Why we're* dooging and why Petersen must win now [deserves own thread]
CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:If Petersen can't win in year three with the talent he has brought in he is not the guy. Straight up.
I praise him because I believe he has done a great job of building up the talent. Just look at the thread that was bumped the other day that Passion started before the 2013 season saying the depth chart is a thing of beauty (the 2016 depth chart compared to the 2013 depth chart is a night and day difference). Petersen has done a great job at building our depth up and shit. I doog hard for him because of that and his philosophy on culture and all that.
But he needs to fucking win this year. And he needs to win because he has built up the talent to do it right fucking now.
10-2.
Comments
-
I hope this time next year we are all beatin our meat for Pete. #showme #nomeatloafin'16
-
Loser program until proven otherwise.
Simple fact. -
But Kent Griswold said everything was pointing to a special year in 2013.
Stadium opened, Sark's 5th year, etc.
Was winning the Fight Hunger Bowl special? I guess it was played in December. -
10-2 (11-2?) is my bar for the team. 13-0 is possible with our schedule.
-
2013 WAS special. Thank you Pat Haden!
-
Sark should have been fired long before then.Ice_Holmvik said:2013 WAS special. Thank you Pat Haden!
-
Whats this 'we' stuff?
-
8-4, is the bar in year 3. Anything over that is a nice bonus. This was a 3-4-win team 2 years ago when Pete took over. Fortunately Pete bandaged and superglued his way to 7 wins.DeepSeaZ said:10-2 (11-2?) is my bar for the team. 13-0 is possible with our schedule.
-
Pete's one 5-4 in three years > Sark's two 5-4 in three years.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
8-4, is the bar in year 3. Anything over that is a nice bonus.DeepSeaZ said:10-2 (11-2?) is my bar for the team. 13-0 is possible with our schedule.
Everybody says so. -
Death row records didn't peak until year 3 either. That's when they dropped classics.
Hmmmmm.gif
