Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Obama nominates Merrick Garland for SCOTUS

2

Comments

  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,688
    EwaDawg said:

    I'm pretty sure no one cares now or will remember after the Trump landslide

    The Donald is going to visit OSO? Fuckin' great. He deserves it.
    #TrumpStrong
  • doogsinparadisedoogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    Diversionary nominee, get ready for Obama in the court.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,688

    Diversionary nominee, get ready for Obama in the court.

    Yep, Obama is daring them not to confirm him.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,644 Standard Supporter
    dnc said:

    The Democrat nominates a center right judge and the GOP is going to stonewall him so Trump or Hillary can appoint someone far more liberal.

    Fucking idiots on both sides.

    Left wing judge. Doesn't think you should be able to own a gun. If he has a problem with the first ten of the bill of rights he's out in lefty field. God given inalienable rights. He and Obingo can kiss my ass! Tilts the whole court left, no balance and no right would be safe.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,644 Standard Supporter

    PurpleJ said:

    dnc said:

    The Democrat nominates a center right judge and the GOP is going to stonewall him so Trump or Hillary can appoint someone far more liberal.

    Fucking idiots on both sides.

    And idiots everywhere will tell congress to "do their job", when their job indicates that they have no obligation to confirm his nominee. EverybodyFS.
    If people really think that republicans are violating their role to advise and consent on a nomination according to the constitution, they should bring a case to the supreme court.
    I don't think anyone's arguing that what McDonnell and his gaggle of faggots are doing is unconstitutional. It's just bad politics symbolic of the shit that has given people like Trump so much support in the first place. Never before in our history has a nomination been stalled until a new president takes office.
    Hasn't been a supreme court justice appointed in a lame duck year in over 80 years. Obozo himself filibustered Alito. Dem's didn't want a Bush appointee with 2 years left in his term. Commie's always want you to do as they say not as they do!

    You read funny. They have taken action. They said hell no we ain't gonna do it! It's constitutional.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,644 Standard Supporter

    Sledog is the republican Hondo. I was going to say "your" republican Hondo but then I remembered that I too am a republican now.

    What happened you get mugged?
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Sledog is the republican Hondo. I was going to say "your" republican Hondo but then I remembered that I too am a republican now.

    Sledog is like 15 levels of fucktardedness higher than me.

    HTH
  • dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,233
    dnc said:

    Remember Robert Bork!


    ... precedent

    And also no. Bork is precedent for rejecting a nominee. He's not precedent for holding the spot hostage until a new president comes in. The Senate confirmed Kennedy after rejecting Bork.

    Try again.
    Don't ask her to try again or you'll just get more stupid bullshit to read.
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    Trump will negotiate this SC pick with the GOP Senate. Slam dunk. "Weebee Reconciled" will come from all corners of #teamtrump

    Were gonna run with 8 on the bench for awhile no matter how loud and annoying Obama becomes.
  • OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    edited March 2016

    I'm pretty sure no one cares now or will remember after the Trump landslide

    Even if you believe Trump beats Clinton in a one on one election, we won't have a one on one election. Far too many of the (R) establishment hate Trump and will put forward a 3rd party candidate, which will certainly give the win to Clinton (though I'm of the belief that Clinton beats Trump 1:1 anyway, even though I hate her).

    After she wins, she will nominate Obama for the supreme court.

    Obama knows the (R)s won't let his nomination during the lame duck year pass, so he put forward a guy that everybody likes, just to make the (R) establishment look like the clowns they are.
  • FenwickFenwick Member Posts: 1,174

    Why a white guy?

    Would you prefer a hispanic/black/asian, lesbian, third party nominee?
  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    You know why this post was flagged
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,448 Founders Club

    Sledog is the republican Hondo. I was going to say "your" republican Hondo but then I remembered that I too am a republican now.

    I'm a Trump Democrat
  • dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,233

    Sledog is the republican Hondo. I was going to say "your" republican Hondo but then I remembered that I too am a republican now.

    I'm a Trump Democrat
    You are than candidate that didn't run and deprived all of us of a candidate we could vote for.

    I'm pretty bitter about the whole thing, Bannon.
  • bananasnblondesbananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,239
    Sledog said:

    PurpleJ said:

    dnc said:

    The Democrat nominates a center right judge and the GOP is going to stonewall him so Trump or Hillary can appoint someone far more liberal.

    Fucking idiots on both sides.

    And idiots everywhere will tell congress to "do their job", when their job indicates that they have no obligation to confirm his nominee. EverybodyFS.
    If people really think that republicans are violating their role to advise and consent on a nomination according to the constitution, they should bring a case to the supreme court.
    I don't think anyone's arguing that what McDonnell and his gaggle of faggots are doing is unconstitutional. It's just bad politics symbolic of the shit that has given people like Trump so much support in the first place. Never before in our history has a nomination been stalled until a new president takes office.
    Hasn't been a supreme court justice appointed in a lame duck year in over 80 years. Obozo himself filibustered Alito. Dem's didn't want a Bush appointee with 2 years left in his term. Commie's always want you to do as they say not as they do!

    You read funny. They have taken action. They said hell no we ain't gonna do it! It's constitutional.
    That's right. I forgot about Alito. I wonder whatever happened to him after the dems blocked him from the supreme court for a year. I hope he found another job.

    R's are taking a pretty big chance here. If they block Garland, a relative moderate, and Hillary wins, the Dems may run a far left judge just to stick it up their ass
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,208 Founders Club

    Sledog is the republican Hondo. I was going to say "your" republican Hondo but then I remembered that I too am a republican now.

    I'm a proud patriot
    No need for political party labels here man. Trump is a uniter and every REAL patriot is welcome on the train.
  • allpurpleallgoldallpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771

    Sledog said:

    PurpleJ said:

    dnc said:

    The Democrat nominates a center right judge and the GOP is going to stonewall him so Trump or Hillary can appoint someone far more liberal.

    Fucking idiots on both sides.

    And idiots everywhere will tell congress to "do their job", when their job indicates that they have no obligation to confirm his nominee. EverybodyFS.
    If people really think that republicans are violating their role to advise and consent on a nomination according to the constitution, they should bring a case to the supreme court.
    I don't think anyone's arguing that what McDonnell and his gaggle of faggots are doing is unconstitutional. It's just bad politics symbolic of the shit that has given people like Trump so much support in the first place. Never before in our history has a nomination been stalled until a new president takes office.
    Hasn't been a supreme court justice appointed in a lame duck year in over 80 years. Obozo himself filibustered Alito. Dem's didn't want a Bush appointee with 2 years left in his term. Commie's always want you to do as they say not as they do!

    You read funny. They have taken action. They said hell no we ain't gonna do it! It's constitutional.
    That's right. I forgot about Alito. I wonder whatever happened to him after the dems blocked him from the supreme court for a year. I hope he found another job.

    R's are taking a pretty big chance here. If they block Garland, a relative moderate, and Hillary wins, the Dems may run a far left judge just to stick it up their ass
    Lol. Hillary isn't putting up a far left judge. Give me a break.
Sign In or Register to comment.