Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Oregon Ducks 2016 Football Schedule At A Glance
Comments
-
Oregon doesn't go 4-8, that's not what winners do.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
And what was the only thing that stopped Oregon from going 4-8?Mosster47 said:
Oregon's D was awful in 2014. Oregon's D was awful in 2015. Oregon's D will be awful in 2016.ntxduck said:
LOL.doogsinparadise said:UC Davis? Such fag, Oregon.
@Nebraska, UVA, UC Davis>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Idaho, Rutgers, Portland State
That being said, Moss is forgetting that Oregon's D will still be awful next year. Unless the Ducks score 40+ every game, they will drop a few.
What was the only that stopped Oregon in those three seasons? Not having a healthy QB for a few weeks.
The Duck will drop one somewhere next year. Again, if it's not Stanford they are playoff bound.
Prukop better be pretty good or Oregon is in trouble. -
LOL
Winners win the games that matter.
Runner-ups and Alamo Bowls don't make Oregon a winner.
-
Oregon is going all the way and winning a natty!!!!!!!11!!!!!!!!11@!!!!!
-
Considering the loaded Pac 12 N, that's a top 25 schedule and that's all ya need to get to a playoff.
Of course they will lose 3 or 4 games and by November that dream will be distant mammory,
But still. -
In the last ten years Oregon and Alabama are tied for the most wins.MakaDawg said:LOL
Winners win the games that matter.
Runner-ups and Alamo Bowls don't make Oregon a winner.
Do you have a better definition of winning fuck-O? Is it your half trophy and made up banner from the olden days? -
LOLMosster47 said:
In the last ten years Oregon and Alabama are tied for the most wins.MakaDawg said:LOL
Winners win the games that matter.
Runner-ups and Alamo Bowls don't make Oregon a winner.
Do you have a better definition of winning fuck-O? Is it your half trophy and made up banner from the olden days?
Like I said, winners win the games that matter. Alabama has done that. Ohio State has done that. Oregon? Not so much.
And, I'm sorry- Did I bring Washington into the discussion? No. They're not winners either, and I was a grunting, shitting, combative "fuck-O" (!!!!!!) of an infant when the Huskies won their Natty (or half a natty- whatever makes you feel better). I don't cling to that raft. You clearly do though.
But you go ahead and hang your hat on the fact that Oregon has won the same amount of games as Alabama in a decade. I guess Oregon is a winner like Alabama by that logic. Or are we breaking it down into tiers? Participation trophies? -
How is the trophy count competition going?Mosster47 said:
In the last ten years Oregon and Alabama are tied for the most wins.MakaDawg said:LOL
Winners win the games that matter.
Runner-ups and Alamo Bowls don't make Oregon a winner.
Do you have a better definition of winning fuck-O? Is it your half trophy and made up banner from the olden days? -
Bearcat47FS would piss all over himself for half a natty.sarktastic said:
How is the trophy count competition going?Mosster47 said:
In the last ten years Oregon and Alabama are tied for the most wins.MakaDawg said:LOL
Winners win the games that matter.
Runner-ups and Alamo Bowls don't make Oregon a winner.
Do you have a better definition of winning fuck-O? Is it your half trophy and made up banner from the olden days?
-
-
Do Rose Bowls no longer count now that Oregon wins them for fun?MakaDawg said:LOL
Winners win the games that matter.
Runner-ups and Alamo Bowls don't make Oregon a winner.
I Remember when they used to Really, really, really count around here.
Larry Coker, 1, UW 1/2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wd8Rqy3xXos