Tedford to UW as offensive consultant
Comments
-
-
Tommy?
-
Did we win the fucking conference yet? Didn't think so.
-
That TE coach is quite possibly the weakest link now. 5-6 TEs on the roster now, and none of them look decent.
-
I suspect it Peterson's rationale went like this: Year 1, Cyler was a huge, bizarre project QB who didn't throw down field well, but was athletic. Not CP's QB type at all, so he gives Smiff a free pass on responsibility for that. Plus, CP was busting his Pac12 cherry that year, shaking lots of hands, and enjoying press fellatio all year long. Abundant distractions.
Year 2: Frosh QB, rebuilt O-line, below-average receivers, but also lots of bad play calling which gets CP's attention, but not enough to lay entirely on Smiff's shoulders as he's primarily focused on bringing his young QB along in a league that's a lot tougher than the one he came from. Abundant receiver drops and overall shit talent at WR again obscures the diaper gravy pouring from the OC booth above the field.
Year 3: CP realizes Smiff is below average and not a good play caller, so he doesn't renew his contract. But Smiff is now a friend, plus a former Pac10 QB guiding and tailoring his playbook for his now Soph QB, so CP won't pull the trigger and dump him, but gives him his last chance, including bringing in a former Pac12 HC to oversee and replace Smiff if necessary, making Tedford both the carrot and the stick to isolate the problem and get it off CP's desk. In CP's mind, he's given Smiff his sink or swim opportunity, and Tedford is the interference runner between CP and Smiff, who will ultimately deliver the order CP gives on whether Smiff lives or dies. And sometime a guy's gotta get whacked.
Smiff should've been replaced after last year, and CP is going way beyond the norm in keeping him on. There are too many proven OC's available, so this special favor for a friend is a loser's dream, and a cynic's wet dream. Race is right when he diagnoses this "loser mentality" as a continuing cancer plaguing the program, and I cannot foresee a season where we don't give away at least one game due to shit play calling or the absence of a 2 minute offense. 9-3. -
Fuck off @TequillaTurdBuffer said:I suspect it Peterson's rationale went like this: Year 1, Cyler was a huge, bizarre project QB who didn't throw down field well, but was athletic. Not CP's QB type at all, so he gives Smiff a free pass on responsibility for that. Plus, CP was busting his Pac12 cherry that year, shaking lots of hands, and enjoying press fellatio all year long. Abundant distractions.
Year 2: Frosh QB, rebuilt O-line, below-average receivers, but also lots of bad play calling which gets CP's attention, but not enough to lay entirely on Smiff's shoulders as he's primarily focused on bringing his young QB along in a league that's a lot tougher than the one he came from. Abundant receiver drops and overall shit talent at WR again obscures the diaper gravy pouring from the OC booth above the field.
Year 3: CP realizes Smiff is below average and not a good play caller, so he doesn't renew his contract. But Smiff is now a friend, plus a former Pac10 QB guiding and tailoring his playbook for his now Soph QB, so CP won't pull the trigger and dump him, but gives him his last chance, including bringing in a former Pac12 HC to oversee and replace Smiff if necessary, making Tedford both the carrot and the stick to isolate the problem and get it off CP's desk. In CP's mind, he's given Smiff his sink or swim opportunity, and Tedford is the interference runner between CP and Smiff, who will ultimately deliver the order CP gives on whether Smiff lives or dies. And sometime a guy's gotta get whacked.
Smiff should've been replaced after last year, and CP is going way beyond the norm in keeping him on. There are too many proven OC's available, so this special favor for a friend is a loser's dream, and a cynic's wet dream. Race is right when he diagnoses this "loser mentality" as a continuing cancer plaguing the program, and I cannot foresee a season where we don't give away at least one game due to shit play calling or the absence of a 2 minute offense. 9-3. -
Chincredibled for diaper gravy. That is going into the rotation.TurdBuffer said:I suspect it Peterson's rationale went like this: Year 1, Cyler was a huge, bizarre project QB who didn't throw down field well, but was athletic. Not CP's QB type at all, so he gives Smiff a free pass on responsibility for that. Plus, CP was busting his Pac12 cherry that year, shaking lots of hands, and enjoying press fellatio all year long. Abundant distractions.
Year 2: Frosh QB, rebuilt O-line, below-average receivers, but also lots of bad play calling which gets CP's attention, but not enough to lay entirely on Smiff's shoulders as he's primarily focused on bringing his young QB along in a league that's a lot tougher than the one he came from. Abundant receiver drops and overall shit talent at WR again obscures the diaper gravy pouring from the OC booth above the field.
Year 3: CP realizes Smiff is below average and not a good play caller, so he doesn't renew his contract. But Smiff is now a friend, plus a former Pac10 QB guiding and tailoring his playbook for his now Soph QB, so CP won't pull the trigger and dump him, but gives him his last chance, including bringing in a former Pac12 HC to oversee and replace Smiff if necessary, making Tedford both the carrot and the stick to isolate the problem and get it off CP's desk. In CP's mind, he's given Smiff his sink or swim opportunity, and Tedford is the interference runner between CP and Smiff, who will ultimately deliver the order CP gives on whether Smiff lives or dies. And sometime a guy's gotta get whacked.
Smiff should've been replaced after last year, and CP is going way beyond the norm in keeping him on. There are too many proven OC's available, so this special favor for a friend is a loser's dream, and a cynic's wet dream. Race is right when he diagnoses this "loser mentality" as a continuing cancer plaguing the program, and I cannot foresee a season where we don't give away at least one game due to shit play calling or the absence of a 2 minute offense. 9-3. -
disagreeTurdBuffer said:I suspect it Peterson's rationale went like this: Year 1, Cyler was a huge, bizarre project QB who didn't throw down field well, but was athletic. Not CP's QB type at all, so he gives Smiff a free pass on responsibility for that. Plus, CP was busting his Pac12 cherry that year, shaking lots of hands, and enjoying press fellatio all year long. Abundant distractions.
Year 2: Frosh QB, rebuilt O-line, below-average receivers, but also lots of bad play calling which gets CP's attention, but not enough to lay entirely on Smiff's shoulders as he's primarily focused on bringing his young QB along in a league that's a lot tougher than the one he came from. Abundant receiver drops and overall shit talent at WR again obscures the diaper gravy pouring from the OC booth above the field.
Year 3: CP realizes Smiff is below average and not a good play caller, so he doesn't renew his contract. But Smiff is now a friend, plus a former Pac10 QB guiding and tailoring his playbook for his now Soph QB, so CP won't pull the trigger and dump him, but gives him his last chance, including bringing in a former Pac12 HC to oversee and replace Smiff if necessary, making Tedford both the carrot and the stick to isolate the problem and get it off CP's desk. In CP's mind, he's given Smiff his sink or swim opportunity, and Tedford is the interference runner between CP and Smiff, who will ultimately deliver the order CP gives on whether Smiff lives or dies. And sometime a guy's gotta get whacked.
Smiff should've been replaced after last year, and CP is going way beyond the norm in keeping him on. There are too many proven OC's available, so this special favor for a friend is a loser's dream, and a cynic's wet dream. Race is right when he diagnoses this "loser mentality" as a continuing cancer plaguing the program, and I cannot foresee a season where we don't give away at least one game due to shit play calling or the absence of a 2 minute offense. 9-3. -
It was so funny I got over the grossness of it right away, and it made me hungry for biscuits.Swaye said:
Chincredibled for diaper gravy. That is going into the rotation.TurdBuffer said:I suspect it Peterson's rationale went like this: Year 1, Cyler was a huge, bizarre project QB who didn't throw down field well, but was athletic. Not CP's QB type at all, so he gives Smiff a free pass on responsibility for that. Plus, CP was busting his Pac12 cherry that year, shaking lots of hands, and enjoying press fellatio all year long. Abundant distractions.
Year 2: Frosh QB, rebuilt O-line, below-average receivers, but also lots of bad play calling which gets CP's attention, but not enough to lay entirely on Smiff's shoulders as he's primarily focused on bringing his young QB along in a league that's a lot tougher than the one he came from. Abundant receiver drops and overall shit talent at WR again obscures the diaper gravy pouring from the OC booth above the field.
Year 3: CP realizes Smiff is below average and not a good play caller, so he doesn't renew his contract. But Smiff is now a friend, plus a former Pac10 QB guiding and tailoring his playbook for his now Soph QB, so CP won't pull the trigger and dump him, but gives him his last chance, including bringing in a former Pac12 HC to oversee and replace Smiff if necessary, making Tedford both the carrot and the stick to isolate the problem and get it off CP's desk. In CP's mind, he's given Smiff his sink or swim opportunity, and Tedford is the interference runner between CP and Smiff, who will ultimately deliver the order CP gives on whether Smiff lives or dies. And sometime a guy's gotta get whacked.
Smiff should've been replaced after last year, and CP is going way beyond the norm in keeping him on. There are too many proven OC's available, so this special favor for a friend is a loser's dream, and a cynic's wet dream. Race is right when he diagnoses this "loser mentality" as a continuing cancer plaguing the program, and I cannot foresee a season where we don't give away at least one game due to shit play calling or the absence of a 2 minute offense. 9-3. -
Boobie, I'd like to punch you in the cunt. You''ve been added to the list of dawgmen who arent getting back on the wagon next year. Go back into hiding...and dont come out when the dawgs are 7-0, Id never hit a lady, but will make an exception in your caseTierbsHsotBoobs said:If you have to hire an offensive consultant, you have the wrong offensive coordinator.
And if your head coach can't figure out you have the wrong offensive coordinator, you have the wrong head coach.
