Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Now SCOTUS is weighing in on elections

24

Comments

  • OZONE
    OZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    Alexis said:

    OZONE said:

    topdawgnc said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    topdawgnc said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    topdawgnc said:

    Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

    https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

    Sincerely,

    Bush v. Gore
    700 votes

    Anyway you count

    5 SCJ were right

    4 were wrong
    I'm not disputing the outcome.

    I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
    Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

    This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

    Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.

    .
    Umm. This year. Democratic party.
    Really? How many prominent democrats are urging people to vote for Trump?

    Because the number of prominent republicans urging people to vote for Clinton is growing.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,841
    OZONE said:

    topdawgnc said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    topdawgnc said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    topdawgnc said:

    Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

    https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

    Sincerely,

    Bush v. Gore
    700 votes

    Anyway you count

    5 SCJ were right

    4 were wrong
    I'm not disputing the outcome.

    I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
    Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

    This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

    Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.

    It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.
    2008 Barack Obama.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,841
    OZONE said:

    Alexis said:

    OZONE said:

    topdawgnc said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    topdawgnc said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    topdawgnc said:

    Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

    https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

    Sincerely,

    Bush v. Gore
    700 votes

    Anyway you count

    5 SCJ were right

    4 were wrong
    I'm not disputing the outcome.

    I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
    Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

    This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

    Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.

    .
    Umm. This year. Democratic party.
    Really? How many prominent democrats are urging people to vote for Trump?

    Because the number of prominent republicans urging people to vote for Clinton is growing.
    The GOP needs Clinton.

    They need her to continue to raise cash, and they need her as a boogey man.

    Since the USSR died the GOP has nothing to scare American's into voting for them on.

    You're better than this.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    topdawgnc said:

    OZONE said:

    topdawgnc said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    topdawgnc said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    topdawgnc said:

    Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

    https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

    Sincerely,

    Bush v. Gore
    700 votes

    Anyway you count

    5 SCJ were right

    4 were wrong
    I'm not disputing the outcome.

    I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
    Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

    This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

    Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.

    It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.
    2008 Barack Obama.
    topdawgnc said:

    OZONE said:

    topdawgnc said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    topdawgnc said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    topdawgnc said:

    Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

    https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

    Sincerely,

    Bush v. Gore
    700 votes

    Anyway you count

    5 SCJ were right

    4 were wrong
    I'm not disputing the outcome.

    I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
    Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

    This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

    Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.

    It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.
    2008 Barack Obama.
    Hopefully you're not this stupid.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,841
    doogsinparadise said:

    topdawgnc said:

    OZONE said:

    topdawgnc said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    topdawgnc said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    topdawgnc said:

    Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

    https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

    Sincerely,

    Bush v. Gore
    700 votes

    Anyway you count

    5 SCJ were right

    4 were wrong
    I'm not disputing the outcome.

    I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
    Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

    This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

    Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.

    It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.
    2008 Barack Obama.
    topdawgnc said:

    OZONE said:

    topdawgnc said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    topdawgnc said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    topdawgnc said:

    Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

    https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

    Sincerely,

    Bush v. Gore
    700 votes

    Anyway you count

    5 SCJ were right

    4 were wrong
    I'm not disputing the outcome.

    I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
    Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

    This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

    Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.

    It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.
    2008 Barack Obama.
    Hopefully you're not this stupid.
    A four year Junior Senator is qualified?

    I'm as serious as a heart attack.

    Hopefully you're not too stupid to believe he was more qualified than Trump. And the least qualified candidate for President since ... Jesus has there ever been a less qualified candidate?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • OZONE
    OZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    edited July 2016
    topdawgnc said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    topdawgnc said:

    OZONE said:

    topdawgnc said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    topdawgnc said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    topdawgnc said:

    Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

    https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

    Sincerely,

    Bush v. Gore
    700 votes

    Anyway you count

    5 SCJ were right

    4 were wrong
    I'm not disputing the outcome.

    I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
    Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

    This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

    Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.

    It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.
    2008 Barack Obama.
    topdawgnc said:

    OZONE said:

    topdawgnc said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    topdawgnc said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    topdawgnc said:

    Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

    https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

    Sincerely,

    Bush v. Gore
    700 votes

    Anyway you count

    5 SCJ were right

    4 were wrong
    I'm not disputing the outcome.

    I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
    Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

    This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

    Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.

    It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.
    2008 Barack Obama.
    Hopefully you're not this stupid.
    A four year Junior Senator is qualified?

    I'm as serious as a heart attack.

    Hopefully you're not too stupid to believe he was more qualified than Trump. And the least qualified candidate for President since ... Jesus has there ever been a less qualified candidate?
    So unqualified that prominent members of his party, and a former 1st lady from his party, said they would vote for the other party?

    The dislike of Trump by thought leaders of both major parties, is unprecedented. And there is a good reason. He is an ignorant racist fucktard.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,039 Founders Club
    Barack Obama
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    Barack Hussein Obama
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter