Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

This woman shouldn't have had access to firearms

1356

Comments

  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,616 Standard Supporter
    doogsinparadise said:

    There's owning guns in a sober check against governmental overreach, and then there are the gun nuts like sledog that have unhealthy oral-phallic fixations.

    You are the overreach.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    There's owning guns in a sober check against governmental overreach, and then there are the gun nuts like sledog that have unhealthy oral-phallic fixations.

    You are the overreach.
    I definitely read in the Constitution that guns are not to be regulated. That has held up in case law over 200 years.


    Oh wait.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,616 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    There's owning guns in a sober check against governmental overreach, and then there are the gun nuts like sledog that have unhealthy oral-phallic fixations.

    You are the overreach.
    I definitely read in the Constitution that guns are not to be regulated. That has held up in case law over 200 years.


    Oh wait.
    Inalienable right that existed prior to the constitution. Considered God given.

    I just keep wondering who they're gonna get to go take them all? Doubt the lib's will be first in the door.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    There's owning guns in a sober check against governmental overreach, and then there are the gun nuts like sledog that have unhealthy oral-phallic fixations.

    You are the overreach.
    I definitely read in the Constitution that guns are not to be regulated. That has held up in case law over 200 years.


    Oh wait.
    Inalienable right that existed prior to the constitution. Considered God given.

    I just keep wondering who they're gonna get to go take them all? Doubt the lib's will be first in the door.
    Who is calling to take any gun away from anyone. Fuck you are stupid and gullible.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    There's owning guns in a sober check against governmental overreach, and then there are the gun nuts like sledog that have unhealthy oral-phallic fixations.

    You are the overreach.
    I definitely read in the Constitution that guns are not to be regulated. That has held up in case law over 200 years.


    Oh wait.
    Inalienable right that existed prior to the constitution. Considered God given.

    I just keep wondering who they're gonna get to go take them all? Doubt the lib's will be first in the door.
    I must have missed that part in the bible. Dumbfuck.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,616 Standard Supporter
    doogsinparadise said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    There's owning guns in a sober check against governmental overreach, and then there are the gun nuts like sledog that have unhealthy oral-phallic fixations.

    You are the overreach.
    I definitely read in the Constitution that guns are not to be regulated. That has held up in case law over 200 years.


    Oh wait.
    Inalienable right that existed prior to the constitution. Considered God given.

    I just keep wondering who they're gonna get to go take them all? Doubt the lib's will be first in the door.
    I must have missed that part in the bible. Dumbfuck.
    Just read the founders. Maybe you'll get it shitstain.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,616 Standard Supporter
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    There's owning guns in a sober check against governmental overreach, and then there are the gun nuts like sledog that have unhealthy oral-phallic fixations.

    You are the overreach.
    I definitely read in the Constitution that guns are not to be regulated. That has held up in case law over 200 years.


    Oh wait.
    Inalienable right that existed prior to the constitution. Considered God given.

    I just keep wondering who they're gonna get to go take them all? Doubt the lib's will be first in the door.
    Right it has not. Current administration wants to take them all. What do you think Fast and Furious was really all about?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    There's owning guns in a sober check against governmental overreach, and then there are the gun nuts like sledog that have unhealthy oral-phallic fixations.

    You are the overreach.
    I definitely read in the Constitution that guns are not to be regulated. That has held up in case law over 200 years.


    Oh wait.
    Inalienable right that existed prior to the constitution. Considered God given.

    I just keep wondering who they're gonna get to go take them all? Doubt the lib's will be first in the door.
    I must have missed that part in the bible. Dumbfuck.
    Just read the founders. Maybe you'll get it shitstain.
    This has gotta be a troll account, no one is this fucktarded.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    There's owning guns in a sober check against governmental overreach, and then there are the gun nuts like sledog that have unhealthy oral-phallic fixations.

    You are the overreach.
    I definitely read in the Constitution that guns are not to be regulated. That has held up in case law over 200 years.


    Oh wait.
    Inalienable right that existed prior to the constitution. Considered God given.

    I just keep wondering who they're gonna get to go take them all? Doubt the lib's will be first in the door.
    Right it has not. Current administration wants to take them all. What do you think Fast and Furious was really all about?
    I mean you just agreed with your own post as if it was someone else. Forget to switch profiles?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter