Now SCOTUS is weighing in on elections

topdawgnc

Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

sarktastic

looks like Trump might get a twofer if he wins

2001400ex

topdawgnc said:

Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

Where have you been the last 100 years?

TierbsHsotBoobs

topdawgnc said:

Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

Sincerely,

Bush v. Gore

topdawgnc

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

Sincerely,

Bush v. Gore

700 votes

Anyway you count

5 SCJ were right

4 were wrong

TierbsHsotBoobs

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

Sincerely,

Bush v. Gore

700 votes

Anyway you count

5 SCJ were right

4 were wrong

I'm not disputing the outcome.

I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.

topdawgnc

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

Sincerely,

Bush v. Gore

700 votes

Anyway you count

5 SCJ were right

4 were wrong

I'm not disputing the outcome.

I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.

Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

The fix is in.

TierbsHsotBoobs

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

Sincerely,

Bush v. Gore

700 votes

Anyway you count

5 SCJ were right

4 were wrong

I'm not disputing the outcome.

I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.

Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

The fix is in.

You think I clicked that shit?

OZONE

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

Sincerely,

Bush v. Gore

700 votes

Anyway you count

5 SCJ were right

4 were wrong

I'm not disputing the outcome.

I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.

Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.

It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.

GrundleStiltzkin

http://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/752681409853136896

Alexis

OZONE said:

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

Sincerely,

Bush v. Gore

700 votes

Anyway you count

5 SCJ were right

4 were wrong

I'm not disputing the outcome.

I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.

Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.

.

Umm. This year. Democratic party.

OZONE

Alexis said:

OZONE said:

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

Sincerely,

Bush v. Gore

700 votes

Anyway you count

5 SCJ were right

4 were wrong

I'm not disputing the outcome.

I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.

Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.

.

Umm. This year. Democratic party.

Really? How many prominent democrats are urging people to vote for Trump?

Because the number of prominent republicans urging people to vote for Clinton is growing.

topdawgnc

OZONE said:

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

Sincerely,

Bush v. Gore

700 votes

Anyway you count

5 SCJ were right

4 were wrong

I'm not disputing the outcome.

I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.

Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.

It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.

2008 Barack Obama.

topdawgnc

OZONE said:

Alexis said:

OZONE said:

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

Sincerely,

Bush v. Gore

700 votes

Anyway you count

5 SCJ were right

4 were wrong

I'm not disputing the outcome.

I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.

Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.

.

Umm. This year. Democratic party.

Really? How many prominent democrats are urging people to vote for Trump?

Because the number of prominent republicans urging people to vote for Clinton is growing.

The GOP needs Clinton.

They need her to continue to raise cash, and they need her as a boogey man.

Since the USSR died the GOP has nothing to scare American's into voting for them on.

You're better than this.

doogsinparadise

topdawgnc said:

OZONE said:

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

Sincerely,

Bush v. Gore

700 votes

Anyway you count

5 SCJ were right

4 were wrong

I'm not disputing the outcome.

I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.

Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.

It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.

2008 Barack Obama.

topdawgnc said:

OZONE said:

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

Sincerely,

Bush v. Gore

700 votes

Anyway you count

5 SCJ were right

4 were wrong

I'm not disputing the outcome.

I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.

Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.

It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.

2008 Barack Obama.

Hopefully you're not this stupid.

topdawgnc

doogsinparadise said:

topdawgnc said:

OZONE said:

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

Sincerely,

Bush v. Gore

700 votes

Anyway you count

5 SCJ were right

4 were wrong

I'm not disputing the outcome.

I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.

Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.

It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.

2008 Barack Obama.

topdawgnc said:

OZONE said:

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

Sincerely,

Bush v. Gore

700 votes

Anyway you count

5 SCJ were right

4 were wrong

I'm not disputing the outcome.

I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.

Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.

It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.

2008 Barack Obama.

Hopefully you're not this stupid.

A four year Junior Senator is qualified?

I'm as serious as a heart attack.

Hopefully you're not too stupid to believe he was more qualified than Trump. And the least qualified candidate for President since ... Jesus has there ever been a less qualified candidate?

Swaye

topdawgnc said:

doogsinparadise said:

topdawgnc said:

OZONE said:

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

Sincerely,

Bush v. Gore

700 votes

Anyway you count

5 SCJ were right

4 were wrong

I'm not disputing the outcome.

I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.

Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.

It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.

2008 Barack Obama.

topdawgnc said:

OZONE said:

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

Sincerely,

Bush v. Gore

700 votes

Anyway you count

5 SCJ were right

4 were wrong

I'm not disputing the outcome.

I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.

Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.

It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.

2008 Barack Obama.

Hopefully you're not this stupid.

A four year Junior Senator is qualified?

I'm as serious as a heart attack.

Hopefully you're not too stupid to believe he was more qualified than Trump. And the least qualified candidate for President since ... Jesus has there ever been a less qualified candidate?

Being a community organizer is hard.

OZONE

topdawgnc said:

doogsinparadise said:

topdawgnc said:

OZONE said:

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

Sincerely,

Bush v. Gore

700 votes

Anyway you count

5 SCJ were right

4 were wrong

I'm not disputing the outcome.

I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.

Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.

It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.

2008 Barack Obama.

topdawgnc said:

OZONE said:

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

Sincerely,

Bush v. Gore

700 votes

Anyway you count

5 SCJ were right

4 were wrong

I'm not disputing the outcome.

I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.

Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.

It isn't really surprising that mainstream thought leaders from both parties are against Trump.

2008 Barack Obama.

Hopefully you're not this stupid.

A four year Junior Senator is qualified?

I'm as serious as a heart attack.

Hopefully you're not too stupid to believe he was more qualified than Trump. And the least qualified candidate for President since ... Jesus has there ever been a less qualified candidate?

So unqualified that prominent members of his party, and a former 1st lady from his party, said they would vote for the other party?

The dislike of Trump by thought leaders of both major parties, is unprecedented. And there is a good reason. He is an ignorant racist fucktard.

CuntWaffle

OZONE said:

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

topdawgnc said:

Nice to know we have judges who aren't partial.

https://yahoo.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-000000695.html

Sincerely,

Bush v. Gore

700 votes

Anyway you count

5 SCJ were right

4 were wrong

I'm not disputing the outcome.

I'm just pointing out how dumb your poont is.

Name the last time a sitting SCJ weighed in on a Presidential election. You can point to Gore v. Bush ... that was a decision with facts weighed in front of the bench.

This is a SCJ who has said she will move to New Zealand if he is elected.

Name the last time somebody as fucking ridiculous and unqualified for the job, as Trump, won the nomination of a major party.

Barack Obama

RaceBannon

Barack Obama

sarktastic

Barack Hussein Obama