People forget that anyone running for the GOP would be getting the same treatment
I agree Race, the MSM would be trying to shoot any GOP candidate. The difference is one of the more seasoned types wouldn't be handing them the ammo. Daily. Then again, if you elect Rubio or whatever, it's not as bad as Clinton (re: SCOTUS), but other than that it is pretty much the same. In short, we're fucked.
Clinton News Network poll on Clinton. Unbiased I'm sure.
I am voting for Trump. That said, you'd have to be sort of blind to not see that unless some huge unforced errors occur with Hillary, she is going to win, and win big. And fuck, she has already survived the e-mail scandal, Benghazi, and the leaked DNC e-mails re: Bernie. She's teflon. It's over.
Like I've said before, The Dems essentially punted on this election. They knew they had to run Hillary at some point just to make her go away. A marginally good candidate would have already wiped the floor with Hillary.
The GOP fumbled the punt and are currently kicking it backwards towards their end zone.
Tend to agree. No crystal ball or anything, but I am guessing a moderate establishment type like Rubio or Kasich would be crushing her. But, everyone wanted to throw a fit this year and show DC how much they hate them. Well, I support that vitriol and hate DC as much as anyone, but look what we got for it. Hillary. Fuck.
I do find it odd that all the shit Trump talked and gaffes he had through the primary season caused his numbers to go up, but since the general kicked off it has been the opposite. The swagger and bombastic tirades are no longer working. I like that he is a non-scripted dude and not owned by anyone (yet), but he is just so far off message and the message he has is so muddled that the GOP is literally going to lose the election to the worst candidate the Dems have run in a generation.
You actually have to try to lose to someone with the off the chart negatives of Hillary. How do you do that? Run the one guy in America with worse negatives. I want to kick something.
As I have been saying for months, minorities vote in the general election.
Clinton News Network poll on Clinton. Unbiased I'm sure.
I am voting for Trump. That said, you'd have to be sort of blind to not see that unless some huge unforced errors occur with Hillary, she is going to win, and win big. And fuck, she has already survived the e-mail scandal, Benghazi, and the leaked DNC e-mails re: Bernie. She's teflon. It's over.
Like I've said before, The Dems essentially punted on this election. They knew they had to run Hillary at some point just to make her go away. A marginally good candidate would have already wiped the floor with Hillary.
The GOP fumbled the punt and are currently kicking it backwards towards their end zone.
Tend to agree. No crystal ball or anything, but I am guessing a moderate establishment type like Rubio or Kasich would be crushing her. But, everyone wanted to throw a fit this year and show DC how much they hate them. Well, I support that vitriol and hate DC as much as anyone, but look what we got for it. Hillary. Fuck.
I do find it odd that all the shit Trump talked and gaffes he had through the primary season caused his numbers to go up, but since the general kicked off it has been the opposite. The swagger and bombastic tirades are no longer working. I like that he is a non-scripted dude and not owned by anyone (yet), but he is just so far off message and the message he has is so muddled that the GOP is literally going to lose the election to the worst candidate the Dems have run in a generation.
You actually have to try to lose to someone with the off the chart negatives of Hillary. How do you do that? Run the one guy in America with worse negatives. I want to kick something.
As I have been saying for months, minorities vote in the general election.
ISAFNRC
Yeah, it's almost like the GOP primaries voting block is not the same as the general election voting block
People forget that anyone running for the GOP would be getting the same treatment
I agree Race, the MSM would be trying to shoot any GOP candidate. The difference is one of the more seasoned types wouldn't be handing them the ammo. Daily. Then again, if you elect Rubio or whatever, it's not as bad as Clinton (re: SCOTUS), but other than that it is pretty much the same. In short, we're fucked.
#SMOD2016
Romney was about as inoffensive and bland as it gets
Also interesting is that Hillary is poling 7% above Trump among whites with an education. A democrat hasn't won that voting group in forever. The only demographic Trump leads in is whites with a high school education or less.
People forget that anyone running for the GOP would be getting the same treatment
I agree Race, the MSM would be trying to shoot any GOP candidate. The difference is one of the more seasoned types wouldn't be handing them the ammo. Daily. Then again, if you elect Rubio or whatever, it's not as bad as Clinton (re: SCOTUS), but other than that it is pretty much the same. In short, we're fucked.
#SMOD2016
Romney was about as inoffensive and bland as it gets
47%!!#####!#!!!!!1111
He was running against Obama.
He would have beaten Hillary rather easily, say 34-17?
Also interesting is that Hillary is poling 7% above Trump among whites with an education. A democrat hasn't won that voting group in forever. The only demographic Trump leads in is poor white trash.
People forget that anyone running for the GOP would be getting the same treatment
I agree Race, the MSM would be trying to shoot any GOP candidate. The difference is one of the more seasoned types wouldn't be handing them the ammo. Daily. Then again, if you elect Rubio or whatever, it's not as bad as Clinton (re: SCOTUS), but other than that it is pretty much the same. In short, we're fucked.
#SMOD2016
Romney was about as inoffensive and bland as it gets
47%!!#####!#!!!!!1111
He was running against Obama.
He would have beaten Hillary rather easily, say 34-17?
Comments
http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/08/03/watch-hillary-says-were-going-raise-taxes-middle-class
#SMOD2016
You're struggling again
But I still love you
(Seriously, he makes a good point about looking at primary reform too)
(Rules determine outcomes)
Disagree
Skeptical
ISAFNRC
No
Yes
Craves it
47%!!#####!#!!!!!1111
The GOP would not be criticizing and abandoning a sane GOP candidate the way the GOP is criticizing and abandoning Trump.
He would have beaten Hillary rather easily, say 34-17?
He'd be getting the same treatment
Just imagine if interest rates were allowed to be set organically and we quit printing money.
I'm sure the economy would be just boffo at that point.