Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The Future is Bright!

PassionPassion Member Posts: 4,622
edited 2015 24 in Hardcore Husky Board
Browning and Gaskin were featured in a "future is bright" Seattle Times story a few days ago.

Of course, they've been saying this about the defense for several weeks.

Now it's Andrew Kirkland's turn to recite this trendy line (link below).

If we aren't competing for a conference championship next year, all of this is bullshit.

gohuskies.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=30200&ATCLID=210598091
«1

Comments

  • TTJTTJ Member Posts: 4,821
    I wouldn't count him out to earn a starting spot next year. If he moves inside.
  • Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    edited 2015 24
    Kirkland fucking sucks, but whatever. Who did he beat out? Matt James? I mean...

    If you watched the games at all, we had 3 decent OL: Eldrenkamp (who played pretty well), Adams (when he knew what to do, he was good for a frosh) and McGary (same as Adams). Everyone else was shit or mediocre.

    Kirkland embarrassed himself on a 'good' team, but this bullshit shows you how low expectations have gone.

    You have to get constantly blown up to be a disappointment. He sucked. He got no push.

    Fuck... Kirkland love is fucking dawgman level dooging.

    I don't mind the over-inflated expectations dooging. That's just being a fan. But the fucking lowering of standards dooging drives me nuts.

    Next year the starting OL will be something like:

    LT - Adams
    LG - Eldrenkamp
    C - Shelton (who also sucks; but should be slightly better at C next year)
    RG - Sosebee/Roberts/Kirkland
    RT - McGary

    If Kirkland plays it means our talented guys are fuckheads.

    That said, I agree he's exceeded expectations.

    However, if we'd had Josh Garnett, Zach Banner and Stephane Nembot on our line this year as we should have, he wouldn't have seen one fucking down.
  • HFNYHFNY Member Posts: 5,237 Standard Supporter
    Kirkland isn't very good but he's ok for depth. I'd rather a Sark / Tuff Guy Cozz recruit be a JAG than a washout or Taylor Hindy.

    C and RG will likely have the most competition next year and maybe he'll compete at RG...he's just not athletic enough to play RT on a consistent basis.
  • HuskyInAZHuskyInAZ Member Posts: 1,732

    Kirkland fucking sucks, but whatever. Who did he beat out? Matt James? I mean...

    If you watched the games at all, we had 3 decent OL: Eldrenkamp (who played pretty well), Adams (when he knew what to do, he was good for a frosh) and McGary (same as Adams). Everyone else was shit or mediocre.

    Kirkland embarrassed himself on a 'good' team, but this bullshit shows you how low expectations have gone.

    You have to get constantly blown up to be a disappointment. He sucked. He got no push.

    Fuck... Kirkland love is fucking dawgman level dooging.

    I don't mind the over-inflated expectations dooging. That's just being a fan. But the fucking lowering of standards dooging drives me nuts.

    Next year the starting OL will be something like:

    LT - Adams
    LG - Eldrenkamp
    C - Shelton (who also sucks; but should be slightly better at C next year)
    RG - Sosebee/Roberts/Kirkland
    RT - McGary

    If Kirkland plays it means our talented guys are fuckheads.

    That said, I agree he's exceeded expectations.

    However, if we'd had Josh Garnett, Zach Banner and Stephane Nembot on our line this year as we should have, he wouldn't have seen one fucking down.

    What a fucking idiotic poast. The is so much stupidity, where to begin?

    No one is throwing "love" Kirkland's way, dumbass. The point is no one thought he'd ever get close to the field, and he did, and he didn't suck. Was he great? Good? Probably serviceable is the best description. But that's still far beyond expectations.

    Anointing McGary as the starter next year is FS. Sure, he could earn it, but he fucked the pooch as much or more than Kirkland.

    If Kirkland plays next year, maybe, just maybe, it's due to injuries. You know, like this year. He may also beat out the competition.

    And to add on to your "If ifs and buts were candy and nuts" drivel, if McCaffrey were in our backfield this year, Gaskin would not have done shit.

    You can do better. I've heard it on the podcast.
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,910 Swaye's Wigwam
  • Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    HuskyInAZ said:

    Kirkland fucking sucks, but whatever. Who did he beat out? Matt James? I mean...

    If you watched the games at all, we had 3 decent OL: Eldrenkamp (who played pretty well), Adams (when he knew what to do, he was good for a frosh) and McGary (same as Adams). Everyone else was shit or mediocre.

    Kirkland embarrassed himself on a 'good' team, but this bullshit shows you how low expectations have gone.

    You have to get constantly blown up to be a disappointment. He sucked. He got no push.

    Fuck... Kirkland love is fucking dawgman level dooging.

    I don't mind the over-inflated expectations dooging. That's just being a fan. But the fucking lowering of standards dooging drives me nuts.

    Next year the starting OL will be something like:

    LT - Adams
    LG - Eldrenkamp
    C - Shelton (who also sucks; but should be slightly better at C next year)
    RG - Sosebee/Roberts/Kirkland
    RT - McGary

    If Kirkland plays it means our talented guys are fuckheads.

    That said, I agree he's exceeded expectations.

    However, if we'd had Josh Garnett, Zach Banner and Stephane Nembot on our line this year as we should have, he wouldn't have seen one fucking down.

    What a fucking idiotic poast. The is so much stupidity, where to begin?

    No one is throwing "love" Kirkland's way, dumbass. The point is no one thought he'd ever get close to the field, and he did, and he didn't suck. Was he great? Good? Probably serviceable is the best description. But that's still far beyond expectations.

    Anointing McGary as the starter next year is FS. Sure, he could earn it, but he fucked the pooch as much or more than Kirkland.

    If Kirkland plays next year, maybe, just maybe, it's due to injuries. You know, like this year. He may also beat out the competition.

    And to add on to your "If ifs and buts were candy and nuts" drivel, if McCaffrey were in our backfield this year, Gaskin would not have done shit.

    You can do better. I've heard it on the podcast.
    Uhhhh...

    Anyway, thanks for listening! ;)
  • HuskyInAZHuskyInAZ Member Posts: 1,732

    HuskyInAZ said:

    Kirkland fucking sucks, but whatever. Who did he beat out? Matt James? I mean...

    If you watched the games at all, we had 3 decent OL: Eldrenkamp (who played pretty well), Adams (when he knew what to do, he was good for a frosh) and McGary (same as Adams). Everyone else was shit or mediocre.

    Kirkland embarrassed himself on a 'good' team, but this bullshit shows you how low expectations have gone.

    You have to get constantly blown up to be a disappointment. He sucked. He got no push.

    Fuck... Kirkland love is fucking dawgman level dooging.

    I don't mind the over-inflated expectations dooging. That's just being a fan. But the fucking lowering of standards dooging drives me nuts.

    Next year the starting OL will be something like:

    LT - Adams
    LG - Eldrenkamp
    C - Shelton (who also sucks; but should be slightly better at C next year)
    RG - Sosebee/Roberts/Kirkland
    RT - McGary

    If Kirkland plays it means our talented guys are fuckheads.

    That said, I agree he's exceeded expectations.

    However, if we'd had Josh Garnett, Zach Banner and Stephane Nembot on our line this year as we should have, he wouldn't have seen one fucking down.

    What a fucking idiotic poast. The is so much stupidity, where to begin?

    No one is throwing "love" Kirkland's way, dumbass. The point is no one thought he'd ever get close to the field, and he did, and he didn't suck. Was he great? Good? Probably serviceable is the best description. But that's still far beyond expectations.

    Anointing McGary as the starter next year is FS. Sure, he could earn it, but he fucked the pooch as much or more than Kirkland.

    If Kirkland plays next year, maybe, just maybe, it's due to injuries. You know, like this year. He may also beat out the competition.

    And to add on to your "If ifs and buts were candy and nuts" drivel, if McCaffrey were in our backfield this year, Gaskin would not have done shit.

    You can do better. I've heard it on the podcast.
    Uhhhh...

    Anyway, thanks for listening! ;)
    Seriously, you do a great job on the podcast. But this poast was really FS.
  • Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    HuskyInAZ said:

    HuskyInAZ said:

    Kirkland fucking sucks, but whatever. Who did he beat out? Matt James? I mean...

    If you watched the games at all, we had 3 decent OL: Eldrenkamp (who played pretty well), Adams (when he knew what to do, he was good for a frosh) and McGary (same as Adams). Everyone else was shit or mediocre.

    Kirkland embarrassed himself on a 'good' team, but this bullshit shows you how low expectations have gone.

    You have to get constantly blown up to be a disappointment. He sucked. He got no push.

    Fuck... Kirkland love is fucking dawgman level dooging.

    I don't mind the over-inflated expectations dooging. That's just being a fan. But the fucking lowering of standards dooging drives me nuts.

    Next year the starting OL will be something like:

    LT - Adams
    LG - Eldrenkamp
    C - Shelton (who also sucks; but should be slightly better at C next year)
    RG - Sosebee/Roberts/Kirkland
    RT - McGary

    If Kirkland plays it means our talented guys are fuckheads.

    That said, I agree he's exceeded expectations.

    However, if we'd had Josh Garnett, Zach Banner and Stephane Nembot on our line this year as we should have, he wouldn't have seen one fucking down.

    What a fucking idiotic poast. The is so much stupidity, where to begin?

    No one is throwing "love" Kirkland's way, dumbass. The point is no one thought he'd ever get close to the field, and he did, and he didn't suck. Was he great? Good? Probably serviceable is the best description. But that's still far beyond expectations.

    Anointing McGary as the starter next year is FS. Sure, he could earn it, but he fucked the pooch as much or more than Kirkland.

    If Kirkland plays next year, maybe, just maybe, it's due to injuries. You know, like this year. He may also beat out the competition.

    And to add on to your "If ifs and buts were candy and nuts" drivel, if McCaffrey were in our backfield this year, Gaskin would not have done shit.

    You can do better. I've heard it on the podcast.
    Uhhhh...

    Anyway, thanks for listening! ;)
    Seriously, you do a great job on the podcast. But this poast was really FS.
    Aww, thank you. I love you.
  • HuskyInAZHuskyInAZ Member Posts: 1,732

    HuskyInAZ said:

    HuskyInAZ said:

    Kirkland fucking sucks, but whatever. Who did he beat out? Matt James? I mean...

    If you watched the games at all, we had 3 decent OL: Eldrenkamp (who played pretty well), Adams (when he knew what to do, he was good for a frosh) and McGary (same as Adams). Everyone else was shit or mediocre.

    Kirkland embarrassed himself on a 'good' team, but this bullshit shows you how low expectations have gone.

    You have to get constantly blown up to be a disappointment. He sucked. He got no push.

    Fuck... Kirkland love is fucking dawgman level dooging.

    I don't mind the over-inflated expectations dooging. That's just being a fan. But the fucking lowering of standards dooging drives me nuts.

    Next year the starting OL will be something like:

    LT - Adams
    LG - Eldrenkamp
    C - Shelton (who also sucks; but should be slightly better at C next year)
    RG - Sosebee/Roberts/Kirkland
    RT - McGary

    If Kirkland plays it means our talented guys are fuckheads.

    That said, I agree he's exceeded expectations.

    However, if we'd had Josh Garnett, Zach Banner and Stephane Nembot on our line this year as we should have, he wouldn't have seen one fucking down.

    What a fucking idiotic poast. The is so much stupidity, where to begin?

    No one is throwing "love" Kirkland's way, dumbass. The point is no one thought he'd ever get close to the field, and he did, and he didn't suck. Was he great? Good? Probably serviceable is the best description. But that's still far beyond expectations.

    Anointing McGary as the starter next year is FS. Sure, he could earn it, but he fucked the pooch as much or more than Kirkland.

    If Kirkland plays next year, maybe, just maybe, it's due to injuries. You know, like this year. He may also beat out the competition.

    And to add on to your "If ifs and buts were candy and nuts" drivel, if McCaffrey were in our backfield this year, Gaskin would not have done shit.

    You can do better. I've heard it on the podcast.
    Uhhhh...

    Anyway, thanks for listening! ;)
    Seriously, you do a great job on the podcast. But this poast was really FS.
    Aww, thank you. I love you.
    Maybe great was too gratuitous. How about we go with serviceable.
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    So will next year's 6-6>>>>>>>>>>>>>this year's 6-6?
  • bananasnblondesbananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,430
    McGary was very hit and miss last year (which you'd expect from someone playing their first year at a position). He shows more upside than Kirkland (who didn't make as many mistakes but didn't excel) which is why Kirkland started getting more and more time at RT. McGary should have the position locked down eventually but Kirkland is a good insurance policy. We haven't had 5 solid backups on the OL in like 20 years but we'll be close next year.
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,892
    edited 2015 24

    That said, I agree he's exceeded expectations.

    However, if we'd had Josh Garnett, Zach Banner and Stephane Nembot on our line this year as we should have, he wouldn't have seen one fucking down.


    Losing out on recruits to Colorado is always special.

    It is cute how you believe Nembot is anything more than a big sack of shit though.

    Just fucking darling.
Sign In or Register to comment.