Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Seattle Times Sucks Again

13»

Comments

  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    RaceBannon said:

    Bob Condotta never said he was a columnist. Frankly I don't even know why he gives his opinion with the way you guys treat him. I know I wouldn't


    Fixed for our former premium partner (RIP).
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    CollegeDoog said:

    I like the Times. Sure columnists are sometimes fucktarded but they do a comprehensive job on local sports. The blogs are really good. Coverage of everything leading up to the Arena was great. The animosity on here towards them is nitpicky.

    The way they fought the Sonics makes them Steve Kelly FS as far as I'm concerned.

    The Times can DIAFF.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 0
    dnc said:

    CollegeDoog said:

    I like the Times. Sure columnists are sometimes fucktarded but they do a comprehensive job on local sports. The blogs are really good. Coverage of everything leading up to the Arena was great. The animosity on here towards them is nitpicky.

    The way they fought the Sonics makes them Steve Kelly FS as far as I'm concerned.

    The Times can DIAFF.

    Editorials are different than reporting which was very good in this case.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    edited September 2013
    CollegeDoog said:

    dnc said:

    CollegeDoog said:

    I like the Times. Sure columnists are sometimes fucktarded but they do a comprehensive job on local sports. The blogs are really good. Coverage of everything leading up to the Arena was great. The animosity on here towards them is nitpicky.

    The way they fought the Sonics makes them Steve Kelly FS as far as I'm concerned.

    The Times can DIAFF.

    Editorials are different than reporting which was very good in this case.
    I understand the difference. I don't have a problem with their reporting. I think Condotta's awesome. I really like Larry Stone as a columnist. But Kelly and Baker are awful and the overall agenda of the paper is turrible.

    You're right that Seattle is better off with the Times than without, but just because there is no one to step into the void the Times DIAFF would create.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,587 Founders Club
    CollegeDoog said:

    dnc said:

    CollegeDoog said:

    I like the Times. Sure columnists are sometimes fucktarded but they do a comprehensive job on local sports. The blogs are really good. Coverage of everything leading up to the Arena was great. The animosity on here towards them is nitpicky.

    The way they fought the Sonics makes them Steve Kelly FS as far as I'm concerned.

    The Times can DIAFF.

    Editorials are different than reporting which was very good in this case.
    Do some people need to learn the difference?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter