Why the Seahawks aren't ready to give up on TE Jimmy Graham

DerekJohnson

espn.go.com/blog/seattle-seahawks/post/_/id/18922/why-the-seahawks-arent-ready-to-give-up-on-te-jimmy-graham

PurpleBaze

They should have cut him loose.

He done.

Fire_Marshall_Bill

It's worth giving him another year but if he doesn't produce at least near what he did with the Aints, or turns crybaby again, or gets injured, enough.

RoadDawg55

They should have cut him. I don't think they want to admit they were wrong after paying a steep price to get him.

He's a good receiver, but the offense was better without him. He's expensive too. His money would be better served getting help for the OL or CB. He doesn't have any more guaranteed money owed.

ThomasFremont

RoadDawg55 said:

They should have cut him. I don't think they want to admit they were wrong after paying a steep price to get him.

He's a good receiver, but the offense was better without him. He's expensive too. His money would be better served getting help for the OL or CB. He doesn't have any more guaranteed money owed.

Another Percy Harvin type move. Should have cut ties as soon as the injury gave them a reasonable out.

But why bother investing in an OL to protect your franchise QB when you can have big name receivers!!1!

MisterEm

The rest of the 31 teams in the league would love for Bevell to force feed another expensive toy.

SteveInShelton

I have a hunch they want to cut him but can't, due to the probable injury settlement that would rape their butts. At best he'll start the season on the PUP list and be half the player he was, and at worst he will miss the season and essentially give Seattle a $9 million dead cap hit. He has zero trade value. It's a pretty fucked situation that will only hurt Seattle next season.

section_332

Jimmy is excuse 1 of the many 12s will point to when the Seahawks go 8-8 this year