Now SCOTUS is weighing in on elections
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Comments
-
looks like Trump might get a twofer if he wins
-
Where have you been the last 100 years?topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html -
Sincerely,topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Bush v. Gore -
700 votesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Sincerely,topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Bush v. Gore
Anyway you count
5 SCJ were right
4 were wrong -
I'm not disputing the outcome.topdawgnc said:
700 votesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Sincerely,topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Bush v. Gore
Anyway you count
5 SCJ were right
4 were wrong
I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is. -
Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm not disputing the outcome.topdawgnc said:
700 votesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Sincerely,topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Bush v. Gore
Anyway you count
5 SCJ were right
4 were wrong
I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.
The fix is in. -
You think I clicked that shit?topdawgnc said:
Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm not disputing the outcome.topdawgnc said:
700 votesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Sincerely,topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Bush v. Gore
Anyway you count
5 SCJ were right
4 were wrong
I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.
The fix is in. -
Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.topdawgnc said:
Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm not disputing the outcome.topdawgnc said:
700 votesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Sincerely,topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Bush v. Gore
Anyway you count
5 SCJ were right
4 were wrong
I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.
It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump. -
-
Umm. This year. Democratic party.OZONE said:
Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.topdawgnc said:
Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm not disputing the outcome.topdawgnc said:
700 votesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Sincerely,topdawgnc said:Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.
https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html
Bush v. Gore
Anyway you count
5 SCJ were right
4 were wrong
I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.
This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.
.
