Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

2016 Depth Chart

2»

Comments

  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320

    Most important stat:

    Sark recruits starting - 8
    Non-Sark recruits starting - 14

    Sark recruit backups - 5
    Non-Sark recruit backups - 17

    The odor of Patron surrounding this team is slowly dispersing

    I remember these kind of posts when Sark was our coach. We couldn't wait to get rid of the Ty guys.
    Pete just needs more time to get his own guys in here.
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    Most important stat:

    Sark recruits starting - 8
    Non-Sark recruits starting - 14

    Sark recruit backups - 5
    Non-Sark recruit backups - 17

    The odor of Patron surrounding this team is slowly dispersing

    I remember these kind of posts when Sark was our coach. We couldn't wait to get rid of the Ty guys.
    Same excuses, new year!
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,990

    Most important stat:

    Sark recruits starting - 8
    Non-Sark recruits starting - 14

    Sark recruit backups - 5
    Non-Sark recruit backups - 17

    The odor of Patron surrounding this team is slowly dispersing

    I remember these kind of posts when Sark was our coach. We couldn't wait to get rid of the Ty guys.
    And you'll see them again once Smiff is fired
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744

    I think you are going to see a few of those current no-name white receivers on our bench get touches next year. I think the passing game steps up through players developing chemistry with Browning and not because you have one or two guys all of a sudden develop into playmakers. A lot of those white dudes on the bench are big and could be potential match up nightmares.

    If our WRs figure out how to run good routes and get open Browning will get the ball to them. See this Fred Smoot interview regarding who is the hardest guy to guard in the NFL:

    Q: Which receiver you covered had the crispest routes?

    Smoot: any 6 foot shifty white guy. really any shifty guy in general. it’s not the big tall guys you have to worry about, its the regular sized guy who comes up missing on you.

    http://deadspin.com/fred-smoot-the-sex-boat-wasnt-even-that-cool-1751711676

    What white dudes on the bench? Nik Little?
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,289 Founders Club

    Most important stat:

    Sark recruits starting - 8
    Non-Sark recruits starting - 14

    Sark recruit backups - 5
    Non-Sark recruit backups - 17

    The odor of Patron surrounding this team is slowly dispersing

    I remember these kind of posts when Sark was our coach. We couldn't wait to get rid of the Ty guys.
    Same excuses, new year and another off season NATTY!
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter

    Most important stat:

    Sark recruits starting - 8
    Non-Sark recruits starting - 14

    Sark recruit backups - 5
    Non-Sark recruit backups - 17

    The odor of Patron surrounding this team is slowly dispersing

    I remember these kind of posts when Sark was our coach. We couldn't wait to get rid of the Ty guys.
    Same excuses, new year and another off season NATTY!
    And the faggotist username here.
  • NEsnake12
    NEsnake12 Member Posts: 3,795

    I think you are going to see a few of those current no-name white receivers on our bench get touches next year. I think the passing game steps up through players developing chemistry with Browning and not because you have one or two guys all of a sudden develop into playmakers. A lot of those white dudes on the bench are big and could be potential match up nightmares.

    If our WRs figure out how to run good routes and get open Browning will get the ball to them. See this Fred Smoot interview regarding who is the hardest guy to guard in the NFL:

    Q: Which receiver you covered had the crispest routes?

    Smoot: any 6 foot shifty white guy. really any shifty guy in general. it’s not the big tall guys you have to worry about, its the regular sized guy who comes up missing on you.

    http://deadspin.com/fred-smoot-the-sex-boat-wasnt-even-that-cool-1751711676

    What white dudes on the bench? Nik Little?
    Nik Little is going to be a stud in the 4th quarter vs. Idaho with Lindy at QB.
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    whlinder said:

    How often do we play with only 4 DBs on the field? Got to have a huge % of plays with 5+ DBs out there.

    Do we even have a FB on the roster?

    Maybe someone has the numbers to dispute me, but anecdotally, I don't think I saw us in nickel packages more frequently than other Pac-12 defenses.
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646

    whlinder said:

    How often do we play with only 4 DBs on the field? Got to have a huge % of plays with 5+ DBs out there.

    Do we even have a FB on the roster?

    Maybe someone has the numbers to dispute me, but anecdotally, I don't think I saw us in nickel packages more frequently than other Pac-12 defenses.
    Kevin King is our nickel back, we were in nickel A LOT
  • NEsnake12
    NEsnake12 Member Posts: 3,795

    whlinder said:

    How often do we play with only 4 DBs on the field? Got to have a huge % of plays with 5+ DBs out there.

    Do we even have a FB on the roster?

    Maybe someone has the numbers to dispute me, but anecdotally, I don't think I saw us in nickel packages more frequently than other Pac-12 defenses.
    Kevin King is our nickel back, we were in nickel A LOT
    Too add, King is the starter in base and slides to the slot when we play nickel, and Gardenhire then plays outside. So whatever % of snaps Gardenhire played is how frequently we played nickel, which I think was a very high %.