ESPN Pumping Offseason Natty
Comments
-
This post isn't getting nearly enough attention. This fucktard is constantly wrong about football. If puppy thinks Peterman stinks we'll probably win the Pac-12 this year.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
No we dont. Pete cant recruit or coach. Heard it here 1st. Every Saturday for 26 odd weeks.wobidbus said:Scrolling through the ESPN Pac-12 blog, I'm noticing a lot of optimistic blurbs about UW's chances in 2016. No real groundbreaking insights, but I did find it interesting that 8 Pac-12 teams will be starting new QBs. With perhaps a weaker slate of offenses, can Death Row in 2016 be the best defense so far under Petersen? I know Stanford and Oregon are still strong at RB, but I'm actually looking forward to those games this year knowing that we for once have an even distribution of talent.
-
Whooshed by pupallpurpleallgold said:
This post isn't getting nearly enough attention. This fucktard is constantly wrong about football. If puppy thinks Peterman stinks we'll probably win the Pac-12 this year.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
No we dont. Pete cant recruit or coach. Heard it here 1st. Every Saturday for 26 odd weeks.wobidbus said:Scrolling through the ESPN Pac-12 blog, I'm noticing a lot of optimistic blurbs about UW's chances in 2016. No real groundbreaking insights, but I did find it interesting that 8 Pac-12 teams will be starting new QBs. With perhaps a weaker slate of offenses, can Death Row in 2016 be the best defense so far under Petersen? I know Stanford and Oregon are still strong at RB, but I'm actually looking forward to those games this year knowing that we for once have an even distribution of talent.
-
Sarcasm alert. I was mocking you fucks. Im the only one who's stood by Pete from day 1. BTW, 97/3 in case you forgot!allpurpleallgold said:
This post isn't getting nearly enough attention. This fucktard is constantly wrong about football. If puppy thinks Peterman stinks we'll probably win the Pac-12 this year.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
No we dont. Pete cant recruit or coach. Heard it here 1st. Every Saturday for 26 odd weeks.wobidbus said:Scrolling through the ESPN Pac-12 blog, I'm noticing a lot of optimistic blurbs about UW's chances in 2016. No real groundbreaking insights, but I did find it interesting that 8 Pac-12 teams will be starting new QBs. With perhaps a weaker slate of offenses, can Death Row in 2016 be the best defense so far under Petersen? I know Stanford and Oregon are still strong at RB, but I'm actually looking forward to those games this year knowing that we for once have an even distribution of talent.
-
Dammit. Oh well, we're fucked.
-
What do you expect from a J pupil?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Whooshed by pupallpurpleallgold said:
This post isn't getting nearly enough attention. This fucktard is constantly wrong about football. If puppy thinks Peterman stinks we'll probably win the Pac-12 this year.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
No we dont. Pete cant recruit or coach. Heard it here 1st. Every Saturday for 26 odd weeks.wobidbus said:Scrolling through the ESPN Pac-12 blog, I'm noticing a lot of optimistic blurbs about UW's chances in 2016. No real groundbreaking insights, but I did find it interesting that 8 Pac-12 teams will be starting new QBs. With perhaps a weaker slate of offenses, can Death Row in 2016 be the best defense so far under Petersen? I know Stanford and Oregon are still strong at RB, but I'm actually looking forward to those games this year knowing that we for once have an even distribution of talent.
-
White guilt LombardiDerekJohnson said:PostGameOrangeSlices said:Dennis_DeYoung said:We will find a way to 8-4.
Now that we have the two-time NATIONAL coach of the fucking YEAR coaching the DAWGS, and in his third year, there is absolutely no reason to expect mediocrity.
Or does Romar get that one?
Abundance?
Too soon?
GDIAF?
