Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Now SCOTUS is weighing in on elections

2»

Comments

  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,407 Standard Supporter
  • topdawgnctopdawgnc Member Posts: 7,838
    OZONE said:

    topdawgnc said:

    topdawgnc said:

    OZONE said:

    topdawgnc said:

    topdawgnc said:

    topdawgnc said:

    Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

    https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

    Sincerely,

    Bush v. Gore
    700 votes

    Anyway you count

    5 SCJ were right

    4 were wrong
    I'm not disputing the outcome.

    I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
    Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

    This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

    Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.

    It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.
    2008 Barack Obama.
    topdawgnc said:

    OZONE said:

    topdawgnc said:

    topdawgnc said:

    topdawgnc said:

    Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

    https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

    Sincerely,

    Bush v. Gore
    700 votes

    Anyway you count

    5 SCJ were right

    4 were wrong
    I'm not disputing the outcome.

    I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
    Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

    This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

    Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.

    It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.
    2008 Barack Obama.
    Hopefully you're not this stupid.
    A four year Junior Senator is qualified?

    I'm as serious as a heart attack.

    Hopefully you're not too stupid to believe he was more qualified than Trump. And the least qualified candidate for President since ... Jesus has there ever been a less qualified candidate?
    So unqualified that prominent members of his party, and a former 1st lady from his party, said they would vote for the other party?

    The dislike of Trump by thought leaders of both major parties, is unprecedented. And there is a good reason. He is an ignorant racist fucktard.
    “A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee,” Clinton is quoted as saying

    “Obama doesn’t know how to be president,” Clinton told friends and political advisers last year, the article added. “He doesn’t know how the world works.”
  • OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    I guarantee you she voted for him.
  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,535 Founders Club
    Now I want Trump to win just so Ginsburg will go the fuck away.
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,320 Founders Club
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,320 Founders Club
    topdawgnc said:

    topdawgnc said:

    OZONE said:

    topdawgnc said:

    topdawgnc said:

    topdawgnc said:

    Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

    https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

    Sincerely,

    Bush v. Gore
    700 votes

    Anyway you count

    5 SCJ were right

    4 were wrong
    I'm not disputing the outcome.

    I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
    Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

    This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

    Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.

    It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.
    2008 Barack Obama.
    topdawgnc said:

    OZONE said:

    topdawgnc said:

    topdawgnc said:

    topdawgnc said:

    Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

    https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

    Sincerely,

    Bush v. Gore
    700 votes

    Anyway you count

    5 SCJ were right

    4 were wrong
    I'm not disputing the outcome.

    I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
    Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

    This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

    Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.

    It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.
    2008 Barack Obama.
    Hopefully you're not this stupid.
    A four year Junior Senator is qualified?

    I'm as serious as a heart attack.

    Hopefully you're not too stupid to believe he was more qualified than Trump. And the least qualified candidate for President since ... Jesus has there ever been a less qualified candidate?
    You're giving him way too much credit. During his one and only partial US Senate term he spent most of his time campaigning for president.
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    If your gonna ignore the Leadership by BHO when he led that bi-partisan effort to craft and pass perhaps... the most important legislation of our time... I can't help you
  • topdawgnctopdawgnc Member Posts: 7,838
    OZONE said:

    I guarantee you she voted for him.

    It was a former President who made those racist claims.

    And I guarantee you the GOP will vote for Trump.

  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Swaye said:

    Now I want Trump to win just so Ginsburg will fuck him

  • AlexisAlexis Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,190 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited July 2016


    Really? How many prominent democrats are urging people to vote for Trump?

    Because the number of prominent republicans urging people to vote for Clinton is growing.

    Those prominent democrats may not be particularly smart, but they have seen the trail of dead bodies of those who dare to cross the Clintons. They know better.

  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,765 Standard Supporter

    Swaye said:

    Now I want Trump to win just so Ginsburg will fuck him

    That visual is worse than Lemonparty.org.

  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,886
    topdawgnc said:

    topdawgnc said:

    topdawgnc said:

    Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

    https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

    Sincerely,

    Bush v. Gore
    700 votes

    Anyway you count

    5 SCJ were right

    4 were wrong
    I'm not disputing the outcome.

    I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
    Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

    This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

    The fix is in.
    Losers. Lose.

    Even more fucktard losers make excuses before the game even begins.
  • OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    topdawgnc said:

    OZONE said:

    I guarantee you she voted for him.

    And I guarantee you the GOP will vote for Trump.

    Some prominent GOP leaders disagree with you.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,496 Founders Club
    OZONE said:

    topdawgnc said:

    OZONE said:

    I guarantee you she voted for him.

    And I guarantee you the GOP will vote for Trump.

    Some prominent GOP leaders disagree with you.
    Who the fuck cares what a bunch of dead white males think anyway?

    Pick your game up
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,407 Standard Supporter
    OZONE said:

    topdawgnc said:

    topdawgnc said:

    topdawgnc said:

    Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

    https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

    Sincerely,

    Bush v. Gore
    700 votes

    Anyway you count

    5 SCJ were right

    4 were wrong
    I'm not disputing the outcome.

    I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
    Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

    This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

    Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.

    It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.
    Neither party has a thought, let alone a leader!
Sign In or Register to comment.