Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Doogin pretty hard over here

2»

Comments

  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,515 Standard Supporter

    NEsnake12 said:

    Personally, the only UW guys who have played consistently well enough to be deemed "locks" are Jones, Baker, Victor, and Qualls. As in all 4 of those guys will get drafted, barring any injuries or ridiculous declines.

    The majority of the guys who you've listed are based on where we optimistically expect them to be in a few years. Browning, Adams, McGary, Gaines, Vea all have only played one year as freshmen and while they all looked promising, they need to actually make the necessary improvements before we can start calling them NFL locks.

    The seniors you mentioned in Daniels, Mathis, and King are all NFL-level athletes but they need some work before they get serious consideration. Mathis and Daniels are both tweeners size-wise and need to establish what clear cut position that they can play at the pro level, then train their bodies accordingly. King just needs to finally figure out how to size up, which I don't even know if he's capable of.

    Ross coming back as his old self after the knee surgery is no guarantee. If he can come back though, then he's an instant lock because of his speed, regardless of unpolished route running.

    Gaskin just needs to have consistent production in the next few years while steadily improving. He doesn't have prototypical NFL size or speed, which is the only reason he isn't a lock already. But if he can have a college career like Ka'Deem Carey or Stepfan Taylor, he'll probably wind up drafted in the 3rd or 4th round to be used as a reliable depth option.

    Listen new fish, you ignorant cunt. Dont crawl over here from kims corral and spew rubbish in hopes of sounding edumacated. Qualls hasnt done anything to be considered a "lock", and the other 3 are water wet.

    Adams is the best NFL talent on the whole roster so yes he is a lock. Did you watch him pancake every guy he faced last year? As a zit faced true freshman? Wai t till he discovers a weight room.

    Mathis is so far from NFL material it hurts to carry his scholly, Daniels has the hands of girls basketball player so i dont think either are going to the league there mr NFL GM. Kinv was the best corner on the field at times, and at legit 6-3 will get drafted no problem. His anticipation and ball skills blew even me away (he was the biggest pussy this program ever had a t safety, but it made him a good corner)

    Ross is so fluid he could come back at 80% and be the best weapon on offense next to Gaskin. So reading into that is silly. Gaines was the best interior dlineman on the field last year, wtf are you talking about. He is a bull rusher, incredibly natural strong, very hard to handle 1 on 1 as a fucking pudgy freshman. Again, wait till he finds a weight room.

    Now my favorite fuckup of yours, Gaskin. Carey and Taylor? WTF kind of comparisons are those. Totally different backs, different sizes. If you used Quiz Rodgers i would have at least raised my eyebrow a little. Gaskin is the best freshman back since kaufman, and will shatter his record. Yes Gaskin has NFL speed and who cares if he has nfl size, he needs to be great at UW. And how does he "steadily need to improve?" He's already great butthuff.

    This isnt dawgman. You dont get away with saying shit unchallenged at HH. Kim isnt here to protect your dumbass. Lurke a little as we say...then chinpost. Heehee, see I made an HH joke
    Chinsightful
  • section_332section_332 Member Posts: 2,403
    Chin it up!!! Chin it up!!!
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    PurpleJ said:

    Why was puppy's gem removed? Mods?

    Because johnb, PDF, dawgnews have moved over to HH? Any puppy post removed is like throwing the front page and sports section of the Seattle Times away and asking the public to buy and/or read it. Keep it up. Hits sell ads. Ads dont come by Tommy's riveting threads.
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,659 Founders Club
    Did Puppy post simulated sex acts or nerdy anime?
  • PurpleBazePurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,085 Founders Club

    Did Puppy post simulated sex acts or nerdy anime?

    Must have posted a picture of a girl eating a sandwich.
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,515 Standard Supporter

    Did Puppy post simulated sex acts or nerdy anime?

    A close up of an ejaculating penis is more puppy's speed. Go figure.
  • NEsnake12NEsnake12 Member Posts: 3,792

    NEsnake12 said:

    Personally, the only UW guys who have played consistently well enough to be deemed "locks" are Jones, Baker, Victor, and Qualls. As in all 4 of those guys will get drafted, barring any injuries or ridiculous declines.

    The majority of the guys who you've listed are based on where we optimistically expect them to be in a few years. Browning, Adams, McGary, Gaines, Vea all have only played one year as freshmen and while they all looked promising, they need to actually make the necessary improvements before we can start calling them NFL locks.

    The seniors you mentioned in Daniels, Mathis, and King are all NFL-level athletes but they need some work before they get serious consideration. Mathis and Daniels are both tweeners size-wise and need to establish what clear cut position that they can play at the pro level, then train their bodies accordingly. King just needs to finally figure out how to size up, which I don't even know if he's capable of.

    Ross coming back as his old self after the knee surgery is no guarantee. If he can come back though, then he's an instant lock because of his speed, regardless of unpolished route running.

    Gaskin just needs to have consistent production in the next few years while steadily improving. He doesn't have prototypical NFL size or speed, which is the only reason he isn't a lock already. But if he can have a college career like Ka'Deem Carey or Stepfan Taylor, he'll probably wind up drafted in the 3rd or 4th round to be used as a reliable depth option.

    Listen new fish, you ignorant cunt. Dont crawl over here from kims corral and spew rubbish in hopes of sounding edumacated. Qualls hasnt done anything to be considered a "lock", and the other 3 are water wet.

    Adams is the best NFL talent on the whole roster so yes he is a lock. Did you watch him pancake every guy he faced last year? As a zit faced true freshman? Wai t till he discovers a weight room.

    Mathis is so far from NFL material it hurts to carry his scholly, Daniels has the hands of girls basketball player so i dont think either are going to the league there mr NFL GM. Kinv was the best corner on the field at times, and at legit 6-3 will get drafted no problem. His anticipation and ball skills blew even me away (he was the biggest pussy this program ever had a t safety, but it made him a good corner)

    Ross is so fluid he could come back at 80% and be the best weapon on offense next to Gaskin. So reading into that is silly. Gaines was the best interior dlineman on the field last year, wtf are you talking about. He is a bull rusher, incredibly natural strong, very hard to handle 1 on 1 as a fucking pudgy freshman. Again, wait till he finds a weight room.

    Now my favorite fuckup of yours, Gaskin. Carey and Taylor? WTF kind of comparisons are those. Totally different backs, different sizes. If you used Quiz Rodgers i would have at least raised my eyebrow a little. Gaskin is the best freshman back since kaufman, and will shatter his record. Yes Gaskin has NFL speed and who cares if he has nfl size, he needs to be great at UW. And how does he "steadily need to improve?" He's already great butthuff.

    This isnt dawgman. You dont get away with saying shit unchallenged at HH. Kim isnt here to protect your dumbass. Lurke a little as we say...then chinpost. Heehee, see I made an HH joke
    Gaskin is literally the same exact size as Carey, both came out of high school at 5'9 185 and by the time Gaskin is done here he'll be around Carey's size of around 205-210. Taylor is just an inch taller. The comparison was more for being all shorter backs who were productive workhorses (as opposed to the 230 lb Royce Freemans and the 6'3 Derrick Henrys out there). And yes he needs to steadily improve despite the fact that he was already insanely good as a true freshman. He was one dimensional last year with only 1 catch for 3 yards on the whole season, so obviously some improvement there would help because NFL teams covet versatility in the current pass happy era. Rest of your points can be arguable but what the actual fuck are you talking about here.

    And FWIW never read dawgman, let alone paid for it, and been lurking here since the 2014 season.
  • CFetters_Nacho_LoverCFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 31,056 Founders Club
    PurpleJ said:

    Why was puppy's gem removed? Mods?

    Huh?
  • CFetters_Nacho_LoverCFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 31,056 Founders Club

    NEsnake12 said:

    Personally, the only UW guys who have played consistently well enough to be deemed "locks" are Jones, Baker, Victor, and Qualls. As in all 4 of those guys will get drafted, barring any injuries or ridiculous declines.

    The majority of the guys who you've listed are based on where we optimistically expect them to be in a few years. Browning, Adams, McGary, Gaines, Vea all have only played one year as freshmen and while they all looked promising, they need to actually make the necessary improvements before we can start calling them NFL locks.

    The seniors you mentioned in Daniels, Mathis, and King are all NFL-level athletes but they need some work before they get serious consideration. Mathis and Daniels are both tweeners size-wise and need to establish what clear cut position that they can play at the pro level, then train their bodies accordingly. King just needs to finally figure out how to size up, which I don't even know if he's capable of.

    Ross coming back as his old self after the knee surgery is no guarantee. If he can come back though, then he's an instant lock because of his speed, regardless of unpolished route running.

    Gaskin just needs to have consistent production in the next few years while steadily improving. He doesn't have prototypical NFL size or speed, which is the only reason he isn't a lock already. But if he can have a college career like Ka'Deem Carey or Stepfan Taylor, he'll probably wind up drafted in the 3rd or 4th round to be used as a reliable depth option.

    Listen new fish, you ignorant cunt. Dont crawl over here from kims corral and spew rubbish in hopes of sounding edumacated. Qualls hasnt done anything to be considered a "lock", and the other 3 are water wet.

    Adams is the best NFL talent on the whole roster so yes he is a lock. Did you watch him pancake every guy he faced last year? As a zit faced true freshman? Wai t till he discovers a weight room.

    Mathis is so far from NFL material it hurts to carry his scholly, Daniels has the hands of girls basketball player so i dont think either are going to the league there mr NFL GM. Kinv was the best corner on the field at times, and at legit 6-3 will get drafted no problem. His anticipation and ball skills blew even me away (he was the biggest pussy this program ever had a t safety, but it made him a good corner)

    Ross is so fluid he could come back at 80% and be the best weapon on offense next to Gaskin. So reading into that is silly. Gaines was the best interior dlineman on the field last year, wtf are you talking about. He is a bull rusher, incredibly natural strong, very hard to handle 1 on 1 as a fucking pudgy freshman. Again, wait till he finds a weight room.

    Now my favorite fuckup of yours, Gaskin. Carey and Taylor? WTF kind of comparisons are those. Totally different backs, different sizes. If you used Quiz Rodgers i would have at least raised my eyebrow a little. Gaskin is the best freshman back since kaufman, and will shatter his record. Yes Gaskin has NFL speed and who cares if he has nfl size, he needs to be great at UW. And how does he "steadily need to improve?" He's already great butthuff.

    This isnt dawgman. You dont get away with saying shit unchallenged at HH. Kim isnt here to protect your dumbass. Lurke a little as we say...then chinpost. Heehee, see I made an HH joke
    Puppy good at everything.
  • HouhuskyHouhusky Member Posts: 5,537

    Chin chin chin chin hee hee . Dawgman is chinning it up now. Chin Grinolds haha. Edit: Fetters has a double chin : kim has no chin, can I call an asian a chin
    ? Edit: Chin-a isnt promoting fair trade. Gimmie a Chin and tonic hardy. Chin me, tommy, what do guys think of your forchin? Puppy made a chinfunny.

    Surprisingly this is the most chinpactful and chintelligible post you have ever made.
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    PurpleJ said:

    Why was puppy's gem removed? Mods?

    Because johnb, PDF, dawgnews have moved over to HH? Any puppy post removed is like throwing the front page and sports section of the Seattle Times away and asking the public to buy and/or read it. Keep it up. Hits sell ads. Ads dont come by Tommy's riveting threads.
    FREE PUB!!1!
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    PurpleJ said:

    Chintervention: Maltby Nights

    I can't believe this wasn't appreciated more.
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133

    Did Puppy post simulated sex acts or nerdy anime?

    A close up of an ejaculating penis is more puppy's speed. Go figure.
    Puppy got banned for that. The hypocrisy. Everyone of you turds were squirting on the screen when I posted that. Guess adults cant view that stuff though. Derek? Porn is one thing I get it, but porn used for comedic value is different. Its ok for porn gif's, but god forbid grown adults see a nipple. Oh no, golly gee how dare god put tits cunts and balls on us. Too taboo for adults to see I guess.

    Dawgman could use porn now, the higher discussion route obviously has failed.
    NEsnake12 said:

    NEsnake12 said:

    Personally, the only UW guys who have played consistently well enough to be deemed "locks" are Jones, Baker, Victor, and Qualls. As in all 4 of those guys will get drafted, barring any injuries or ridiculous declines.

    The majority of the guys who you've listed are based on where we optimistically expect them to be in a few years. Browning, Adams, McGary, Gaines, Vea all have only played one year as freshmen and while they all looked promising, they need to actually make the necessary improvements before we can start calling them NFL locks.

    The seniors you mentioned in Daniels, Mathis, and King are all NFL-level athletes but they need some work before they get serious consideration. Mathis and Daniels are both tweeners size-wise and need to establish what clear cut position that they can play at the pro level, then train their bodies accordingly. King just needs to finally figure out how to size up, which I don't even know if he's capable of.

    Ross coming back as his old self after the knee surgery is no guarantee. If he can come back though, then he's an instant lock because of his speed, regardless of unpolished route running.

    Gaskin just needs to have consistent production in the next few years while steadily improving. He doesn't have prototypical NFL size or speed, which is the only reason he isn't a lock already. But if he can have a college career like Ka'Deem Carey or Stepfan Taylor, he'll probably wind up drafted in the 3rd or 4th round to be used as a reliable depth option.

    Listen new fish, you ignorant cunt. Dont crawl over here from kims corral and spew rubbish in hopes of sounding edumacated. Qualls hasnt done anything to be considered a "lock", and the other 3 are water wet.

    Adams is the best NFL talent on the whole roster so yes he is a lock. Did you watch him pancake every guy he faced last year? As a zit faced true freshman? Wai t till he discovers a weight room.

    Mathis is so far from NFL material it hurts to carry his scholly, Daniels has the hands of girls basketball player so i dont think either are going to the league there mr NFL GM. Kinv was the best corner on the field at times, and at legit 6-3 will get drafted no problem. His anticipation and ball skills blew even me away (he was the biggest pussy this program ever had a t safety, but it made him a good corner)

    Ross is so fluid he could come back at 80% and be the best weapon on offense next to Gaskin. So reading into that is silly. Gaines was the best interior dlineman on the field last year, wtf are you talking about. He is a bull rusher, incredibly natural strong, very hard to handle 1 on 1 as a fucking pudgy freshman. Again, wait till he finds a weight room.

    Now my favorite fuckup of yours, Gaskin. Carey and Taylor? WTF kind of comparisons are those. Totally different backs, different sizes. If you used Quiz Rodgers i would have at least raised my eyebrow a little. Gaskin is the best freshman back since kaufman, and will shatter his record. Yes Gaskin has NFL speed and who cares if he has nfl size, he needs to be great at UW. And how does he "steadily need to improve?" He's already great butthuff.

    This isnt dawgman. You dont get away with saying shit unchallenged at HH. Kim isnt here to protect your dumbass. Lurke a little as we say...then chinpost. Heehee, see I made an HH joke
    Gaskin is literally the same exact size as Carey, both came out of high school at 5'9 185 and by the time Gaskin is done here he'll be around Carey's size of around 205-210. Taylor is just an inch taller. The comparison was more for being all shorter backs who were productive workhorses (as opposed to the 230 lb Royce Freemans and the 6'3 Derrick Henrys out there). And yes he needs to steadily improve despite the fact that he was already insanely good as a true freshman. He was one dimensional last year with only 1 catch for 3 yards on the whole season, so obviously some improvement there would help because NFL teams covet versatility in the current pass happy era. Rest of your points can be arguable but what the actual fuck are you talking about here.

    And FWIW never read dawgman, let alone paid for it, and been lurking here since the 2014 season.
    Again quiz is a better comparison. Gaskin listed at 5-9 190. Hes not even. Different builds. And Gaskin doesnt have build or frame to pack 210. He''s narrow, small and not stout like carey. Like saying kaufman would pack 210. Doesnt have the frame.
Sign In or Register to comment.