Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Dorsey sells couch
Comments
-
I agree with the larger point I just think we?re better off without Dorsey. Thybulle, Dickerson, Green, Crisp, Durrussea (sp?) have a shot at being those four year, veteran guys. Maybe Timmons too? Keeping and developing them will be crucial.FreeChavez said:
I think a lot of people are losing the point in the Dorsey. I'm not advocating Dorsey. I never bought he was a uw level player from day 1. The only person who liked Dorsey was Aaron beach who I'm pretty sure had his dick in his mouth while typing.dnc said:
Greens actually an athlete who you can imagine being a solid defender and running the break one day. Dorsey is slow, unathletic and not in very good shape. Maybe he'd be something if he lost 30 pounds, but probably not.NEsnake12 said:
When recruits don't pan out there's no reason to keep them on the roster while they waste a scholarship. Dorsey had 2 years and he didn't prove any real worth to the team, all he could do was shoot 3s (and at average level at best). At least the other mediocre freshman wing Green has some versatility to his offensive game and has a room to improve overall, while I could never fathom Dorsey's having a remotely high ceiling. If they don't really have any visible path to being legitimately good players by their senior year, then sell their couch and move on.FreeChavez said:
So another upper class man thrown to the waste basket leaving all of two players older than soph.NEsnake12 said:
I'm not saying Dorsey should stay, but this constant revolving door of role players is exactly why uw can't make ncaas.
Vets provide early perspective as well as a great push when the freshman wall hits. But Romar must not believe in any of that
My point is that Rosters need depth for a lot of reasons and uw has NEVER been successful with elite frosh as the primary players. How many on here constantly bitch about ncaa vs nba. The idea is to build a program and Romar has failed in so many areas including building a team which fosters certain skills. I hate the zags but they find ways to take shit players and get 10 good minutes. Dorsey may not be the hill to die on but it's just another example of how we(?) lose players as they can become role players.
a lot of people out here assume talent is all that matters and team/vets don't matter. I would argue differently. Uw has become the program many Romar apologists argued against. It's uk lite. Lots of frosh/soph without results, and tons of transfers for guys who don't work right away. It's a pathetic attempt by Romar to keep his job and have people stay engaged in recruits. Teams needs a combo of vets and frosh elite talent to sustain success. Dorsey is just another body in a long line of players who could have helped down the line more than shitty jc transfers brought in with last minute scholarships. -
If one or more of these sophomores don't play significant minutes or develop a roll that they can buy into then I would expect a few of these guys departing before they become that experienced depth that we? would all like to see. The Porters and Nowells of the world don't come in to play school and with Romar they never will. Wash, Rinse, Fuck it.dnc said:
I agree with the larger point I just think we?re better off without Dorsey. Thybulle, Dickerson, Green, Crisp, Durrussea (sp?) have a shot at being those four year, veteran guys. Maybe Timmons too? Keeping and developing them will be crucial.FreeChavez said:
I think a lot of people are losing the point in the Dorsey. I'm not advocating Dorsey. I never bought he was a uw level player from day 1. The only person who liked Dorsey was Aaron beach who I'm pretty sure had his dick in his mouth while typing.dnc said:
Greens actually an athlete who you can imagine being a solid defender and running the break one day. Dorsey is slow, unathletic and not in very good shape. Maybe he'd be something if he lost 30 pounds, but probably not.NEsnake12 said:
When recruits don't pan out there's no reason to keep them on the roster while they waste a scholarship. Dorsey had 2 years and he didn't prove any real worth to the team, all he could do was shoot 3s (and at average level at best). At least the other mediocre freshman wing Green has some versatility to his offensive game and has a room to improve overall, while I could never fathom Dorsey's having a remotely high ceiling. If they don't really have any visible path to being legitimately good players by their senior year, then sell their couch and move on.FreeChavez said:
So another upper class man thrown to the waste basket leaving all of two players older than soph.NEsnake12 said:
I'm not saying Dorsey should stay, but this constant revolving door of role players is exactly why uw can't make ncaas.
Vets provide early perspective as well as a great push when the freshman wall hits. But Romar must not believe in any of that
My point is that Rosters need depth for a lot of reasons and uw has NEVER been successful with elite frosh as the primary players. How many on here constantly bitch about ncaa vs nba. The idea is to build a program and Romar has failed in so many areas including building a team which fosters certain skills. I hate the zags but they find ways to take shit players and get 10 good minutes. Dorsey may not be the hill to die on but it's just another example of how we(?) lose players as they can become role players.
a lot of people out here assume talent is all that matters and team/vets don't matter. I would argue differently. Uw has become the program many Romar apologists argued against. It's uk lite. Lots of frosh/soph without results, and tons of transfers for guys who don't work right away. It's a pathetic attempt by Romar to keep his job and have people stay engaged in recruits. Teams needs a combo of vets and frosh elite talent to sustain success. Dorsey is just another body in a long line of players who could have helped down the line more than shitty jc transfers brought in with last minute scholarships. -
Thybulle started last year and I would imagine Dickerson starts this year so those two should be fine for minutes/roll.theknowledge said:
If one or more of these sophomores don't play significant minutes or develop a roll that they can buy into then I would expect a few of these guys departing before they become that experienced depth that we? would all like to see. The Porters and Nowells of the world don't come in to play school and with Romar they never will. Wash, Rinse, Fuck it.dnc said:
I agree with the larger point I just think we?re better off without Dorsey. Thybulle, Dickerson, Green, Crisp, Durrussea (sp?) have a shot at being those four year, veteran guys. Maybe Timmons too? Keeping and developing them will be crucial.FreeChavez said:
I think a lot of people are losing the point in the Dorsey. I'm not advocating Dorsey. I never bought he was a uw level player from day 1. The only person who liked Dorsey was Aaron beach who I'm pretty sure had his dick in his mouth while typing.dnc said:
Greens actually an athlete who you can imagine being a solid defender and running the break one day. Dorsey is slow, unathletic and not in very good shape. Maybe he'd be something if he lost 30 pounds, but probably not.NEsnake12 said:
When recruits don't pan out there's no reason to keep them on the roster while they waste a scholarship. Dorsey had 2 years and he didn't prove any real worth to the team, all he could do was shoot 3s (and at average level at best). At least the other mediocre freshman wing Green has some versatility to his offensive game and has a room to improve overall, while I could never fathom Dorsey's having a remotely high ceiling. If they don't really have any visible path to being legitimately good players by their senior year, then sell their couch and move on.FreeChavez said:
So another upper class man thrown to the waste basket leaving all of two players older than soph.NEsnake12 said:
I'm not saying Dorsey should stay, but this constant revolving door of role players is exactly why uw can't make ncaas.
Vets provide early perspective as well as a great push when the freshman wall hits. But Romar must not believe in any of that
My point is that Rosters need depth for a lot of reasons and uw has NEVER been successful with elite frosh as the primary players. How many on here constantly bitch about ncaa vs nba. The idea is to build a program and Romar has failed in so many areas including building a team which fosters certain skills. I hate the zags but they find ways to take shit players and get 10 good minutes. Dorsey may not be the hill to die on but it's just another example of how we(?) lose players as they can become role players.
a lot of people out here assume talent is all that matters and team/vets don't matter. I would argue differently. Uw has become the program many Romar apologists argued against. It's uk lite. Lots of frosh/soph without results, and tons of transfers for guys who don't work right away. It's a pathetic attempt by Romar to keep his job and have people stay engaged in recruits. Teams needs a combo of vets and frosh elite talent to sustain success. Dorsey is just another body in a long line of players who could have helped down the line more than shitty jc transfers brought in with last minute scholarships.
Fultz
?
Thybulle
Dickerson
Dime/Timmons
That second ball handler or is the tough spot to project. I hope it's not Crisp but not sure who else it could be. Green? One of the other unheralded frosh?
I really have no idea who gets that spot. -
It's weird that this will be one of the deepest front courts of any Romar team ever (assuming Atewe and Timmins are any good), but we? don't have a sure starting guard beyond Fultz.dnc said:
Thybulle started last year and I would imagine Dickerson starts this year so those two should be fine for minutes/roll.theknowledge said:
If one or more of these sophomores don't play significant minutes or develop a roll that they can buy into then I would expect a few of these guys departing before they become that experienced depth that we? would all like to see. The Porters and Nowells of the world don't come in to play school and with Romar they never will. Wash, Rinse, Fuck it.dnc said:
I agree with the larger point I just think we?re better off without Dorsey. Thybulle, Dickerson, Green, Crisp, Durrussea (sp?) have a shot at being those four year, veteran guys. Maybe Timmons too? Keeping and developing them will be crucial.FreeChavez said:
I think a lot of people are losing the point in the Dorsey. I'm not advocating Dorsey. I never bought he was a uw level player from day 1. The only person who liked Dorsey was Aaron beach who I'm pretty sure had his dick in his mouth while typing.dnc said:
Greens actually an athlete who you can imagine being a solid defender and running the break one day. Dorsey is slow, unathletic and not in very good shape. Maybe he'd be something if he lost 30 pounds, but probably not.NEsnake12 said:
When recruits don't pan out there's no reason to keep them on the roster while they waste a scholarship. Dorsey had 2 years and he didn't prove any real worth to the team, all he could do was shoot 3s (and at average level at best). At least the other mediocre freshman wing Green has some versatility to his offensive game and has a room to improve overall, while I could never fathom Dorsey's having a remotely high ceiling. If they don't really have any visible path to being legitimately good players by their senior year, then sell their couch and move on.FreeChavez said:
So another upper class man thrown to the waste basket leaving all of two players older than soph.NEsnake12 said:
I'm not saying Dorsey should stay, but this constant revolving door of role players is exactly why uw can't make ncaas.
Vets provide early perspective as well as a great push when the freshman wall hits. But Romar must not believe in any of that
My point is that Rosters need depth for a lot of reasons and uw has NEVER been successful with elite frosh as the primary players. How many on here constantly bitch about ncaa vs nba. The idea is to build a program and Romar has failed in so many areas including building a team which fosters certain skills. I hate the zags but they find ways to take shit players and get 10 good minutes. Dorsey may not be the hill to die on but it's just another example of how we(?) lose players as they can become role players.
a lot of people out here assume talent is all that matters and team/vets don't matter. I would argue differently. Uw has become the program many Romar apologists argued against. It's uk lite. Lots of frosh/soph without results, and tons of transfers for guys who don't work right away. It's a pathetic attempt by Romar to keep his job and have people stay engaged in recruits. Teams needs a combo of vets and frosh elite talent to sustain success. Dorsey is just another body in a long line of players who could have helped down the line more than shitty jc transfers brought in with last minute scholarships.
Fultz
?
Thybulle
Dickerson
Dime/Timmons
That second ball handler or is the tough spot to project. I hope it's not Crisp but not sure who else it could be. Green? One of the other unheralded frosh?
I really have no idea who gets that spot.
I don't know anything about Carlos Johnson or Bitumba Baruti (dafuq?), but I doubt they're better than Green and Crisp. I assume Fultz will have the ball in his hands a LOT, so I think that other spot goes to the guard that plays defense and hits open shots. Which is exactly why Thybulle has the 3 spot on lockdown.
My guess is it will be Green. He showed the best shooting stroke and his length gives him an edge on defense. Crisp can be a energy 6th man a la Venoy Big Pimpin Overton. -
In the half court, having Green start at the 2 is infinitely better. But I expect Romar to start Crisp because he likes to have at least 2 capable ball handlers on the floor to break presses and run fast breaks. Green and Thybulle just aren't good enough ballhandlers yet, unless they made significant strides in he offseason.ThomasFremont said:
It's weird that this will be one of the deepest front courts of any Romar team ever (assuming Atewe and Timmins are any good), but we? don't have a sure starting guard beyond Fultz.dnc said:
Thybulle started last year and I would imagine Dickerson starts this year so those two should be fine for minutes/roll.theknowledge said:
If one or more of these sophomores don't play significant minutes or develop a roll that they can buy into then I would expect a few of these guys departing before they become that experienced depth that we? would all like to see. The Porters and Nowells of the world don't come in to play school and with Romar they never will. Wash, Rinse, Fuck it.dnc said:
I agree with the larger point I just think we?re better off without Dorsey. Thybulle, Dickerson, Green, Crisp, Durrussea (sp?) have a shot at being those four year, veteran guys. Maybe Timmons too? Keeping and developing them will be crucial.FreeChavez said:
I think a lot of people are losing the point in the Dorsey. I'm not advocating Dorsey. I never bought he was a uw level player from day 1. The only person who liked Dorsey was Aaron beach who I'm pretty sure had his dick in his mouth while typing.dnc said:
Greens actually an athlete who you can imagine being a solid defender and running the break one day. Dorsey is slow, unathletic and not in very good shape. Maybe he'd be something if he lost 30 pounds, but probably not.NEsnake12 said:
When recruits don't pan out there's no reason to keep them on the roster while they waste a scholarship. Dorsey had 2 years and he didn't prove any real worth to the team, all he could do was shoot 3s (and at average level at best). At least the other mediocre freshman wing Green has some versatility to his offensive game and has a room to improve overall, while I could never fathom Dorsey's having a remotely high ceiling. If they don't really have any visible path to being legitimately good players by their senior year, then sell their couch and move on.FreeChavez said:
So another upper class man thrown to the waste basket leaving all of two players older than soph.NEsnake12 said:
I'm not saying Dorsey should stay, but this constant revolving door of role players is exactly why uw can't make ncaas.
Vets provide early perspective as well as a great push when the freshman wall hits. But Romar must not believe in any of that
My point is that Rosters need depth for a lot of reasons and uw has NEVER been successful with elite frosh as the primary players. How many on here constantly bitch about ncaa vs nba. The idea is to build a program and Romar has failed in so many areas including building a team which fosters certain skills. I hate the zags but they find ways to take shit players and get 10 good minutes. Dorsey may not be the hill to die on but it's just another example of how we(?) lose players as they can become role players.
a lot of people out here assume talent is all that matters and team/vets don't matter. I would argue differently. Uw has become the program many Romar apologists argued against. It's uk lite. Lots of frosh/soph without results, and tons of transfers for guys who don't work right away. It's a pathetic attempt by Romar to keep his job and have people stay engaged in recruits. Teams needs a combo of vets and frosh elite talent to sustain success. Dorsey is just another body in a long line of players who could have helped down the line more than shitty jc transfers brought in with last minute scholarships.
Fultz
?
Thybulle
Dickerson
Dime/Timmons
That second ball handler or is the tough spot to project. I hope it's not Crisp but not sure who else it could be. Green? One of the other unheralded frosh?
I really have no idea who gets that spot.
I don't know anything about Carlos Johnson or Bitumba Baruti (dafuq?), but I doubt they're better than Green and Crisp. I assume Fultz will have the ball in his hands a LOT, so I think that other spot goes to the guard that plays defense and hits open shots. Which is exactly why Thybulle has the 3 spot on lockdown.
My guess is it will be Green. He showed the best shooting stroke and his length gives him an edge on defense. Crisp can be a energy 6th man a la Venoy Big Pimpin Overton.
Fultz will probably play ridiculous minutes because he's gonna have to facilitate the entire offense. And let's hope the late addition guards don't suck, so that Crisp doesn't have to play big minutes too. -
People care about the upcoming season that is already over?NEsnake12 said:
In the half court, having Green start at the 2 is infinitely better. But I expect Romar to start Crisp because he likes to have at least 2 capable ball handlers on the floor to break presses and run fast breaks. Green and Thybulle just aren't good enough ballhandlers yet, unless they made significant strides in he offseason.ThomasFremont said:
It's weird that this will be one of the deepest front courts of any Romar team ever (assuming Atewe and Timmins are any good), but we? don't have a sure starting guard beyond Fultz.dnc said:
Thybulle started last year and I would imagine Dickerson starts this year so those two should be fine for minutes/roll.theknowledge said:
If one or more of these sophomores don't play significant minutes or develop a roll that they can buy into then I would expect a few of these guys departing before they become that experienced depth that we? would all like to see. The Porters and Nowells of the world don't come in to play school and with Romar they never will. Wash, Rinse, Fuck it.dnc said:
I agree with the larger point I just think we?re better off without Dorsey. Thybulle, Dickerson, Green, Crisp, Durrussea (sp?) have a shot at being those four year, veteran guys. Maybe Timmons too? Keeping and developing them will be crucial.FreeChavez said:
I think a lot of people are losing the point in the Dorsey. I'm not advocating Dorsey. I never bought he was a uw level player from day 1. The only person who liked Dorsey was Aaron beach who I'm pretty sure had his dick in his mouth while typing.dnc said:
Greens actually an athlete who you can imagine being a solid defender and running the break one day. Dorsey is slow, unathletic and not in very good shape. Maybe he'd be something if he lost 30 pounds, but probably not.NEsnake12 said:
When recruits don't pan out there's no reason to keep them on the roster while they waste a scholarship. Dorsey had 2 years and he didn't prove any real worth to the team, all he could do was shoot 3s (and at average level at best). At least the other mediocre freshman wing Green has some versatility to his offensive game and has a room to improve overall, while I could never fathom Dorsey's having a remotely high ceiling. If they don't really have any visible path to being legitimately good players by their senior year, then sell their couch and move on.FreeChavez said:
So another upper class man thrown to the waste basket leaving all of two players older than soph.NEsnake12 said:
I'm not saying Dorsey should stay, but this constant revolving door of role players is exactly why uw can't make ncaas.
Vets provide early perspective as well as a great push when the freshman wall hits. But Romar must not believe in any of that
My point is that Rosters need depth for a lot of reasons and uw has NEVER been successful with elite frosh as the primary players. How many on here constantly bitch about ncaa vs nba. The idea is to build a program and Romar has failed in so many areas including building a team which fosters certain skills. I hate the zags but they find ways to take shit players and get 10 good minutes. Dorsey may not be the hill to die on but it's just another example of how we(?) lose players as they can become role players.
a lot of people out here assume talent is all that matters and team/vets don't matter. I would argue differently. Uw has become the program many Romar apologists argued against. It's uk lite. Lots of frosh/soph without results, and tons of transfers for guys who don't work right away. It's a pathetic attempt by Romar to keep his job and have people stay engaged in recruits. Teams needs a combo of vets and frosh elite talent to sustain success. Dorsey is just another body in a long line of players who could have helped down the line more than shitty jc transfers brought in with last minute scholarships.
Fultz
?
Thybulle
Dickerson
Dime/Timmons
That second ball handler or is the tough spot to project. I hope it's not Crisp but not sure who else it could be. Green? One of the other unheralded frosh?
I really have no idea who gets that spot.
I don't know anything about Carlos Johnson or Bitumba Baruti (dafuq?), but I doubt they're better than Green and Crisp. I assume Fultz will have the ball in his hands a LOT, so I think that other spot goes to the guard that plays defense and hits open shots. Which is exactly why Thybulle has the 3 spot on lockdown.
My guess is it will be Green. He showed the best shooting stroke and his length gives him an edge on defense. Crisp can be a energy 6th man a la Venoy Big Pimpin Overton.
Fultz will probably play ridiculous minutes because he's gonna have to facilitate the entire offense. And let's hope the late addition guards don't suck, so that Crisp doesn't have to play big minutes too. -
TierbsHsotBoobs said:
People care about the upcoming season that is already over?NEsnake12 said:
In the half court, having Green start at the 2 is infinitely better. But I expect Romar to start Crisp because he likes to have at least 2 capable ball handlers on the floor to break presses and run fast breaks. Green and Thybulle just aren't good enough ballhandlers yet, unless they made significant strides in he offseason.ThomasFremont said:
It's weird that this will be one of the deepest front courts of any Romar team ever (assuming Atewe and Timmins are any good), but we? don't have a sure starting guard beyond Fultz.dnc said:
Thybulle started last year and I would imagine Dickerson starts this year so those two should be fine for minutes/roll.theknowledge said:
If one or more of these sophomores don't play significant minutes or develop a roll that they can buy into then I would expect a few of these guys departing before they become that experienced depth that we? would all like to see. The Porters and Nowells of the world don't come in to play school and with Romar they never will. Wash, Rinse, Fuck it.dnc said:
I agree with the larger point I just think we?re better off without Dorsey. Thybulle, Dickerson, Green, Crisp, Durrussea (sp?) have a shot at being those four year, veteran guys. Maybe Timmons too? Keeping and developing them will be crucial.FreeChavez said:
I think a lot of people are losing the point in the Dorsey. I'm not advocating Dorsey. I never bought he was a uw level player from day 1. The only person who liked Dorsey was Aaron beach who I'm pretty sure had his dick in his mouth while typing.dnc said:
Greens actually an athlete who you can imagine being a solid defender and running the break one day. Dorsey is slow, unathletic and not in very good shape. Maybe he'd be something if he lost 30 pounds, but probably not.NEsnake12 said:
When recruits don't pan out there's no reason to keep them on the roster while they waste a scholarship. Dorsey had 2 years and he didn't prove any real worth to the team, all he could do was shoot 3s (and at average level at best). At least the other mediocre freshman wing Green has some versatility to his offensive game and has a room to improve overall, while I could never fathom Dorsey's having a remotely high ceiling. If they don't really have any visible path to being legitimately good players by their senior year, then sell their couch and move on.FreeChavez said:
So another upper class man thrown to the waste basket leaving all of two players older than soph.NEsnake12 said:
I'm not saying Dorsey should stay, but this constant revolving door of role players is exactly why uw can't make ncaas.
Vets provide early perspective as well as a great push when the freshman wall hits. But Romar must not believe in any of that
My point is that Rosters need depth for a lot of reasons and uw has NEVER been successful with elite frosh as the primary players. How many on here constantly bitch about ncaa vs nba. The idea is to build a program and Romar has failed in so many areas including building a team which fosters certain skills. I hate the zags but they find ways to take shit players and get 10 good minutes. Dorsey may not be the hill to die on but it's just another example of how we(?) lose players as they can become role players.
a lot of people out here assume talent is all that matters and team/vets don't matter. I would argue differently. Uw has become the program many Romar apologists argued against. It's uk lite. Lots of frosh/soph without results, and tons of transfers for guys who don't work right away. It's a pathetic attempt by Romar to keep his job and have people stay engaged in recruits. Teams needs a combo of vets and frosh elite talent to sustain success. Dorsey is just another body in a long line of players who could have helped down the line more than shitty jc transfers brought in with last minute scholarships.
Fultz
?
Thybulle
Dickerson
Dime/Timmons
That second ball handler or is the tough spot to project. I hope it's not Crisp but not sure who else it could be. Green? One of the other unheralded frosh?
I really have no idea who gets that spot.
I don't know anything about Carlos Johnson or Bitumba Baruti (dafuq?), but I doubt they're better than Green and Crisp. I assume Fultz will have the ball in his hands a LOT, so I think that other spot goes to the guard that plays defense and hits open shots. Which is exactly why Thybulle has the 3 spot on lockdown.
My guess is it will be Green. He showed the best shooting stroke and his length gives him an edge on defense. Crisp can be a energy 6th man a la Venoy Big Pimpin Overton.
Fultz will probably play ridiculous minutes because he's gonna have to facilitate the entire offense. And let's hope the late addition guards don't suck, so that Crisp doesn't have to play big minutes too.
-
I'm amazed and impressed that people still care this muchTierbsHsotBoobs said:
People care about the upcoming season that is already over?NEsnake12 said:
In the half court, having Green start at the 2 is infinitely better. But I expect Romar to start Crisp because he likes to have at least 2 capable ball handlers on the floor to break presses and run fast breaks. Green and Thybulle just aren't good enough ballhandlers yet, unless they made significant strides in he offseason.ThomasFremont said:
It's weird that this will be one of the deepest front courts of any Romar team ever (assuming Atewe and Timmins are any good), but we? don't have a sure starting guard beyond Fultz.dnc said:
Thybulle started last year and I would imagine Dickerson starts this year so those two should be fine for minutes/roll.theknowledge said:
If one or more of these sophomores don't play significant minutes or develop a roll that they can buy into then I would expect a few of these guys departing before they become that experienced depth that we? would all like to see. The Porters and Nowells of the world don't come in to play school and with Romar they never will. Wash, Rinse, Fuck it.dnc said:
I agree with the larger point I just think we?re better off without Dorsey. Thybulle, Dickerson, Green, Crisp, Durrussea (sp?) have a shot at being those four year, veteran guys. Maybe Timmons too? Keeping and developing them will be crucial.FreeChavez said:
I think a lot of people are losing the point in the Dorsey. I'm not advocating Dorsey. I never bought he was a uw level player from day 1. The only person who liked Dorsey was Aaron beach who I'm pretty sure had his dick in his mouth while typing.dnc said:
Greens actually an athlete who you can imagine being a solid defender and running the break one day. Dorsey is slow, unathletic and not in very good shape. Maybe he'd be something if he lost 30 pounds, but probably not.NEsnake12 said:
When recruits don't pan out there's no reason to keep them on the roster while they waste a scholarship. Dorsey had 2 years and he didn't prove any real worth to the team, all he could do was shoot 3s (and at average level at best). At least the other mediocre freshman wing Green has some versatility to his offensive game and has a room to improve overall, while I could never fathom Dorsey's having a remotely high ceiling. If they don't really have any visible path to being legitimately good players by their senior year, then sell their couch and move on.FreeChavez said:
So another upper class man thrown to the waste basket leaving all of two players older than soph.NEsnake12 said:
I'm not saying Dorsey should stay, but this constant revolving door of role players is exactly why uw can't make ncaas.
Vets provide early perspective as well as a great push when the freshman wall hits. But Romar must not believe in any of that
My point is that Rosters need depth for a lot of reasons and uw has NEVER been successful with elite frosh as the primary players. How many on here constantly bitch about ncaa vs nba. The idea is to build a program and Romar has failed in so many areas including building a team which fosters certain skills. I hate the zags but they find ways to take shit players and get 10 good minutes. Dorsey may not be the hill to die on but it's just another example of how we(?) lose players as they can become role players.
a lot of people out here assume talent is all that matters and team/vets don't matter. I would argue differently. Uw has become the program many Romar apologists argued against. It's uk lite. Lots of frosh/soph without results, and tons of transfers for guys who don't work right away. It's a pathetic attempt by Romar to keep his job and have people stay engaged in recruits. Teams needs a combo of vets and frosh elite talent to sustain success. Dorsey is just another body in a long line of players who could have helped down the line more than shitty jc transfers brought in with last minute scholarships.
Fultz
?
Thybulle
Dickerson
Dime/Timmons
That second ball handler or is the tough spot to project. I hope it's not Crisp but not sure who else it could be. Green? One of the other unheralded frosh?
I really have no idea who gets that spot.
I don't know anything about Carlos Johnson or Bitumba Baruti (dafuq?), but I doubt they're better than Green and Crisp. I assume Fultz will have the ball in his hands a LOT, so I think that other spot goes to the guard that plays defense and hits open shots. Which is exactly why Thybulle has the 3 spot on lockdown.
My guess is it will be Green. He showed the best shooting stroke and his length gives him an edge on defense. Crisp can be a energy 6th man a la Venoy Big Pimpin Overton.
Fultz will probably play ridiculous minutes because he's gonna have to facilitate the entire offense. And let's hope the late addition guards don't suck, so that Crisp doesn't have to play big minutes too. -
What do you expect from the same guys that have stuck with the last 15 years of Husky football?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
People care about the upcoming season that is already over?NEsnake12 said:
In the half court, having Green start at the 2 is infinitely better. But I expect Romar to start Crisp because he likes to have at least 2 capable ball handlers on the floor to break presses and run fast breaks. Green and Thybulle just aren't good enough ballhandlers yet, unless they made significant strides in he offseason.ThomasFremont said:
It's weird that this will be one of the deepest front courts of any Romar team ever (assuming Atewe and Timmins are any good), but we? don't have a sure starting guard beyond Fultz.dnc said:
Thybulle started last year and I would imagine Dickerson starts this year so those two should be fine for minutes/roll.theknowledge said:
If one or more of these sophomores don't play significant minutes or develop a roll that they can buy into then I would expect a few of these guys departing before they become that experienced depth that we? would all like to see. The Porters and Nowells of the world don't come in to play school and with Romar they never will. Wash, Rinse, Fuck it.dnc said:
I agree with the larger point I just think we?re better off without Dorsey. Thybulle, Dickerson, Green, Crisp, Durrussea (sp?) have a shot at being those four year, veteran guys. Maybe Timmons too? Keeping and developing them will be crucial.FreeChavez said:
I think a lot of people are losing the point in the Dorsey. I'm not advocating Dorsey. I never bought he was a uw level player from day 1. The only person who liked Dorsey was Aaron beach who I'm pretty sure had his dick in his mouth while typing.dnc said:
Greens actually an athlete who you can imagine being a solid defender and running the break one day. Dorsey is slow, unathletic and not in very good shape. Maybe he'd be something if he lost 30 pounds, but probably not.NEsnake12 said:
When recruits don't pan out there's no reason to keep them on the roster while they waste a scholarship. Dorsey had 2 years and he didn't prove any real worth to the team, all he could do was shoot 3s (and at average level at best). At least the other mediocre freshman wing Green has some versatility to his offensive game and has a room to improve overall, while I could never fathom Dorsey's having a remotely high ceiling. If they don't really have any visible path to being legitimately good players by their senior year, then sell their couch and move on.FreeChavez said:
So another upper class man thrown to the waste basket leaving all of two players older than soph.NEsnake12 said:
I'm not saying Dorsey should stay, but this constant revolving door of role players is exactly why uw can't make ncaas.
Vets provide early perspective as well as a great push when the freshman wall hits. But Romar must not believe in any of that
My point is that Rosters need depth for a lot of reasons and uw has NEVER been successful with elite frosh as the primary players. How many on here constantly bitch about ncaa vs nba. The idea is to build a program and Romar has failed in so many areas including building a team which fosters certain skills. I hate the zags but they find ways to take shit players and get 10 good minutes. Dorsey may not be the hill to die on but it's just another example of how we(?) lose players as they can become role players.
a lot of people out here assume talent is all that matters and team/vets don't matter. I would argue differently. Uw has become the program many Romar apologists argued against. It's uk lite. Lots of frosh/soph without results, and tons of transfers for guys who don't work right away. It's a pathetic attempt by Romar to keep his job and have people stay engaged in recruits. Teams needs a combo of vets and frosh elite talent to sustain success. Dorsey is just another body in a long line of players who could have helped down the line more than shitty jc transfers brought in with last minute scholarships.
Fultz
?
Thybulle
Dickerson
Dime/Timmons
That second ball handler or is the tough spot to project. I hope it's not Crisp but not sure who else it could be. Green? One of the other unheralded frosh?
I really have no idea who gets that spot.
I don't know anything about Carlos Johnson or Bitumba Baruti (dafuq?), but I doubt they're better than Green and Crisp. I assume Fultz will have the ball in his hands a LOT, so I think that other spot goes to the guard that plays defense and hits open shots. Which is exactly why Thybulle has the 3 spot on lockdown.
My guess is it will be Green. He showed the best shooting stroke and his length gives him an edge on defense. Crisp can be a energy 6th man a la Venoy Big Pimpin Overton.
Fultz will probably play ridiculous minutes because he's gonna have to facilitate the entire offense. And let's hope the late addition guards don't suck, so that Crisp doesn't have to play big minutes too.
#WhyIStayed -
Guys? What your pronoun priviliege, brah.ThomasFremont said:
What do you expect from the same guys that have stuck with the last 15 years of Husky football?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
People care about the upcoming season that is already over?NEsnake12 said:
In the half court, having Green start at the 2 is infinitely better. But I expect Romar to start Crisp because he likes to have at least 2 capable ball handlers on the floor to break presses and run fast breaks. Green and Thybulle just aren't good enough ballhandlers yet, unless they made significant strides in he offseason.ThomasFremont said:
It's weird that this will be one of the deepest front courts of any Romar team ever (assuming Atewe and Timmins are any good), but we? don't have a sure starting guard beyond Fultz.dnc said:
Thybulle started last year and I would imagine Dickerson starts this year so those two should be fine for minutes/roll.theknowledge said:
If one or more of these sophomores don't play significant minutes or develop a roll that they can buy into then I would expect a few of these guys departing before they become that experienced depth that we? would all like to see. The Porters and Nowells of the world don't come in to play school and with Romar they never will. Wash, Rinse, Fuck it.dnc said:
I agree with the larger point I just think we?re better off without Dorsey. Thybulle, Dickerson, Green, Crisp, Durrussea (sp?) have a shot at being those four year, veteran guys. Maybe Timmons too? Keeping and developing them will be crucial.FreeChavez said:
I think a lot of people are losing the point in the Dorsey. I'm not advocating Dorsey. I never bought he was a uw level player from day 1. The only person who liked Dorsey was Aaron beach who I'm pretty sure had his dick in his mouth while typing.dnc said:
Greens actually an athlete who you can imagine being a solid defender and running the break one day. Dorsey is slow, unathletic and not in very good shape. Maybe he'd be something if he lost 30 pounds, but probably not.NEsnake12 said:
When recruits don't pan out there's no reason to keep them on the roster while they waste a scholarship. Dorsey had 2 years and he didn't prove any real worth to the team, all he could do was shoot 3s (and at average level at best). At least the other mediocre freshman wing Green has some versatility to his offensive game and has a room to improve overall, while I could never fathom Dorsey's having a remotely high ceiling. If they don't really have any visible path to being legitimately good players by their senior year, then sell their couch and move on.FreeChavez said:
So another upper class man thrown to the waste basket leaving all of two players older than soph.NEsnake12 said:
I'm not saying Dorsey should stay, but this constant revolving door of role players is exactly why uw can't make ncaas.
Vets provide early perspective as well as a great push when the freshman wall hits. But Romar must not believe in any of that
My point is that Rosters need depth for a lot of reasons and uw has NEVER been successful with elite frosh as the primary players. How many on here constantly bitch about ncaa vs nba. The idea is to build a program and Romar has failed in so many areas including building a team which fosters certain skills. I hate the zags but they find ways to take shit players and get 10 good minutes. Dorsey may not be the hill to die on but it's just another example of how we(?) lose players as they can become role players.
a lot of people out here assume talent is all that matters and team/vets don't matter. I would argue differently. Uw has become the program many Romar apologists argued against. It's uk lite. Lots of frosh/soph without results, and tons of transfers for guys who don't work right away. It's a pathetic attempt by Romar to keep his job and have people stay engaged in recruits. Teams needs a combo of vets and frosh elite talent to sustain success. Dorsey is just another body in a long line of players who could have helped down the line more than shitty jc transfers brought in with last minute scholarships.
Fultz
?
Thybulle
Dickerson
Dime/Timmons
That second ball handler or is the tough spot to project. I hope it's not Crisp but not sure who else it could be. Green? One of the other unheralded frosh?
I really have no idea who gets that spot.
I don't know anything about Carlos Johnson or Bitumba Baruti (dafuq?), but I doubt they're better than Green and Crisp. I assume Fultz will have the ball in his hands a LOT, so I think that other spot goes to the guard that plays defense and hits open shots. Which is exactly why Thybulle has the 3 spot on lockdown.
My guess is it will be Green. He showed the best shooting stroke and his length gives him an edge on defense. Crisp can be a energy 6th man a la Venoy Big Pimpin Overton.
Fultz will probably play ridiculous minutes because he's gonna have to facilitate the entire offense. And let's hope the late addition guards don't suck, so that Crisp doesn't have to play big minutes too.
#WhyIStayed
