Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Doogin pretty hard over here

The 2016 version of the team is the most talented since atleast the 2000 RB squad. On the roster there are up to 20 + possible NFL players. On Offense: Adams, Browning, Daniels, Gaskin, McGary and Ross are locks barring injury etc.

On Defense: Baker, Gaines, Jones, King, Mathis, Qualls, Vea and Victor are also locks.

There are no RS or true frosh on the list, so no Potatoe, Mcgrew, Roberts, Wattenberg, Murphy etc. Also not included are some others that have a shot, guys like Pettis, Joyner, McClatcher, Gardenhire, Mcintosh, Dissly, Johnson etc.

Its weird having these feelings of excitement and I just hope Im not fucking myself but the talent on this team, and moving forward feels different and legitimate. I think Im gonna doog myself to sleep tonight.

«1

Comments

  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,911 Swaye's Wigwam
    Penace said:

    The 2016 version of the team is the most talented since atleast the 2000 RB squad. On the roster there are up to 20 + possible NFL players. On Offense: Adams, Browning, Daniels, Gaskin, McGary and Ross are locks barring injury etc.

    On Defense: Baker, Gaines, Jones, King, Mathis, Qualls, Vea and Victor are also locks.

    There are no RS or true frosh on the list, so no Potatoe, Mcgrew, Roberts, Wattenberg, Murphy etc. Also not included are some others that have a shot, guys like Pettis, Joyner, McClatcher, Gardenhire, Mcintosh, Dissly, Johnson etc.

    Its weird having these feelings of excitement and I just hope Im not fucking myself but the talent on this team, and moving forward feels different and legitimate. I think Im gonna doog myself to sleep tonight.


    Lol
  • jecorneljecornel Member Posts: 9,727
    Ross will be back.... Full go...he will have a big year.
  • SteveInSheltonSteveInShelton Member Posts: 1,611
    Not enough 4 star WR's, not enough flash, not enough zoom. I don't see it guys!
  • FreeChavezFreeChavez Member Posts: 3,223
    If browning can connect on more than 3% of his deep balls. That would also be a nice positive for next season.
  • HuskyJWHuskyJW Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,064 Swaye's Wigwam

    If browning can connect on more than 3% of his deep balls. That would also be a nice positive for next season.

    We have Ross....he can chase down those overthrows.
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    Penace said:

    The 2016 version of the team is the most talented since atleast the 2000 RB squad. On the roster there are up to 20 + possible NFL players. On Offense: Adams, Browning, Daniels, Gaskin, McGary and Ross are locks barring injury etc.

    On Defense: Baker, Gaines, Jones, King, Mathis, Qualls, Vea and Victor are also locks.

    There are no RS or true frosh on the list, so no Potatoe, Mcgrew, Roberts, Wattenberg, Murphy etc. Also not included are some others that have a shot, guys like Pettis, Joyner, McClatcher, Gardenhire, Mcintosh, Dissly, Johnson etc.

    Its weird having these feelings of excitement and I just hope Im not fucking myself but the talent on this team, and moving forward feels different and legitimate. I think Im gonna doog myself to sleep tonight.

    </blockquote

    slow your roll penace. Petersen should be fired remember? He only won 6 games with Miley. He had 4 1st round draft picks on defense, he should have won 10. Last year he should have won 11. He should have started Lindy , Pete kept jon smith at OC, should be accountable and fired. He should have taken a knee at Arizona instead of handing off to Cooper, fire him he cant coach. He should have started Lindy in C a ctus bowl, we are doomed he cant coach.

    You buttfuckers all have arthritis in the knees from jumping on off the Pete wagon. You flappy twats "chincredibling" this post are all guilty. Go jump on the seahawks wagon where you belong

  • doogsinparadisedoogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320

    Penace said:

    The 2016 version of the team is the most talented since atleast the 2000 RB squad. On the roster there are up to 20 + possible NFL players. On Offense: Adams, Browning, Daniels, Gaskin, McGary and Ross are locks barring injury etc.

    On Defense: Baker, Gaines, Jones, King, Mathis, Qualls, Vea and Victor are also locks.

    There are no RS or true frosh on the list, so no Potatoe, Mcgrew, Roberts, Wattenberg, Murphy etc. Also not included are some others that have a shot, guys like Pettis, Joyner, McClatcher, Gardenhire, Mcintosh, Dissly, Johnson etc.

    Its weird having these feelings of excitement and I just hope Im not fucking myself but the talent on this team, and moving forward feels different and legitimate. I think Im gonna doog myself to sleep tonight.

    You would fail logic, King Doog.
  • MisterEmMisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    chuck said:



    My 'if' list:

    1) If we've run enough early in the game to wear teams down for the fourth quarter (hardy har har)...
    2) If we've gotten good enough to make sure that in the 4th quarter a ball thrown into the hands of a LB is an INT instead of one of our fucktarded loser retards pounding his fists on the turf...
    3) If someone comes back to tie us, our playmakers on offense find a way to make big plays (see: Corndog Bowl)...
    4) If Browning stands in the pocket, makes plays with his feet and delivers accurate balls (and doesn't take sacks and throw the ball away) when we are behind late in games...

    Then we will be really fucking good. But none of that shit has to do with personnel and talent.

    Should have flagged for only four reasons.
    I will get that taken care of.
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,965
    jecornel said:

    Ross will be back.... Full go...he will have a big year.

    The idea that Ross will be a question mark healthy wise from a knee injury that will be almost 2 years old be the beginning of the season is laughable to me.

    Trust me, his athletic ability right now isn't indicative of a guy that is worried about a knee injury that he had.
  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,359 Swaye's Wigwam

    chuck said:



    My 'if' list:

    1) If we've run enough early in the game to wear teams down for the fourth quarter (hardy har har)...
    2) If we've gotten good enough to make sure that in the 4th quarter a ball thrown into the hands of a LB is an INT instead of one of our fucktarded loser retards pounding his fists on the turf...
    3) If someone comes back to tie us, our playmakers on offense find a way to make big plays (see: Corndog Bowl)...
    4) If Browning stands in the pocket, makes plays with his feet and delivers accurate balls (and doesn't take sacks and throw the ball away) when we are behind late in games...

    Then we will be really fucking good. But none of that shit has to do with personnel and talent.

    Should have flagged for only four reasons.
    Only a whiney little bitch 'flags' a post. Then again this place is infested with whiney little beeaatches.
    Simply chincredible. So innocent. So humorless. So lovable.
  • HeretoBeatmyChestHeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    @Dennis_DeYoung is right.

    On paper the talent + easy schedule is worth 9 wins. They need to develop that winning mentality to get to 10/11 wins and be a legit top 15 team that is in the national discussion.

    With the Seahawks you knew they had in 2012. They dont get tight in close games, they don't change if the other team comes back and they dont worry if they are way behind.

    This husky team has proven they can come back and I think they will have more confidence this season that they can close the deal. But can they hold onto leads in close games? Totally blew it against ASU then almost blew it in the bowl game. Holding on there was a small step if anything. What worries me is their ability to close tight games against Stanford, Oregon, USC, ASU. That is what will define the season. They will have a handful of close games and if they can go 2-2 or 3-2 in those then it will be a successful season. If they go 1-3 or 1-4 then it wont be a successful season.
  • Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754

    @Dennis_DeYoung is right.

    On paper the talent + easy schedule is worth 9 wins. They need to develop that winning mentality to get to 10/11 wins and be a legit top 15 team that is in the national discussion.

    With the Seahawks you knew they had in 2012. They dont get tight in close games, they don't change if the other team comes back and they dont worry if they are way behind.

    This husky team has proven they can come back and I think they will have more confidence this season that they can close the deal. But can they hold onto leads in close games? Totally blew it against ASU then almost blew it in the bowl game. Holding on there was a small step if anything. What worries me is their ability to close tight games against Stanford, Oregon, USC, ASU. That is what will define the season. They will have a handful of close games and if they can go 2-2 or 3-2 in those then it will be a successful season. If they go 1-3 or 1-4 then it wont be a successful season.

    Would you mind telling this to my ex-wife?!?
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,892
    20 NFL players.




    Kreist to bed.
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,546 Founders Club
    Why was puppy's gem removed? Mods?
Sign In or Register to comment.