Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Pac 12 Non-Conference Schedules for 2016 (J. Wilner)

MeekMeek Member Posts: 7,031
in Hardcore Husky Board
quick analysis by the objective Jon Wilner (Merc News) about each Pac 12 team's non-conf schedule next year.

the interesting part (to me, anyway) is the handful of comments. It's a Bay Area publication and most of the comments are from embarrassed Husky fans who feel our? non-conf schedule is a joke to the tradition of Husky football. Pool Boy's legacy and Sark's demands to play the easiest schedule possible. Fuck those guys.

blogs.mercurynews.com/collegesports/2016/01/28/pac-12-football-the-noncon-skeds/
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • HuskyJWHuskyJW Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,064 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited February 2016
    I could really care less about OOC games

    Win the Pac 12 and your OOC games and you're in the playoff. Stanford beats Northwestern they would have been in I think.

    The only benefit to playing difficult OOC games is for the season ticket holders so we don't think we are being completely raped.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 64,941 Founders Club
    HuskyJW said:

    I could really care less about OOC games

    Win the Pac 12 and your OOC games and you're in the playoff. Stanford beats Northwestern they would have been in I think.

    The only benefit to playing difficult OOC games is for the season ticket holders so we don't think we are being completely raped.

    Don James said that it was important to play at least one tough OOC opponent to prepare his team for the conference season.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BallSackedBallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    On the flip side - it's really FS to play two OOC road games against teams like BYU and A&M.

    Play one TUFF OOC, and then dreck. That's the formula.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • EsophagealFecesEsophagealFeces Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,480 Swaye's Wigwam
    BallSacked said:

    On the flip side - it's really FS to play two OOC road games against teams like BYU and A&M.

    Play one TUFF OOC, and then dreck. That's the formula.

    You must be knew. Everyone knows that the formula is push up the middle and heat from the edge.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MisterEmMisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    Poolboy and Cutty strike again.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • IrishDawg22IrishDawg22 Member Posts: 2,754
    Wilner is your source??
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    DerekJohnson said:

    HuskyJW said:

    I could really care less about OOC games

    Win the Pac 12 and your OOC games and you're in the playoff. Stanford beats Northwestern they would have been in I think.

    The only benefit to playing difficult OOC games is for the season ticket holders so we don't think we are being completely raped.

    Don James said that it was important to play at least one tough OOC opponent to prepare his team for the conference season.
    Don James believed in an ABC schedule. This is a CFF schedule
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,892
    House Money has you guys locked in the Heart of Dallas again with a possible upgrade to Vegas.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BallSackedBallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    RoadDawg55 said:

    HuskyJW said:

    I could really care less about OOC games

    Win the Pac 12 and your OOC games and you're in the playoff. Stanford beats Northwestern they would have been in I think.

    The only benefit to playing difficult OOC games is for the season ticket holders so we don't think we are being completely raped.

    I hate it, but this is true. All the talk about SOS is a bunch of mumbo jumbo. A two loss team with the toughest schedule in the country still isn't getting in over a one loss team. That is especially true for UW. Maybe a blueblood could get in over TCU or Baylor in that scenario. I doubt it, but maybe.
    Agree, but when the playoff eventually expands to 8, SOS will matter more.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,965
    RoadDawg55 said:

    HuskyJW said:

    I could really care less about OOC games

    Win the Pac 12 and your OOC games and you're in the playoff. Stanford beats Northwestern they would have been in I think.

    The only benefit to playing difficult OOC games is for the season ticket holders so we don't think we are being completely raped.

    I hate it, but this is true. All the talk about SOS is a bunch of mumbo jumbo. A two loss team with the toughest schedule in the country still isn't getting in over a one loss team. That is especially true for UW. Maybe a blueblood could get in over TCU or Baylor in that scenario. I doubt it, but maybe.
    This is why I firmly believe you need to get the 4 teams up to 8. Allow for the conference champions and then a handful of at larges.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,892
    PurpleBaze said:

    salemcoog said:

    House Money has you guys locked in the Heart of Dallas again with a possible upgrade to Vegas.

    How about the cuogs? I predict you guys get seriously ass-raped in the Apple Cup again.
    $20 Svens at the 7-11 Punk.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,892
    Tequilla said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    HuskyJW said:

    I could really care less about OOC games

    Win the Pac 12 and your OOC games and you're in the playoff. Stanford beats Northwestern they would have been in I think.

    The only benefit to playing difficult OOC games is for the season ticket holders so we don't think we are being completely raped.

    I hate it, but this is true. All the talk about SOS is a bunch of mumbo jumbo. A two loss team with the toughest schedule in the country still isn't getting in over a one loss team. That is especially true for UW. Maybe a blueblood could get in over TCU or Baylor in that scenario. I doubt it, but maybe.
    This is why I firmly believe you need to get the 4 teams up to 8. Allow for the conference champions and then a handful of at larges.
    Who didn't get in that should have these last 2 Seasons?

    Axeing for a fren.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,965
    Stanford won the PAC this year ... probably better than Michigan State. Ohio State laid an egg in a game ... probably worth being in the picture. If Ole Miss didn't have a late season 1 point loss to Arkansas, it's possible that Alabama would have been left out.

    I'm not convinced that TCU/Baylor last year should have been in ahead of any other team (although I do think that TCU was very deserving of a spot), I don't think that there was enough evidence to suggest that they were any less deserving of somebody else.

    As parity becomes a larger piece of the puzzle, it's going to become even more painful trying to separate teams.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 108,499 Founders Club
    salemcoog said:

    Tequilla said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    HuskyJW said:

    I could really care less about OOC games

    Win the Pac 12 and your OOC games and you're in the playoff. Stanford beats Northwestern they would have been in I think.

    The only benefit to playing difficult OOC games is for the season ticket holders so we don't think we are being completely raped.

    I hate it, but this is true. All the talk about SOS is a bunch of mumbo jumbo. A two loss team with the toughest schedule in the country still isn't getting in over a one loss team. That is especially true for UW. Maybe a blueblood could get in over TCU or Baylor in that scenario. I doubt it, but maybe.
    This is why I firmly believe you need to get the 4 teams up to 8. Allow for the conference champions and then a handful of at larges.
    Who didn't get in that should have these last 2 Seasons?

    Axeing for a fren.
    The third place team in the pac 12 norte this year
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HuskyJWHuskyJW Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,064 Swaye's Wigwam
    BallSacked said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    HuskyJW said:

    I could really care less about OOC games

    Win the Pac 12 and your OOC games and you're in the playoff. Stanford beats Northwestern they would have been in I think.

    The only benefit to playing difficult OOC games is for the season ticket holders so we don't think we are being completely raped.

    I hate it, but this is true. All the talk about SOS is a bunch of mumbo jumbo. A two loss team with the toughest schedule in the country still isn't getting in over a one loss team. That is especially true for UW. Maybe a blueblood could get in over TCU or Baylor in that scenario. I doubt it, but maybe.
    Agree, but when the playoff eventually expands to 8, SOS will matter more.
    I like 6 with the top 2 getting byes.

    Just me though.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,892
    RaceBannon said:

    salemcoog said:

    Tequilla said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    HuskyJW said:

    I could really care less about OOC games

    Win the Pac 12 and your OOC games and you're in the playoff. Stanford beats Northwestern they would have been in I think.

    The only benefit to playing difficult OOC games is for the season ticket holders so we don't think we are being completely raped.

    I hate it, but this is true. All the talk about SOS is a bunch of mumbo jumbo. A two loss team with the toughest schedule in the country still isn't getting in over a one loss team. That is especially true for UW. Maybe a blueblood could get in over TCU or Baylor in that scenario. I doubt it, but maybe.
    This is why I firmly believe you need to get the 4 teams up to 8. Allow for the conference champions and then a handful of at larges.
    Who didn't get in that should have these last 2 Seasons?

    Axeing for a fren.
    The third place team in the pac 12 norte this year
    Unfortunately they haven't added the internet poll option.






    Yet.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    HuskyJW said:

    I could really care less about OOC games

    Win the Pac 12 and your OOC games and you're in the playoff. Stanford beats Northwestern they would have been in I think.

    The only benefit to playing difficult OOC games is for the season ticket holders so we don't think we are being completely raped.

    Don James said that it was important to play at least one tough OOC opponent to prepare his team for the conference season.
    Don James believed in an ABC schedule. This is a CFF schedule
    Your favorite AD Pool Boy and HC Sark are the ones that fought for these changes.

    This is what happens when fucktards like you support losers.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CFetters_Nacho_LoverCFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 31,056 Founders Club
    EsophagealFeces said:

    BallSacked said:

    On the flip side - it's really FS to play two OOC road games against teams like BYU and A&M.

    Play one TUFF OOC, and then dreck. That's the formula.

    You must be knew. Everyone knows that the formula is push up the middle and heat from the edge.
    @Passion??!!?? True??!!?!!11!!??
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.