Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

A few interesting decisions by Sark

2»

Comments

  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,137

    Oregon runs fast paced smashmouth people.

    They have good lineman, but I wouldn't consider it smashmouth. They also run a lot of bubble screens.

  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Oregon runs fast paced smashmouth people.

    They have good lineman, but I wouldn't consider it smashmouth. They also run a lot of bubble screens.

    Oregon's run/pass ratio is the highest in the conference.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,137

    Oregon runs fast paced smashmouth people.

    They have good lineman, but I wouldn't consider it smashmouth. They also run a lot of bubble screens.

    Oregon's run/pass ratio is the highest in the conference.
    Point taken, but it's not the Alabama or Stanford model of smash mouth. Oregon runs zone blocking, Alabama and Stanford try and knock the DL off the ball.

  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Oregon runs fast paced smashmouth people.

    They have good lineman, but I wouldn't consider it smashmouth. They also run a lot of bubble screens.

    Oregon's run/pass ratio is the highest in the conference.
    Point taken, but it's not the Alabama or Stanford model of smash mouth. Oregon runs zone blocking, Alabama and Stanford try and knock the DL off the ball.

    And counterpoint taken.

  • Global
    Global Member Posts: 333
    Shelton is hurt, and we ought to have sat him out of this game. Playing him still in the second half is stupid.
    I have no problem with sitting Sankey, though. I also would not have objected if Sark let him in long enough to get over 100 yards, but that is mostly for Sankey's place in Husky posterity.
  • Homebrew_Dawg
    Homebrew_Dawg Member Posts: 1,652
    Global said:

    Shelton is hurt, and we ought to have sat him out of this game. Playing him still in the second half is stupid.
    I have no problem with sitting Sankey, though. I also would not have objected if Sark

    What can be done to get Sark out of the games?
  • jmc84
    jmc84 Member Posts: 499

    Global said:

    Shelton is hurt, and we ought to have sat him out of this game. Playing him still in the second half is stupid.
    I have no problem with sitting Sankey, though. I also would not have objected if Sark

    What can be done to get Sark out of the games?
    We need him to get ejected for targeting, or suspended for getting caught doing 90 while doing blow off a hooker's ass.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,137
    edited September 2013
    jmc84 said:

    Global said:

    Shelton is hurt, and we ought to have sat him out of this game. Playing him still in the second half is stupid.
    I have no problem with sitting Sankey, though. I also would not have objected if Sark

    What can be done to get Sark out of the games?
    We need him to get ejected for targeting, or suspended for getting caught doing 90 while doing blow off a hooker's Joey's waitress' ass.
  • You are going to need a lot of bodies on D mid way through Pac 12 play. Nearly every team now runs the up tempo, and even Stanford did some tonight against ASU.

    He doesn't defend Sark guys....
  • IrishDawg22
    IrishDawg22 Member Posts: 2,754
    edited September 2013

    You are going to need a lot of bodies on D mid way through Pac 12 play. Nearly every team now runs the up tempo, and even Stanford did some tonight against ASU.

    He doesn't defend Sark guys....
    If making a valid point is defending Sark, then sign me up. Or I could be a dumb fuck like you and never bring anything to the table.

    Or I forgot, 5 reasons are more you cup of tea.
  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    edited September 2013


    In all fairness, LIFPO.

    Sankey barely played his true frosh year and now look at him. No would know how good he would be in two years. Its just one example. Jamora played as a true freshman and really came on in the last half of the 2010 season. If Sark had properly recruited then it would be less of a problem. If Tosh can get the same DL class this season as last season then burning Farria's redshirt is not a big deal.

    I don't like the decision but just trying to look at the other side of it. Farria is a super talented kid and if he can get enough game experience this season (more than 3-4 games) then play him and it might help him make a stronger impact as a true soph than a RS fresh with no game experience. Now if he only plays another game or two, then it is a fucktarded decision. Hence, LIFPO.

    If they weren't good enough to play in the fourth quarter mop up time against Boise, why burn redshirts today?
    For true freshman that gives them another month of experience to learn the playbook etc. These guys just got here in August, so another 4 weeks or 6 weeks is a substantial difference in experience. It gives the coaches another month (and 3 games) to see if the dead weight (i.e Potoe, Finau, Tupou) has any final hope.

    In Farria's case, hopefully they are playing him because they think he can really contribute before the end of the season. If not, its fucktarded.
    Get the fuck out of here.

    They didn't need to learn the playbook in garbage time against Boise three weeks ago. That's WHY it's called garbage time.

    They could have drawn up plays in the vaunted Husky Softball Stadium dirt and still plunger raped the Bengals today.
    Playbook superiority guy.