Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Less Famous Puppyism on Sark

whatshouldicareaboutwhatshouldicareabout Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,949 Swaye's Wigwam
Sark will beat Petes meat by 21pts next year. And if Lindy is the qb in '16, the same will happen at home. Motivation is all good, but talent is the great equalizer.

After Kessler, A future 1st rounder in Max Browning steps in for '16, with 18 returning starters. SC is only going up. We are too, just at a slower pace. Like beating a dead horse with some of you. The QB situation is FUCKING DIRE. No way to sugarcoat it. Last year we had the WORST stable of QB'S in the cuntry.

Here's an experiment for the nerdy types like thomas who have nothing to add here. Do some research for the good of the group; find a team, 1 out of 126 remaing teams, who had a shittier stable of QB's than UW last year? Fast forward to '15....find another. Come on Thomas, show us your stuff.



Save this post ballbag then. Put your money where your cunt is. USC 42-UW 6 (21 was tongue-in-cheek)



Difference between what? 21-28 points? Game will be out of reach in 1st quarter. Nothing to do with Peetamus as a coach,or UW as a program, just way less talented (starting 22), much less experience and its on the road. Open your fucking eyes.

Give me one area UW will be better than SC besides kicking ? ONE besides "head" coaching? Listen, it will get very ugly, very quickly.

Roadie, maybe Fire Marshall (the only 2 guys with any football sense here) might be objective enough to see the reality, on a that soon-to-be frightful night in Cali .
«1

Comments

  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,659 Founders Club
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,515 Standard Supporter
    puppylove_sugarsteve strikes again
  • CFetters_Nacho_LoverCFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 31,056 Founders Club

    Sark will beat Petes meat by 21pts next year. And if Lindy is the qb in '16, the same will happen at home. Motivation is all good, but talent is the great equalizer.

    After Kessler, A future 1st rounder in Max Browning steps in for '16, with 18 returning starters. SC is only going up. We are too, just at a slower pace. Like beating a dead horse with some of you. The QB situation is FUCKING DIRE. No way to sugarcoat it. Last year we had the WORST stable of QB'S in the cuntry.

    Here's an experiment for the nerdy types like thomas who have nothing to add here. Do some research for the good of the group; find a team, 1 out of 126 remaing teams, who had a shittier stable of QB's than UW last year? Fast forward to '15....find another. Come on Thomas, show us your stuff.



    Save this post ballbag then. Put your money where your cunt is. USC 42-UW 6 (21 was tongue-in-cheek)



    Difference between what? 21-28 points? Game will be out of reach in 1st quarter. Nothing to do with Peetamus as a coach,or UW as a program, just way less talented (starting 22), much less experience and its on the road. Open your fucking eyes.

    Give me one area UW will be better than SC besides kicking ? ONE besides "head" coaching? Listen, it will get very ugly, very quickly.

    Roadie, maybe Fire Marshall (the only 2 guys with any football sense here) might be objective enough to see the reality, on a that soon-to-be frightful night in Cali .

    We need the original thread for this.
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,911 Swaye's Wigwam
  • whatshouldicareaboutwhatshouldicareabout Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,949 Swaye's Wigwam

    Sark will beat Petes meat by 21pts next year. And if Lindy is the qb in '16, the same will happen at home. Motivation is all good, but talent is the great equalizer.

    After Kessler, A future 1st rounder in Max Browning steps in for '16, with 18 returning starters. SC is only going up. We are too, just at a slower pace. Like beating a dead horse with some of you. The QB situation is FUCKING DIRE. No way to sugarcoat it. Last year we had the WORST stable of QB'S in the cuntry.

    Here's an experiment for the nerdy types like thomas who have nothing to add here. Do some research for the good of the group; find a team, 1 out of 126 remaing teams, who had a shittier stable of QB's than UW last year? Fast forward to '15....find another. Come on Thomas, show us your stuff.



    Save this post ballbag then. Put your money where your cunt is. USC 42-UW 6 (21 was tongue-in-cheek)



    Difference between what? 21-28 points? Game will be out of reach in 1st quarter. Nothing to do with Peetamus as a coach,or UW as a program, just way less talented (starting 22), much less experience and its on the road. Open your fucking eyes.

    Give me one area UW will be better than SC besides kicking ? ONE besides "head" coaching? Listen, it will get very ugly, very quickly.

    Roadie, maybe Fire Marshall (the only 2 guys with any football sense here) might be objective enough to see the reality, on a that soon-to-be frightful night in Cali .

    We need the original thread for this.
    We?
  • DooglesDoogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,640 Founders Club
    @puppylove_sugarsteel how are you planning on dodging this one?
  • MisterEmMisterEm Member Posts: 6,685

    Sark will beat Petes meat by 21pts next year. And if Lindy is the qb in '16, the same will happen at home. Motivation is all good, but talent is the great equalizer.

    After Kessler, A future 1st rounder in Max Browning steps in for '16, with 18 returning starters. SC is only going up. We are too, just at a slower pace. Like beating a dead horse with some of you. The QB situation is FUCKING DIRE. No way to sugarcoat it. Last year we had the WORST stable of QB'S in the cuntry.

    Here's an experiment for the nerdy types like thomas who have nothing to add here. Do some research for the good of the group; find a team, 1 out of 126 remaing teams, who had a shittier stable of QB's than UW last year? Fast forward to '15....find another. Come on Thomas, show us your stuff.



    Save this post ballbag then. Put your money where your cunt is. USC 42-UW 6 (21 was tongue-in-cheek)



    Difference between what? 21-28 points? Game will be out of reach in 1st quarter. Nothing to do with Peetamus as a coach,or UW as a program, just way less talented (starting 22), much less experience and its on the road. Open your fucking eyes.

    Give me one area UW will be better than SC besides kicking ? ONE besides "head" coaching? Listen, it will get very ugly, very quickly.

    Roadie, maybe Fire Marshall (the only 2 guys with any football sense here) might be objective enough to see the reality, on a that soon-to-be frightful night in Cali .

    Ok!
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,546 Founders Club
    Doogles said:

    @puppylove_sugarsteel how are you planning on dodging this one?

    He doesn't dodge. He swallows. HTH.
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133

    What is this about Lindy starting? Didn't Pumpy declare Browning the starter in 2015 as soon as Jake signed his LOI?

    I said "if Lindy starts we are dead meat". Clearly he didnt thus we didnt. Browning (who i clearly called to be the starter) got the nod and we won. Good thing pete listened to the email I sent him during spring ball
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,546 Founders Club
    AlCzervik said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Doogles said:

    @puppylove_sugarsteel how are you planning on dodging this one?

    He doesn't dodge. He swallows. HTH.
    Pumpy's silence in this thread speaks volumes.
    *gargle*
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    AlCzervik said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Doogles said:

    @puppylove_sugarsteel how are you planning on dodging this one?

    He doesn't dodge. He swallows. HTH.
    Pumpy's silence in this thread speaks volumes.
    Can you read new fish?
Sign In or Register to comment.