Good Jack Lockner Analysis For Those Who Care
Comments
-
I know I am going to regret it, but I will respond.He_Needs_More_Time said:Is this another bullshit attempt at "not defending" Locker?!
Comparing Locker to Elway is dumber than anything AuburnDoogFS has ever said.
Take that bad Doog argument back to Doogman.
It was a statement about writing off ANY QB after 19 NFL starts. Especially when half those starts were with a bum shoulder.
Once again, not a comparison, just a statement about LIPO.
Not throw this post into the spin machine in 3, 2, 1.....
-
So you think Brandon Weeden can still be a quality NFL QB?IrishDawg22 said:
I know I am going to regret it, but I will respond.He_Needs_More_Time said:Is this another bullshit attempt at "not defending" Locker?!
Comparing Locker to Elway is dumber than anything AuburnDoogFS has ever said.
Take that bad Doog argument back to Doogman.
It was a statement about writing off ANY QB after 19 NFL starts. Especially when half those starts were with a bum shoulder.
Once again, not a comparison, just a statement about LIPO.
Not throw this post into the spin machine in 3, 2, 1.....
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/W/WeedBr00.htm -
Frank Beamer was bad enough but comparing Lockner to Elway may be the ultimate doogdumb of all time
-
Sample size is really small and that franchise is a mess. He has shown some upside, but the number of INTs is a major concern. If I was the GM, the QB spot would be the least of my worries right now.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
So you think Brandon Weeden can still be a quality NFL QB?IrishDawg22 said:
I know I am going to regret it, but I will respond.He_Needs_More_Time said:Is this another bullshit attempt at "not defending" Locker?!
Comparing Locker to Elway is dumber than anything AuburnDoogFS has ever said.
Take that bad Doog argument back to Doogman.
It was a statement about writing off ANY QB after 19 NFL starts. Especially when half those starts were with a bum shoulder.
Once again, not a comparison, just a statement about LIPO.
Not throw this post into the spin machine in 3, 2, 1.....
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/W/WeedBr00.htm
Outside of last year's crazy rookie seasons, history tells us it usually take 3+ years (in terms of starts) for a QB to settle in. -
IrishDoogFS has SURPASSED Section14AFS territory in this thread.RaceBannon said:Frank Beamer was bad enough but comparing Lockner to Elway may be the ultimate doogdumb of all time
-
Some of those lines "never" get old.
)
Keep comin' with the classics.
-
I better start using more pics for the "special" people around here.RaceBannon said:Frank Beamer was bad enough but comparing Lockner to Elway may be the ultimate doogdumb of all time
I do donate as much as possible so I hope it helps. -
Every QB who is considered good in today's NFL established themselves by year three if not much sooner.
So continue to spread bullshit myths.
Great passive aggressive pussy defense as always. -
Peyton Manning's avg. QB rating Years 1-5 = 85.8
Avg QB rating the rest of his career = 105
Even one of the greatest QBs of all time show dramatic improvement after Yr 5.
Now someone will do their best 23 degrees of KB and say I am now comparing JL to Peyton.
-
Uh you are.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)