Yes, but there has been times when a player is released if the coach is let go and allowed to leave.
And why should I care about that?
Why should 17-18 year old kids dictate what grown ups be doing?
Then why bring up the LOI?
If Romar goes Fultz will get out of his LOI. If you think Romar should go regardless I agree, but Fultz's LOI means nothing.
Purely for those saying that Fultz is guaranteed to leave if Romar leaves.
He may ... but he's also already signed his LOI. We don't have to let him out of it. We can be nice and do so ... but we hold the leverage on it ... not Fultz.
And as has been stated ad nauseam, the right coach matters 1000x more anyway.
Go look around the country at the number of "basketball schools" ... the thing you'll notice with them all is that it is tied to the quality of the coach.
Nobody holds kids to their LOIs when a coach is canned. If Romar is gone, Fultz will be too.
I don't agree he's gone at all. I think they would let him out of his LOI, but that given the right hire Fultz would still come to UW for what the team has coming back. If UW hired a good coach, and held onto one of chriss/murray and possibly both, you're telling me that fultz is just going to run away from that based on romar. I don't buy it.
Still think the guy wants to be a husky and would show up unless they hired someone like camron dollar.
And I also think that whomever is hired at uw would be insane to get rid of Will. Conroy should be kept on regardless of who is hired.
He didn't pick UW for Murray/Chriss, he picked UW for Romar. An absolute home run hire might get him to stay, but we all know we're not making one of those for hoops.
I know this is fishing @Tequilla but gregg marshall is going to have to take a serious look around after this year. Both his studs leave and if someone like UW could write a nice sized check he'd have enough clout recently to hold onto a guy like fultz possibly.
Obviously i'm an archie miller fan but i don't know how he goes midwest to pac12 other than the brotherly link.
Why does Greg Marshall need "to take a look around"? If He was interested in upward mobility, He would have been gone 3 Seasons ago.
It is becoming harder and harder to compete in non power five conferences. It will continue over the next five years. He doesn't have a great class of kids after the current seniors which is why he didn't leave three years ago. He wanted to see this class to their senior year and he was proved right on its talent. Nobody is saying he leaves for sure. It just wouldn't shock me that a power 5 school pays him just like shacka left.
I did a statistical analysis of all the power 5 conferences coaches who've missed the tourney (soon to be) 5 years in a row and have been at a school for 10 plus years in doing so.
There was one, and you'll never guess who it was......
He's going to be here next year, but it will be a tourney or bust scenario.
Comments
And you fags flagged my "Romar-to-AD" post into oblivion...
There was one, and you'll never guess who it was......
He's going to be here next year, but it will be a tourney or bust scenario.