Pac 12 Non-Conference Schedules for 2016 (J. Wilner)
Comments
-
Agree, but when the playoff eventually expands to 8, SOS will matter more.RoadDawg55 said:
I hate it, but this is true. All the talk about SOS is a bunch of mumbo jumbo. A two loss team with the toughest schedule in the country still isn't getting in over a one loss team. That is especially true for UW. Maybe a blueblood could get in over TCU or Baylor in that scenario. I doubt it, but maybe.HuskyJW said:I could really care less about OOC games
Win the Pac 12 and your OOC games and you're in the playoff. Stanford beats Northwestern they would have been in I think.
The only benefit to playing difficult OOC games is for the season ticket holders so we don't think we are being completely raped.
-
This is why I firmly believe you need to get the 4 teams up to 8. Allow for the conference champions and then a handful of at larges.RoadDawg55 said:
I hate it, but this is true. All the talk about SOS is a bunch of mumbo jumbo. A two loss team with the toughest schedule in the country still isn't getting in over a one loss team. That is especially true for UW. Maybe a blueblood could get in over TCU or Baylor in that scenario. I doubt it, but maybe.HuskyJW said:I could really care less about OOC games
Win the Pac 12 and your OOC games and you're in the playoff. Stanford beats Northwestern they would have been in I think.
The only benefit to playing difficult OOC games is for the season ticket holders so we don't think we are being completely raped. -
$20 Svens at the 7-11 Punk.PurpleBaze said:
How about the cuogs? I predict you guys get seriously ass-raped in the Apple Cup again.salemcoog said:House Money has you guys locked in the Heart of Dallas again with a possible upgrade to Vegas.
-
Who didn't get in that should have these last 2 Seasons?Tequilla said:
This is why I firmly believe you need to get the 4 teams up to 8. Allow for the conference champions and then a handful of at larges.RoadDawg55 said:
I hate it, but this is true. All the talk about SOS is a bunch of mumbo jumbo. A two loss team with the toughest schedule in the country still isn't getting in over a one loss team. That is especially true for UW. Maybe a blueblood could get in over TCU or Baylor in that scenario. I doubt it, but maybe.HuskyJW said:I could really care less about OOC games
Win the Pac 12 and your OOC games and you're in the playoff. Stanford beats Northwestern they would have been in I think.
The only benefit to playing difficult OOC games is for the season ticket holders so we don't think we are being completely raped.
Axeing for a fren. -
Stanford won the PAC this year ... probably better than Michigan State. Ohio State laid an egg in a game ... probably worth being in the picture. If Ole Miss didn't have a late season 1 point loss to Arkansas, it's possible that Alabama would have been left out.
I'm not convinced that TCU/Baylor last year should have been in ahead of any other team (although I do think that TCU was very deserving of a spot), I don't think that there was enough evidence to suggest that they were any less deserving of somebody else.
As parity becomes a larger piece of the puzzle, it's going to become even more painful trying to separate teams. -
The third place team in the pac 12 norte this yearsalemcoog said:
Who didn't get in that should have these last 2 Seasons?Tequilla said:
This is why I firmly believe you need to get the 4 teams up to 8. Allow for the conference champions and then a handful of at larges.RoadDawg55 said:
I hate it, but this is true. All the talk about SOS is a bunch of mumbo jumbo. A two loss team with the toughest schedule in the country still isn't getting in over a one loss team. That is especially true for UW. Maybe a blueblood could get in over TCU or Baylor in that scenario. I doubt it, but maybe.HuskyJW said:I could really care less about OOC games
Win the Pac 12 and your OOC games and you're in the playoff. Stanford beats Northwestern they would have been in I think.
The only benefit to playing difficult OOC games is for the season ticket holders so we don't think we are being completely raped.
Axeing for a fren. -
I like 6 with the top 2 getting byes.BallSacked said:
Agree, but when the playoff eventually expands to 8, SOS will matter more.RoadDawg55 said:
I hate it, but this is true. All the talk about SOS is a bunch of mumbo jumbo. A two loss team with the toughest schedule in the country still isn't getting in over a one loss team. That is especially true for UW. Maybe a blueblood could get in over TCU or Baylor in that scenario. I doubt it, but maybe.HuskyJW said:I could really care less about OOC games
Win the Pac 12 and your OOC games and you're in the playoff. Stanford beats Northwestern they would have been in I think.
The only benefit to playing difficult OOC games is for the season ticket holders so we don't think we are being completely raped.
Just me though. -
Unfortunately they haven't added the internet poll option.RaceBannon said:
The third place team in the pac 12 norte this yearsalemcoog said:
Who didn't get in that should have these last 2 Seasons?Tequilla said:
This is why I firmly believe you need to get the 4 teams up to 8. Allow for the conference champions and then a handful of at larges.RoadDawg55 said:
I hate it, but this is true. All the talk about SOS is a bunch of mumbo jumbo. A two loss team with the toughest schedule in the country still isn't getting in over a one loss team. That is especially true for UW. Maybe a blueblood could get in over TCU or Baylor in that scenario. I doubt it, but maybe.HuskyJW said:I could really care less about OOC games
Win the Pac 12 and your OOC games and you're in the playoff. Stanford beats Northwestern they would have been in I think.
The only benefit to playing difficult OOC games is for the season ticket holders so we don't think we are being completely raped.
Axeing for a fren.
Yet. -
Your favorite AD Pool Boy and HC Sark are the ones that fought for these changes.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Don James believed in an ABC schedule. This is a CFF scheduleDerekJohnson said:
Don James said that it was important to play at least one tough OOC opponent to prepare his team for the conference season.HuskyJW said:I could really care less about OOC games
Win the Pac 12 and your OOC games and you're in the playoff. Stanford beats Northwestern they would have been in I think.
The only benefit to playing difficult OOC games is for the season ticket holders so we don't think we are being completely raped.
This is what happens when fucktards like you support losers. -
@Passion??!!?? True??!!?!!11!!??EsophagealFeces said:
You must be knew. Everyone knows that the formula is push up the middle and heat from the edge.BallSacked said:On the flip side - it's really FS to play two OOC road games against teams like BYU and A&M.
Play one TUFF OOC, and then dreck. That's the formula.
