Obama nominates Merrick Garland for SCOTUS

allpurpleallgold

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V9MBUU0Tu3s

It's so disgusting that the left loves Obama.

PostGameOrangeSlices

who?

dnc

The Democrat nominates a center right judge and the GOP is going to stonewall him so Trump or Hillary can appoint someone far more liberal.

Fucking idiots on both sides.

RaceBannon

Why a white guy?

sarktastic

Why DC?

PurpleJ

dnc said:

The Democrat nominates a center right judge and the GOP is going to stonewall him so Trump or Hillary can appoint someone far more liberal.

Fucking idiots on both sides.

And idiots everywhere will tell congress to "do their job", when their job indicates that they have no obligation to confirm his nominee. EverybodyFS.

SpoonieLuv

Merrick Garland. Sounds Kenyan.

Swaye

I'm all for principled stands, but history says this backfires on the GOP like everything else they try to do and fuck up. What I have read says this guy is as right as you would ever get out of a Democrat president. Roll the dice with what happens in the future. GOP will get fucked. They always do. Idiots.

Hippopeteamus

PurpleJ said:

dnc said:

The Democrat nominates a center right judge and the GOP is going to stonewall him so Trump or Hillary can appoint someone far more liberal.

Fucking idiots on both sides.

And idiots everywhere will tell congress to "do their job", when their job indicates that they have no obligation to confirm his nominee. EverybodyFS.

If people really think that republicans are violating their role to advise and consent on a nomination according to the constitution, they should bring a case to the supreme court.

dnc

PurpleJ said:

dnc said:

The Democrat nominates a center right judge and the GOP is going to stonewall him so Trump or Hillary can appoint someone far more liberal.

Fucking idiots on both sides.

And idiots everywhere will tell congress to "do their job", when their job indicates that they have no obligation to confirm his nominee. EverybodyFS.

They have no obligation to confirm any specific nominee. The whole "let the people decide so we'll just put this thing on hold for 10 months" is bullshit though. The constitution gives them the authority to reject nominees on the basis of the nominee, not to reject nominees on the basis of who nominated them.

They all need to DIAFF.

sarktastic

Remember Robert Bork!


... precedent