well to issue that statement.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    RaceBannon said:

    But unsecured servers aren't an issue

    As security experts have proven, there is no proof that the emails would have been more secure if the gov't ran the servers.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,416 Standard Supporter
    OZONE said:


    http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/05/politics/michael-morell-clinton-endorsement/index.html

    1st time in history a candidate has been so bad that the former CIA chief was compelled to denounce him like this.

    So a Obamao appointee says Trumps bad. That means Trumps not bad. But you don't get it. Jim Jones is serving Kool Aid drop by for a cup.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    edited August 2016
    Swaye said:

    OZONE said:

    RaceBannon said:

    But unsecured servers aren't an issue

    As security experts have proven, there is no proof that the emails would have been more secure if the gov't ran the servers.
    You aren't dumb, stop acting like it. Yes, the servers may not have been more secure, but there would have been oversight of them, and breach detection/mitigation if it occurred. Good God. Why do you defend shit you know is so fucking stupid? Just say look, I know what Hillary did was dumb as fuck, and borderline criminal, but I like her better than Trump anyway. Christ.
    I've already essentially said this, why do I need to repeat it in every post? I agree she is not a great candidate, and I was in favor of somebody else, but it is time to move forward and choose from the two options, as bad as they both are.

    I'm just having fun pointing out, daily, what an idiot the (R) party chose as their nominee. Regardless of how bad Clinton is, Trump is 1000 times worse, and so bad, that we are making history on a daily basis with people coming out against him. Republicans, government officials, etc.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    DerekJohnson said:

    OZONE said:


    http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/05/politics/michael-morell-clinton-endorsement/index.html

    1st time in history a candidate has been so bad that the former CIA chief was compelled to denounce him like this.

    I'm sure he was compensated well to issue that statement.
    We really need to be able to flag moderators
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BearsWiinBearsWiin Member Posts: 5,034
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    OZONE said:


    http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/05/politics/michael-morell-clinton-endorsement/index.html

    1st time in history a candidate has been so bad that the former CIA chief was compelled to denounce him like this.

    I'm sure he was compensated well to issue that statement.
    We really need to be able to flag moderators
    Yeah, why is he still here?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Swaye said:

    OZONE said:

    RaceBannon said:

    But unsecured servers aren't an issue

    As security experts have proven, there is no proof that the emails would have been more secure if the gov't ran the servers.
    You aren't dumb, stop acting like it. Yes, the servers may not have been more secure, but there would have been oversight of them, and breach detection/mitigation if it occurred. Good God. Why do you defend shit you know is so fucking stupid? Just say look, I know what Hillary did was dumb as fuck, and borderline criminal, but I like her better than Trump anyway. Christ.
    Yet, after several investigations, there's been zero evidence any breech occurred.

    Not defending, pointing out a fact. So don't twist.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,416 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Swaye said:

    OZONE said:

    RaceBannon said:

    But unsecured servers aren't an issue

    As security experts have proven, there is no proof that the emails would have been more secure if the gov't ran the servers.
    You aren't dumb, stop acting like it. Yes, the servers may not have been more secure, but there would have been oversight of them, and breach detection/mitigation if it occurred. Good God. Why do you defend shit you know is so fucking stupid? Just say look, I know what Hillary did was dumb as fuck, and borderline criminal, but I like her better than Trump anyway. Christ.
    Yet, after several investigations, there's been zero evidence any breech occurred.

    Not defending, pointing out a fact. So don't twist.
    The extent of her treasonous actions will never be known. Too embarrassing for the country and Owebama.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Swaye said:

    OZONE said:

    RaceBannon said:

    But unsecured servers aren't an issue

    As security experts have proven, there is no proof that the emails would have been more secure if the gov't ran the servers.
    You aren't dumb, stop acting like it. Yes, the servers may not have been more secure, but there would have been oversight of them, and breach detection/mitigation if it occurred. Good God. Why do you defend shit you know is so fucking stupid? Just say look, I know what Hillary did was dumb as fuck, and borderline criminal, but I like her better than Trump anyway. Christ.
    Yet, after several investigations, there's been zero evidence any breech occurred.

    Not defending, pointing out a fact. So don't twist.
    The extent of her treasonous actions will never be known. Too embarrassing for the country and Owebama.
    A Bush appointee is the one that made the call to not recommend charges.

    HTH
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Swaye said:

    OZONE said:

    RaceBannon said:

    But unsecured servers aren't an issue

    As security experts have proven, there is no proof that the emails would have been more secure if the gov't ran the servers.
    You aren't dumb, stop acting like it. Yes, the servers may not have been more secure, but there would have been oversight of them, and breach detection/mitigation if it occurred. Good God. Why do you defend shit you know is so fucking stupid? Just say look, I know what Hillary did was dumb as fuck, and borderline criminal, but I like her better than Trump anyway. Christ.
    Yet, after several investigations, there's been zero evidence any breech occurred.

    Not defending, pointing out a fact. So don't twist.
    The extent of her treasonous actions will never be known. Too embarrassing for the country and Owebama.
    <img src="http://vault-cdn.si.com/SI_ISSUE_IMAGES/Sports%20Illustrated/1965/12/19651206/Sports_Illustrated_43446_19651206-001-2048.jpg" />
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    OZONE said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Swaye said:

    OZONE said:

    RaceBannon said:

    But unsecured servers aren't an issue

    As security experts have proven, there is no proof that the emails would have been more secure if the gov't ran the servers.
    You aren't dumb, stop acting like it. Yes, the servers may not have been more secure, but there would have been oversight of them, and breach detection/mitigation if it occurred. Good God. Why do you defend shit you know is so fucking stupid? Just say look, I know what Hillary did was dumb as fuck, and borderline criminal, but I like her better than Trump anyway. Christ.
    Yet, after several investigations, there's been zero evidence any breech occurred.

    Not defending, pointing out a fact. So don't twist.
    The extent of her treasonous actions will never be known. Too embarrassing for the country and Owebama.
    A Bush appointee is the one that made the call to not recommend charges.

    HTH
    But HOW is @Sledog a stupid prole?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,993
    Let's see...the political appointee that started the Benghazi YouTube video lie and now works for a consulting firm supporting Hillary says Hillary is good and Trump is bad. News at 11.

    Yet lemmings like OZONE lap this stuff up...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    HoustonHusky said:

    Let's see...the political appointee that started the Benghazi YouTube video lie and now works for a consulting firm supporting Hillary says Hillary is good and Trump is bad. News at 11.

    Yet lemmings like OZONE lap this stuff up...

    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fenderbender123Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,988
    So what you're saying is that we shouldn't take anything the CIA director says seriously when it comes to what is and isn't a national security threat?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    Fenderbender123 said:

    So what you're saying is that we shouldn't take anything the CIA director says seriously when it comes to what is and isn't a national security threat?

    You should probably stick to sharing infections with Race.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    Oh, and here is food for thought.

    There are 4 living former presidents. Two (D)s and two (R)s, and a sitting president (D).

    They don't agree on everything, but they do agree on one thing... Trump is not fit for the job.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BasemanBaseman Member Posts: 12,367
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Swaye said:

    OZONE said:

    RaceBannon said:

    But unsecured servers aren't an issue

    As security experts have proven, there is no proof that the emails would have been more secure if the gov't ran the servers.
    You aren't dumb, stop acting like it. Yes, the servers may not have been more secure, but there would have been oversight of them, and breach detection/mitigation if it occurred. Good God. Why do you defend shit you know is so fucking stupid? Just say look, I know what Hillary did was dumb as fuck, and borderline criminal, but I like her better than Trump anyway. Christ.
    Yet, after several investigations, there's been zero evidence any breech occurred.

    Not defending, pointing out a fact. So don't twist.
    The extent of her treasonous actions will never be known. Too embarrassing for the country and Owebama.
    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.