USC players say Sark betrayed them with lawsuit

DerekJohnson

presstelegraph.com/2015/12/09/usc-players-say-steve-sarkisian-betrayed-them-with-lawsuit.html

Hippopeteamus

DerekJohnson said:

presstelegraph.com/2015/12/09/usc-players-say-steve-sarkisian-betrayed-them-with-lawsuit.html

USC should settle, but pay him with three-dollar bills.

PurpleJ

Hippopeteamus said:

DerekJohnson said:

presstelegraph.com/2015/12/09/usc-players-say-steve-sarkisian-betrayed-them-with-lawsuit.html

USC should settle, but pay him with a lifetime supply of booze and pills.

doogville

That was not technically gifted writing.

section8

Someone got paid to write that?

d2d

I predicted it. It's very difficult to fire an alcoholic on the first instance. (Just saying what the law is, NOT that I agree with it. I actually went though this in CA in the 80's with an employee.) It's just as hard as firing a minority (Coach); and we all remember what that was like. If they agree to go to rehab, you have to let them come back. We actually had to give him a urinalysis once a day for several months until he flunked one. THEN we could fire his worthless ass. It didn't even matter that he almost never did his job.

Everybody now has extra rights including alcoholics. Except it's perfectly legal to discriminate against White, Heterosexual, Christian, Males of any age.

Thanks Liberals. What HAVEN'T you screwed up in the past 35 years ???

"Much of the social history of the Western world over the past three decades has involved replacing what worked with what sounded good."
Thomas Sowell

skookum

he better get an assload of dough, he's never working again

2001400ex

d2d said:

I predicted it. It's very difficult to fire an alcoholic on the first instance. (Just saying what the law is, NOT that I agree with it. I actually went though this in CA in the 80's with an employee.) It's just as hard as firing a minority (Coach); and we all remember what that was like. If they agree to go to rehab, you have to let them come back. We actually had to give him a urinalysis once a day for several months until he flunked one. THEN we could fire his worthless ass. It didn't even matter that he almost never did his job.

Everybody now has extra rights including alcoholics. Except it's perfectly legal to discriminate against White, Heterosexual, Christian, Males of any age.

Thanks Liberals. What HAVEN'T you screwed up in the past 35 years ???

"Much of the social history of the Western world over the past three decades has involved replacing what worked with what sounded good."
Thomas Sowell

I thought the 80s were the conservative golden age. Now you are blaming liberals.

Don't you have someone to sue for libel and slander?

creepycoug

d2d said:

I predicted it. It's very difficult to fire an alcoholic on the first instance. (Just saying what the law is, NOT that I agree with it. I actually went though this in CA in the 80's with an employee.) It's just as hard as firing a minority (Coach); and we all remember what that was like. If they agree to go to rehab, you have to let them come back. We actually had to give him a urinalysis once a day for several months until he flunked one. THEN we could fire his worthless ass. It didn't even matter that he almost never did his job.

Everybody now has extra rights including alcoholics. Except it's perfectly legal to discriminate against White, Heterosexual, Christian, Males of any age.

Thanks Liberals. What HAVEN'T you screwed up in the past 35 years ???

"Much of the social history of the Western world over the past three decades has involved replacing what worked with what sounded good."
Thomas Sowell

Shut up. You had an employee like a monkey just flew out of my ass. You couldn't even get into Whitman.

H_D

skookum said:

he better get an assload of dough, he's never working again

Welcome to retirement!

FremontTroll

d2d said:

I predicted it. It's very difficult to fire an alcoholic on the first instance. (Just saying what the law is, NOT that I agree with it. I actually went though this in CA in the 80's with an employee.) It's just as hard as firing a minority (Coach); and we all remember what that was like. If they agree to go to rehab, you have to let them come back. We actually had to give him a urinalysis once a day for several months until he flunked one. THEN we could fire his worthless ass. It didn't even matter that he almost never did his job.

Everybody now has extra rights including alcoholics. Except it's perfectly legal to discriminate against White, Heterosexual, Christian, Males of any age.

Thanks Liberals. What HAVEN'T you screwed up in the past 35 years ???

"Much of the social history of the Western world over the past three decades has involved replacing what worked with what sounded good."
Thomas Sowell

Cool rant bro but just because you sue someone doesn't mean you're getting paid.

WilburHooksHands

d2d said:

I predicted it. It's very difficult to fire an alcoholic on the first instance. (Just saying what the law is, NOT that I agree with it. I actually went though this in CA in the 80's with an employee.) It's just as hard as firing a minority (Coach); and we all remember what that was like. If they agree to go to rehab, you have to let them come back. We actually had to give him a urinalysis once a day for several months until he flunked one. THEN we could fire his worthless ass. It didn't even matter that he almost never did his job.

Everybody now has extra rights including alcoholics. Except it's perfectly legal to discriminate against White, Heterosexual, Christian, Males of any age.

Thanks Liberals. What HAVEN'T you screwed up in the past 35 years ???

"Much of the social history of the Western world over the past three decades has involved replacing what worked with what sounded good."
Thomas Sowell

Sounds like you care.

Dennis_DeYoung

Players are fucking stupid. So are coaches. Fuck everyone.

QuornDawg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGJyu5vQRvs

PurpleThrobber

Dennis_DeYoung said:

Players are fucking stupid. So are coaches. Fuck everyone.

Such plagiarism of Mike Leech, fucko.

HuskyJW

I was against Sark until about two days ago...

Now these assholes with their Los Angeles values are just piling on.. I hate Sark but I hate USC even worse and I hope he takes them to the cleaners. He won't......he'll settle for about 5 million or so but I sure would like to have him win the whole thing

GrundleStiltzkin

HuskyJW said:

I was against Sark until about two days ago...

Now these assholes with their Los Angeles values are just piling on.. I hate Sark but I hate USC even worse and I hope he takes them to the cleaners. He won't......he'll settle for about 5 million or so but I sure would like to have him win the whole thing

HuskyJW

WilburHooksHands said:

d2d said:

I predicted it. It's very difficult to fire an alcoholic on the first instance. (Just saying what the law is, NOT that I agree with it. I actually went though this in CA in the 80's with an employee.) It's just as hard as firing a minority (Coach); and we all remember what that was like. If they agree to go to rehab, you have to let them come back. We actually had to give him a urinalysis once a day for several months until he flunked one. THEN we could fire his worthless ass. It didn't even matter that he almost never did his job.

Everybody now has extra rights including alcoholics. Except it's perfectly legal to discriminate against White, Heterosexual, Christian, Males of any age.

Thanks Liberals. What HAVEN'T you screwed up in the past 35 years ???

"Much of the social history of the Western world over the past three decades has involved replacing what worked with what sounded good."
Thomas Sowell

Sounds like you care.

I know you're being sarcastic but do you think most alcoholics are liberals? I sure don't.

CuntWaffle

I didn't realize Sark was going after the USC player's money.

MisterEm

CuntWaffle said:

I didn't realize Sark was going after the USC player's money.

Huh?

PurpleBaze

H_D said:

skookum said:

he better get an assload of dough, he's never working again

Welcome to retirement!

Hard to distinguish between Ty's retirement activities vs. those he was involved in while employed.